-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 610
docs: README for @unkey/nextjs #2162 #2166
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ | ||
| <div align="center"> | ||
| <h1 align="center">@unkey/nextjs</h1> | ||
| <h5>`@unkey/nextjs` the official SDK for Next.js. Just use it in your route handlers a direct and type-safe method to verify API keys.</h5> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <div align="center"> | ||
| <a href="https://www.unkey.com/docs/libraries/ts/nextjs">Documentation</a> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <br/> | ||
|
|
||
| ## Installation | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| npm install @unkey/nextjs | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ## Quickstart | ||
|
|
||
| Protecting API routes is as simple as wrapping them with the ```withUnkey``` handler: | ||
|
|
||
| ```ts | ||
| import { NextRequestWithUnkeyContext, withUnkey } from '@unkey/nextjs'; | ||
|
|
||
| export const POST = withUnkey(async (req) => { | ||
|
|
||
| // Process the request here | ||
| // You have access to the verification response using `req.unkey` | ||
| console.log(req.unkey); | ||
|
|
||
| return new Response('Your API key is valid!'); | ||
| }); | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| That’s it! Since this is just handling key verification, there’s no need to specify a root key as an environment variable. | ||
|
|
||
| If you want to customize how withUnkey processes incoming requests, you can do so as follows: | ||
|
|
||
| ## ```getKey``` | ||
| By default, withUnkey will look for a bearer token located in the ```authorization``` header. If you want to customize this, you can do so by passing a getter in the configuration object: | ||
|
|
||
| ```ts | ||
| export const GET = withUnkey(async (req) => { | ||
| // ... | ||
| }, { | ||
| getKey: (req) => new URL(req.url).searchParams.get("key"), | ||
| }); | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ## ```onError``` | ||
|
|
||
| You can specify custom error handling. By default errors will be logged to the console, and ```withUnkey``` will return a NextResponse with status 500. | ||
|
|
||
| ```ts | ||
| export const GET = withUnkey(async (req) => { | ||
| // ... | ||
| }, { | ||
| onError: async (req, res) => { | ||
| await analytics.trackEvent(`Error ${res.code}: ${res.message}`) | ||
| return new NextResponse("Unkey error", { status: 500 }) | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ## ```handleInvalidKey``` | ||
|
|
||
| Specify what to do if Unkey reports that your key is invalid. | ||
|
|
||
| ```ts | ||
| export const GET = withUnkey(async (req) => { | ||
| // ... | ||
| }, { | ||
| handleInvalidKey: (req, res) => { | ||
| return new Response("Unauthorized", { status: 401 }) | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## Disable telemetry | ||
|
|
||
| By default, Unkey collects anonymous telemetry data to help us understand how our SDKs are used. | ||
|
|
||
| If you wish to disable this, you can do so by passing a boolean flag to the constructor: | ||
|
|
||
| ```ts | ||
| export const GET = withUnkey(async (req) => { | ||
| // ... | ||
| }, { disableTelemetry: true }); | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ### Documentation | ||
|
|
||
| [Read the full documentation](https://www.unkey.com/docs/libraries/ts/nextjs) | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Issues Found: Inconsistent Indentation in
README.mdThe
README.mdfile exhibits inconsistent indentation, using both tabs and spaces within the code examples and documentation. Specifically:Uses Tabs:
getKey: (req) => new URL(req.url).searchParams.get("key"),onError: async (req, res) => {handleInvalidKey: (req, res) => {Uses Spaces:
Recommendation:
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Customization options are well-explained with clear examples.
The customization section covers important options like
getKey,onError, andhandleInvalidKey, providing users with the flexibility to adapt the SDK to their needs.onErrorexample, consider adding a comment explaining whatres.codeandres.messagerepresent.To check for consistent indentation across the file, run:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 874
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
🪛 Markdownlint