Update pre-commit, store tagger scores as structured array

[samvanstroud]

Summary

This pull request introduces the following changes

• Update pre-commit consolidating to ruff
• store tagger scores as structured array

Relates to the following issues

• closes Use Ruff and pre-commit.ci #166

Conformity

• Changelog entry
• Documentation

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #177 (12483d8) into main (b233f47) will increase coverage by 0.07%.
The diff coverage is 97.97%.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #177      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.66%   96.73%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          32       32              
  Lines        2880     2881       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         2784     2787       +3     
+ Misses         96       94       -2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
puma/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
puma/metrics.py	96.49% <ø> (ø)
puma/tests/utils/test_logging.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
puma/utils/logging.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
puma/hlplots/tagger.py	94.80% <90.90%> (+0.97%)	⬆️
puma/hlplots/results.py	90.00% <94.44%> (ø)
puma/histogram.py	95.31% <100.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
puma/hlplots/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
puma/line_plot_2d.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
puma/pie.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 22 more

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[samvanstroud]

Could I get a review from one of @afroch @dkobylianskii @philippgadow? there are a lot of changes but they are almost all automatic fixes from the updated linting, so I don't think this needs to be scrutinised too closely.

[afroch]

I guess it looks fine to me. Maybe we can set the max line length again to 88. But just a small thing that I wanted to bring up

[dkobylianskii]

For me, it looks fine
Thanks, Sam

[samvanstroud]

@afroch @dkobylianskii thanks for taking a look. The suggestions have been implemented, if you are able to approve that would be great!