-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(deps): update dependency containers/podman to v5.2.4 #7556
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Auto-approved because label type/renovate is present.
🔍 Vulnerabilities of
|
digest | sha256:faa474a6110c495929ce5050e5c3fa12bbc78db2148bafd807a3c7fac39644c7 |
vulnerabilities | |
platform | linux/amd64 |
size | 34 MB |
packages | 172 |
github.com/opencontainers/runc
|
Affected range | <1.2.0-rc.1 |
Fixed version | 1.2.0-rc.1 |
CVSS Score | 7.2 |
CVSS Vector | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
Description
Withdrawn Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it was incorrectly attributed to runc. Please see the issue here for more information.
Original Description
A flaw was found in cri-o, where an arbitrary systemd property can be injected via a Pod annotation. Any user who can create a pod with an arbitrary annotation may perform an arbitrary action on the host system. This issue has its root in how runc handles Config Annotations lists.
OWASP Top Ten 2017 Category A9 - Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities
Affected range | <=v1.1.4 |
Fixed version | Not Fixed |
CVSS Score | 7 |
CVSS Vector | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
Description
runc through 1.1.4 has Incorrect Access Control leading to Escalation of Privileges, related to libcontainer/rootfs_linux.go. To exploit this, an attacker must be able to spawn two containers with custom volume-mount configurations, and be able to run custom images. NOTE: this issue exists because of a CVE-2019-19921 regression.
Improper Preservation of Permissions
Affected range | <1.1.5 |
Fixed version | 1.1.5 |
CVSS Score | 6.1 |
CVSS Vector | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L |
Description
Impact
It was found that AppArmor, and potentially SELinux, can be bypassed when
/proc
inside the container is symlinked with a specific mount configuration.Patches
Fixed in runc v1.1.5, by prohibiting symlinked
/proc
: opencontainers/runc#3785This PR fixes CVE-2023-27561 as well.
Workarounds
Avoid using an untrusted container image.
Affected range | <1.1.2 |
Fixed version | 1.1.2 |
CVSS Score | 5.9 |
CVSS Vector | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L |
Description
Impact
A bug was found in runc where
runc exec --cap
executed processes with non-empty inheritable Linux process capabilities, creating an atypical Linux environment and enabling programs with inheritable file capabilities to elevate those capabilities to the permitted set during execve(2).This bug did not affect the container security sandbox as the inheritable set never contained more capabilities than were included in the container's bounding set.
Patches
This bug has been fixed in runc 1.1.2. Users should update to this version as soon as possible.
This fix changes
runc exec --cap
behavior such that the additional capabilities granted to the process being executed (as specified via--cap
arguments) do not include inheritable capabilities.In addition,
runc spec
is changed to not set any inheritable capabilities in the created example OCI spec (config.json
) file.Credits
The opencontainers project would like to thank Andrew G. Morgan for responsibly disclosing this issue in accordance with the opencontainers org security policy.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue
- Email us at [email protected] if you think you’ve found a security bug
Race Condition Enabling Link Following
Affected range | <1.1.14 |
Fixed version | 1.1.14 |
CVSS Score | 3.6 |
CVSS Vector | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N |
Description
Impact
runc 1.1.13 and earlier as well as 1.2.0-rc2 and earlier can be tricked into
creating empty files or directories in arbitrary locations in the host
filesystem by sharing a volume between two containers and exploiting a race
with os.MkdirAll. While this can be used to create empty files, existing
files will not be truncated.An attacker must have the ability to start containers using some kind of custom
volume configuration. Containers using user namespaces are still affected, but
the scope of places an attacker can create inodes can be significantly reduced.
Sufficiently strict LSM policies (SELinux/Apparmor) can also in principle block
this attack -- we suspect the industry standard SELinux policy may restrict
this attack's scope but the exact scope of protection hasn't been analysed.This is exploitable using runc directly as well as through Docker and
Kubernetes.The CVSS score for this vulnerability is
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N (Low severity, 3.6).Workarounds
Using user namespaces restricts this attack fairly significantly such that the
attacker can only create inodes in directories that the remapped root
user/group has write access to. Unless the root user is remapped to an actual
user on the host (such as with rootless containers that don't use
/etc/sub[ug]id), this in practice means that an attacker would only be able to
create inodes in world-writable directories.A strict enough SELinux or AppArmor policy could in principle also restrict the
scope if a specific label is applied to the runc runtime, though we haven't
thoroughly tested to what extent the standard existing policies block this
attack nor what exact policies are needed to sufficiently restrict this attack.Patches
Fixed in runc v1.1.14 and v1.2.0-rc3.
main
patches:release-1.1
patches:Credits
Thanks to Rodrigo Campos Catelin (@rata) and Alban Crequy (@alban) from
Microsoft for discovering and reporting this vulnerability.
Improper Preservation of Permissions
Affected range | <1.1.5 |
Fixed version | 1.1.5 |
CVSS Score | 2.5 |
CVSS Vector | CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L |
Description
Impact
It was found that rootless runc makes
/sys/fs/cgroup
writable in following conditons:
- when runc is executed inside the user namespace, and the
config.json
does not specify the cgroup namespace to be unshared (e.g..,(docker|podman|nerdctl) run --cgroupns=host
, with Rootless Docker/Podman/nerdctl)- or, when runc is executed outside the user namespace, and
/sys
is mounted withrbind, ro
(e.g.,runc spec --rootless
; this condition is very rare)A container may gain the write access to user-owned cgroup hierarchy
/sys/fs/cgroup/user.slice/...
on the host .
Other users's cgroup hierarchies are not affected.Patches
v1.1.5 (planned)
Workarounds
- Condition 1: Unshare the cgroup namespace (
(docker|podman|nerdctl) run --cgroupns=private)
. This is the default behavior of Docker/Podman/nerdctl on cgroup v2 hosts.- Condition 2 (very rare): add
/sys/fs/cgroup
tomaskedPaths
Attempting automerge. See https://github.com/uniget-org/tools/actions/runs/11220084937. |
PR is clean and can be merged. See https://github.com/uniget-org/tools/actions/runs/11220084937. |
This PR contains the following updates:
5.2.3
->5.2.4
Warning
Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.
Release Notes
containers/podman (containers/podman)
v5.2.4
Compare Source
Security
RUN --mount
arguments to a Dockerfile being built.Misc
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.