[release/public-v2] fixes for cheyenne and addition of FV3_WoFS_v0 to build#305
Conversation
|
My initial test of this failed for Intel on Cheyenne: I'm going to retry in a fresh login shell to rule out any funny business with previous things I was doing. |
christopherwharrop-noaa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My initial failed test was due to a corrupted environment from previous work in the same shell. A retest of Intel build worked fine, and the gnu build also worked.
I am curious why the GNU build for the release is using version 11.2 while develop is using 10.1. I would normally expect new versions to be used on develop first, before being applied to a release, but I'm assuming there is some good explanation for that, and I'm curious to know what it is.
The explanation is probably not as good as would be desired, but it came down to the fact that we had gotten module files updated for 11.2 before the modules were updated for 10.1, so I made the switch. While testing with 10.1 later, I also ran into some problems during the forecast, which I haven't had time to figure out. Fortunately, no problems with 11.2. |
Fixes modules for Cheyenne.