[develop] Remove Slurm Memory Option for noaacloud

[EdwardSnyder-NOAA]

DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES:

Added logic to not include the slurm memory option for our NOAA cloud platforms. Testing the development branch of the SRW App on NOAA cloud platforms revealed this error:
"FV3LAM_wflow.xml :: sbatch: error: Memory specification can not be satisfied"

Slurm on NOAA cloud wasn't setup like the rest of the RDHPCs, so there isn't a good way to configure its memory. Removing the slurm memory option allows for the experiment to complete successfully.

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

TESTS CONDUCTED:

• hera.intel
• orion.intel
• cheyenne.intel
• cheyenne.gnu
• gaea.intel
• jet.intel
• wcoss2.intel
• NOAA Cloud (indicate which platform)
• Azure and GCP
• Jenkins
• fundamental test suite
• comprehensive tests (specify which if a subset was used)

DEPENDENCIES:

DOCUMENTATION:

ISSUE:

The slurm memory logic was reported in Issue #349 and was addressed in PR #443.

CHECKLIST

• My code follows the style guidelines in the Contributor's Guide
• I have performed a self-review of my own code using the Code Reviewer's Guide
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• My changes need updates to the documentation. I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes do not require updates to the documentation (explain).
• My changes generate no new warnings
• New and existing tests pass with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published

LABELS (optional):

A Code Manager needs to add the following labels to this PR:

• Work In Progress
• bug
• enhancement
• documentation
• release
• high priority
• run_ci
• run_we2e_fundamental_tests
• run_we2e_comprehensive_tests
• Needs Cheyenne test
• Needs Jet test
• Needs Hera test
• Needs Orion test
• help wanted

CONTRIBUTORS (optional):

Discussed with @danielabdi-noaa the origins of the Issue and PR.

[MichaelLueken]

@EdwardSnyder-NOAA These changes look good to me! Tests were run on Gaea to ensure continued functionality. All tests passed successfully. Approving now.