Skip to content

feat: Telegram guardian verification flow (setup + inbound command)#6655

Merged
noanflaherty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
swarm/tg-guardian-verify/task-2
Feb 22, 2026
Merged

feat: Telegram guardian verification flow (setup + inbound command)#6655
noanflaherty merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
swarm/tg-guardian-verify/task-2

Conversation

@noanflaherty
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@noanflaherty noanflaherty commented Feb 22, 2026

Implement end-to-end guardian verification for Telegram channels.\n\n## Changes\n- Add /guardian-verify command intercept in channel-routes.ts\n- Add guardian_verification IPC handler in daemon config\n- Update Telegram setup SKILL.md with guardian verification step\n\nPart of #6644


Open with Devin

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@noanflaherty noanflaherty self-assigned this Feb 22, 2026
@noanflaherty noanflaherty merged commit 2e24c72 into main Feb 22, 2026
@noanflaherty noanflaherty deleted the swarm/tg-guardian-verify/task-2 branch February 22, 2026 18:57
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Devin Review found 1 potential issue.

View 5 additional findings in Devin Review.

Open in Devin Review

Comment thread assistant/src/runtime/routes/channel-routes.ts
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f933952568

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread assistant/src/daemon/ipc-contract.ts
Comment thread assistant/src/runtime/routes/channel-routes.ts
@noanflaherty
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Addressed in #6664

ashleeradka added a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
…s) (#30642)

The enrichment script added in #30639 was meant to inject magic-word Linear
identifiers into cherry-pick PR bodies so the Linear Release CLI could extract
them from the squash commit. Empirical testing against Linear's GraphQL API
proved this is unnecessary: when the CLI passes `pullRequestReferences` to
`releaseSyncByAccessKey`, Linear's server resolves each PR to its Development-
panel-linked issues and stamps the release with them, regardless of whether
any Linear identifier appears in commit text.

The cherry-pick squash commit already contains `(#NNN)` references to each
original main PR, which the CLI extracts as `pullRequestReferences`. Linear's
server then finds each main PR's linked issues via the Development panel and
attaches them to the release automatically.

Test case: PR vellum-ai/vellum-assistant-platform#6655 has Dev-panel attachment
ATL-545 and zero LUM/ATL/JARVIS-N mentions in its title, branch, body, or
commit message. Calling `releaseSyncByAccessKey` with only
`pullRequestReferences: [#6655]` (no `issueReferences`) produced a release
stamped with ATL-545. Repeating the test with PR #6708 (LUM-1536 linked)
produced a release stamped with LUM-1536. The resolution is purely server-
side via attachment records.

Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant