-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conditional Validation for parameter algorithm in isHash function #2296
Open
KUSHAGRARAJTIWARI
wants to merge
8
commits into
validatorjs:master
Choose a base branch
from
KUSHAGRARAJTIWARI:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
78f4359
Added utility function to check presence of given key in given object.
c49c8f6
Test cases for utility method: validateKey
c2186bd
Conditional validation for parameter algorithm in isHash function
ffdf76d
Test case changes for optional validation of algorithm in isHash func…
c49fbc1
Documented changes for conditional validation of parameter algorithm …
c28b702
Changed error object to regex in validateKey test case.
8efdfe5
Better way to check key in an object.
2ade081
Added new test for function validateKey
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
export default function validateKey(object, key, errorMessage) { | ||
if (object[key] === undefined) { | ||
throw new Error(errorMessage); | ||
} | ||
return true; | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Daniyal-Qureshi
Thanks for your suggestion. But, if(object[key]) will result false if object[key] is any falsy value like 0, "" (empty string), null, etc. This will defeat the purpose of the function validateKey.
I used a better way of checking the key of any object. Please provide your suggestions on that code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@KUSHAGRARAJTIWARI Previously, you were checking the value of the given key,I suggested the better way to check if the value is undefined, I think you need to check whether is key is present in the object or not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, you are correct. I changed the code and am now using the hasOwnProperty() method. This method sends true if the key is present in the object irrespective of the corresponding value. Using Javascript utility functions is good for code.
After your comment, I recollected that there is a function hasOwnProperty() to check if any key is present in the object or not. Thanks for your comment.