Updated land perturbation scheme#176
Merged
junwang-noaa merged 45 commits intoAug 31, 2020
Merged
Conversation
… variables are in generic (i.e., variable agnostic) arrays
Collaborator
|
@ClaraDraper-NOAA There are some major changes to the stochastic physics repo (and fv3_atm) that are going in today. I am not sure how much this will affect your PR. But you probably want to take a look soon. |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for the heads up, I'll have a look on Monday.
…On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 8:58 AM Phil Pegion ***@***.***> wrote:
@ClaraDraper-NOAA <https://github.com/ClaraDraper-NOAA> There are some
major changes to the stochastic physics repo (and fv3_atm) that are going
in today. I am not sure how much this will affect your PR. But you probably
want to take a look soon.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#176 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH7BYDZTIWIEDLD7VW44UFLR7LAINANCNFSM4PJJMUAQ>
.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Clara Draper
CIRES / NOAA Earth System Research Laboratories
Physical Sciences Laboratory
325 Broadway, Boulder, CO
DSRC, Rm 1D-105
+1 303 497 4467
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Collaborator
|
All regression tests have passed. I will start by merging the ccpp-physics PR. |
junwang-noaa
approved these changes
Aug 31, 2020
| path = stochastic_physics | ||
| url = https://github.com/noaa-psd/stochastic_physics | ||
| branch = master | ||
| branch = master |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would you please remove the extra space and extra line below?
climbfuji
approved these changes
Aug 31, 2020
Collaborator
climbfuji
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved. Since @ClaraDraper-NOAA is out for the rest of the day, I suggest to merge the PR as-is and fix the extra whitespaces / new line in the next commit.
Collaborator
|
It's OK to me.
…On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:35 AM Dom Heinzeller ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** approved this pull request.
Approved. Since @ClaraDraper-NOAA <https://github.com/ClaraDraper-NOAA>
is out for the rest of the day, I suggest to merge the PR as-is and fix the
extra whitespaces / new line in the next commit.
—
You are receiving this because your review was requested.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#176 (review)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI7D6TKYMC5JNXDDA7RT643SDO7MVANCNFSM4PJJMUAQ>
.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Clean up of the pre-existing land perturbation scheme (was called with do_sfcperts) that was intended for use with GEFS forecasts. This scheme is not being used, and needed some clean-up to work robustly. This scheme has been retained as lndp_type=1 (output is zero diff to old scheme) – think about removing in the future?
Addition of new land surface perturbation option (lndp_type=2), intended for use in cycling DA, and designed to sit outside of the forecast model code.
Regressions tests have passed on hera, and I’ve added a fv3_ccpp_lndp regression test for the lndp_type=2 option.
Detailed list of changes:
In stochastic physics:
*For lndp_type=2, added capacity to apply land perturbations throughout forecast (do_advance_pattern), and to include the land perturbations in the stochini file.
Also, fixed a couple of minor bugs, most notably:
*added missing error trapping in stochastic physics (may not have done this everywhere that is necessary).
In FV3:
*merged run_stochastic_physics_sfc routine into run_stochastic_physics
In ccpp/physics:
*variable name updates
In UFS:
• Updated variable names in namelists
• Addition of lndp test
ASSOCIATED PULL REQUESTS:
stochastic_physics 28
ccpp-physics 480
fv3atm 148
ufs-weather-model 176