Use Named Fields and Align Structures to Reduce Memory Usage #1814
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@erikdubbelboer Not sure your thoughts on this since it changes the order of fields in some of the public structs.
Affected Public Structs:
This is something we ran into in Fiber gofiber/fiber#3079, we had a lot of places in the code base using
positional
instead ofnamed
fields. This can cause major bugs in the future when the underlying struct changes. I wrote an analyzer to detect and fix these issues. After fixing those, I ranbetteralign
against the whole code base.Summary of savings:
Total savings: 1336 bytes