Skip to content

Use the new function 'fails_with_code' - followup #7391

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025
Merged

Use the new function 'fails_with_code' - followup #7391

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor

@sylvestre sylvestre commented Mar 4, 2025

No description provided.

@cakebaker
Copy link
Contributor

cakebaker commented Mar 4, 2025

Two tests are failing now: test_tail::test_bytes_for_funny_unix_files and test_whoami::test_normal. My guess is that those tests should use succeeds instead of fails_with_code.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 4, 2025

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/misc/stdbuf (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

@sylvestre sylvestre requested review from RenjiSann and cakebaker March 4, 2025 08:58
@cakebaker cakebaker merged commit c8fa107 into uutils:main Mar 4, 2025
65 checks passed
@sylvestre sylvestre deleted the use-new-function branch March 4, 2025 09:55
@moonfruit moonfruit mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@cakebaker cakebaker Awaiting requested review from cakebaker

@RenjiSann RenjiSann Awaiting requested review from RenjiSann

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@sylvestre @cakebaker