Add support for wildcard and exception

[Suven-p]

Fix #22
Fix appwrite/appwrite#5317

Appwrite relies on public suffix list to parse domain names. According to the format specification:

1. The wildcard character * matches any valid sequence of characters in a hostname part.
2. An exclamation mark (!) at the start of a rule marks an exception to a previous wildcard rule. An exception rule takes priority over any other matching rule.

Current behaviour:
The current implementation does not handle both cases. It handles suffixes without * and ! which covers all common use cases but excludes some country tld's such as *.np.

Expected behaviour:

• With rule: *.np suffix for example.com.np is com.np
• With rules: *.kawasaki.jp and !city.kawasaki.jp suffix for app.example.kawasaki.jp is example.kawasaki.jp and suffix for app.city.kawasaki.jp is kawasaki.jp

[Suven-p]

The tests for OpenSRS fails but I haven't modified anything related to OpenSRS.

[Suven-p]

@TorstenDittmann Could you please review this?

[Suven-p]

@wess Could you review this 😅? I can't currently use my domain since it's not supported appwrite/appwrite#5317

[wess]

The tests for OpenSRS fails but I haven't modified anything related to OpenSRS.

Did you pull in the latest master? There was an issue with that test but it should be addressed.

[wess]

Could you please add a test (or 2) for testing the rules?

[Suven-p]

Did you pull in the latest master? There was an issue with that test but it should be addressed.

I think so. The hash of third last commit from my branch matches with master.

[wess]

Did you pull in the latest master? There was an issue with that test but it should be addressed.

I think so. The hash of third last commit from my branch matches with master.

Thank you for checking, if you could add those tests then i can also run the tests to see if there is any branch drift. Thanks again for the contribution, this is a killer feature.

[Suven-p]

The last commit adds the tests.

[Suven-p]

@wess Any updates?

[stnguyen90]

@wess, should the travis build pass?

[wess]

Looks good, and no issues on my end. @TorstenDittmann should this type of update be required to pass Travis?

[wess]

Looks good, and no issues on my end. @TorstenDittmann should this type of update be required to pass Travis?

[stnguyen90]

Would you be able to add some additional test cases?

• *.nom.br
• *.kawasaki.jp
• !city.kawasaki.jp
• *.dev.adobeaemcloud.com
• adobeaemcloud.net

[stnguyen90]

Hey 👋 awesome work on your PR! We've approved your work and it'll be merged soon!