-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"Search" Functionality #4
Comments
Hi, I like to do this task but if we want to use the promptui and make a seach for it, then it will be like this pic |
Hi @azibom , Many thanks :), I really appreciate if you do this task. I could not see the pic you linked in the comment. Can you please check it? |
Hi @umutphp, That is the first pic which is in the main page of the promptui (https://github.com/manifoldco/promptui) (and try to search "jajapeno") |
ok :). It is ok for me to use promtui for interface. But the main question is that what we will use for search service. A local storage or a service? |
So you want to fetch all names and then search on it? , I thought you just want to search in the chosen layer |
Oh, your idea is better than mine :). I think searching in the chosen layer will be very very ok. It is a pity for me that I did not thought in the way before :). |
Hi @azibom , Any update or any question to discuss about the topic? I do not want to bother you, but this feature feature will be a valuable addition to the tool. |
Hi |
Hi @azibom , When I created this issue, there were two kinds of search in my mind. First one is the one you explained in your former comment, a search in all of the awesome tree recursively. The second one is a quick search in the first layer of the existing tree node so that user should not walk through all the list to find the list. Let me explain both of the options and my opinions. Option 1 Search In all Awesome Three Option 2 Search In Existing Node To sum up, I think It is more feasible to implement the second option. |
It is not a must-do task but needs to be discussed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: