Support Xbb in high level API

[samvanstroud]

Relates to the following issues

• Follow-up for high level API #140
• Improve Xbb Support #148

Conformity

• Changelog entry
• Documentation

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #157 (991fb3e) into main (4cf40b3) will decrease coverage by 0.28%.
The diff coverage is 76.66%.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #157      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.70%   95.43%   -0.28%     
==========================================
  Files          30       30              
  Lines        2632     2628       -4     
==========================================
- Hits         2519     2508      -11     
- Misses        113      120       +7     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
puma/tests/utils/test_utils.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
puma/utils/__init__.py	71.05% <ø> (ø)
puma/hlplots/results.py	74.60% <64.70%> (-7.81%)	⬇️
puma/hlplots/tagger.py	94.36% <76.92%> (-3.97%)	⬇️
puma/plot_base.py	88.28% <83.33%> (+2.34%)	⬆️
puma/roc.py	93.65% <85.71%> (-0.14%)	⬇️
puma/histogram.py	95.83% <100.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
puma/tests/hlplots/test_results.py	93.22% <100.00%> (ø)
puma/tests/test_histogram.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
puma/var_vs_eff.py	92.79% <100.00%> (-0.04%)	⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[afroch]

Hi @samvanstroud. PR looks good to me. The only think that could be fixed is the code coverage. Otherwise it's good to go

[samvanstroud]

Hi @samvanstroud. PR looks good to me. The only think that could be fixed is the code coverage. Otherwise it's good to go

Thanks for taking a look @afroch, this was due to a badly named test, should be fixed now