Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unit test to verify that conflicting output styles result in an error #51

Merged

Conversation

oSoMoN
Copy link
Collaborator

@oSoMoN oSoMoN commented Apr 5, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 5, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.98%. Comparing base (c08e0b6) to head (c325291).

Files Patch % Lines
src/params.rs 80.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #51      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.82%   76.98%   +0.16%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines        2567     2572       +5     
  Branches      657      659       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         1972     1980       +8     
+ Misses        466      462       -4     
- Partials      129      130       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
macos_latest 77.16% <80.00%> (+0.16%) ⬆️
ubuntu_latest 77.02% <80.00%> (+0.16%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sylvestre sylvestre merged commit 9507ca2 into uutils:main Apr 6, 2024
23 of 25 checks passed
@oSoMoN oSoMoN deleted the unit-tests-for-conflicting-output-style branch April 6, 2024 20:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants