Skip to content

Tenth reconciliation PR from production/RRFS.v1#252

Merged
rhaesung merged 27 commits into
ufs-community:ufs/devfrom
grantfirl:rrfsv1-to-ufs/dev10
Feb 19, 2025
Merged

Tenth reconciliation PR from production/RRFS.v1#252
rhaesung merged 27 commits into
ufs-community:ufs/devfrom
grantfirl:rrfsv1-to-ufs/dev10

Conversation

@grantfirl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This work is from @JiliDong-NOAA and is identical to PR #225. The description for that PR is pasted below:

This PR follows Jongil's suggestion and aims to reduce the large convective reflectivity caused by saSAS adjustment in the first timestep during a warm start. The issue is likely related to the inconsistency when DA updates the moisture at t but not the moisture from the previous timestep (t-36s). The moisture from the previous timestep is needed for initializing sigmab (updraft area fraction) when calculating qadv (q advection or tendency term).

The PR forces qadv to zero in the first timestep when a namelist parameter sigmab_coldstart is set to .true. It also reduces the lower limit of sigmab from 0.01 to 0.0 in the first timestep.

sigmab_modification.pptx

haiqinli and others added 23 commits March 5, 2024 03:32
[production/RRFS.v1] Thompson-Eidhammer microphysics code formatting
[production/RRFS.v1] Update MYNN PBL & Smoke for RRFS.v1
[production/RRFS.v1] Fix improperly assigned fire emissions for ebb_dcycle==1 for retrospectives (NOT operational!)
…clrskyflx_diag

[production/RRFS.v1] Add clear-sky shortwave downward at surface flux to available diagnostics.
[production/RRFS.v1] update deep soil temperature of RUC LSM
[production/RRFS.v1] add a new parameter to control if G-F cold starts or not
Comment thread physics/CONV/progsigma_calc.f90 Outdated
@jkbk2004
Copy link
Copy Markdown

All tests are done at ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#2597. @rhaesung @grantfirl @dustinswales can you merge this pr?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants