Feat (docs): Add SambaNova provider #5281
Open
+174
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lgrammel
reviewed
Mar 20, 2025
Comment on lines
16
to
29
| ```bash | ||
| # With npm | ||
| npm install sambanova-ai-provider | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| # With yarn | ||
| yarn add sambanova-ai-provider | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| # With pnpm | ||
| pnpm add sambanova-ai-provider | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use switcher (see other community providers eg ollama)
lgrammel
reviewed
Mar 20, 2025
|
|
||
| ### Example | ||
|
|
||
| ```js |
lgrammel
reviewed
Mar 20, 2025
|
|
||
| const model = sambanovaProvider('Meta-Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct'); | ||
|
|
||
| await generateText({ |
lgrammel
reviewed
Mar 20, 2025
|
|
||
| Basic demonstration of text generation using the SambaNova provider. | ||
|
|
||
| ```js |
lgrammel
reviewed
Mar 20, 2025
|
|
||
| | Chat completion | Image input | | ||
| | ------------------ | ------------------ | | ||
| | :white_check_mark: | :white_check_mark: | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
unclear if supported, please use <Check size={18} />
lgrammel
reviewed
Mar 20, 2025
| @@ -0,0 +1,178 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
| title: SambaNova | |||
| description: Learn how to use SambaNova provider for the AI SDK. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
...to use the SambaNova provider...
|
@lgrammel fixed comments. Also I want to remark my question: as this is going to be the official SambaNova provider, is it correct to have it under community providers and not under the official ones? What's the difference? Can we aim to be official? |
- The repo is internal for now
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As it was suggested at #5122, I want to add SambaNova as a custom third party provider.
We're currently missing the NPM package and official repository link as we're currently working to publish it, but if we can get reviewed to know that everything's working fine would be great.
I was wondering if this is the correct approach, and not the approach of an individual that wants to create an unofficial provider, because I noticed that there are two types of providers: "official" ones being handled at
content/providers/01-ai-sdk-providersand community ones being handled atcontent/providers/03-community-providers.And we want our company to have an official integration/provider with this repo, so that's why I'm asking this.
Thanks.
cc. @lgrammel