Fix gptoss 4bit#524
Conversation
…iler-export' into fix_gptoss_4bit
Summary of ChangesHello @Datta0, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request primarily addresses and resolves issues encountered with GPT OSS 4-bit models on T4 GPUs by reverting previously introduced code that aimed to convert Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
12a575a to
d4518b5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request reverts code related to 4-bit support for Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models, which was causing issues. The changes primarily involve deleting the problematic patches from unsloth_zoo/temporary_patches/misc.py and related dequantization logic from unsloth_zoo/temporary_patches/moe_utils.py. Additionally, there are minor improvements in unsloth_zoo/compiler.py, including a new log message and a more specific condition for detecting patched forward functions. The changes are consistent with the goal of fixing the described issue, and I have not found any problems with this pull request.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 12a575ae4e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| if orig_fwd: | ||
| patched_forward_info = (func_match.group(1), orig_fwd.group(1)) | ||
| disable = None # Keep patched source as-is for renamed forward replacements | ||
| if "@torch.compiler.disable" in forward_source: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Detect renamed forward patches without disable decorator
Limiting renamed-forward detection to sources containing @torch.compiler.disable skips valid patched forwards that are renamed but undecorated (for example patch_function(DeepseekV3MoE, "forward", patched_moe_forward) in temporary_patches/deepseek_v3_moe.py). When this branch is skipped, create_standalone_class no longer swaps the class’s original forward with the patched implementation, so compiled modules silently fall back to stale/original forward logic and lose the runtime patch behavior.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
I accidentally added some code to convert nn.Parameter to 4bit support. That seems to have caused issues with GPT OSS 4bit on T4. Undo that code :)
Source of the issue: #495
Note: I merged #519 to resolve the path issue for testing