Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updates needed for xsede groupbys #1288

Merged

Conversation

plessbd
Copy link
Contributor

@plessbd plessbd commented Apr 21, 2020

The XSEDE GroupBys need to be able to use a secondary table to link to aggregates (through the account table to the grant table) this update allows that, while getting rid of the need for the attribute_table key as it is provided by the first (and usually only) join table in the attributes value query.

@plessbd plessbd force-pushed the gb-support-alternate-attribute-table branch from ca53939 to b3df0cd Compare April 21, 2020 22:55
@plessbd plessbd force-pushed the gb-support-alternate-attribute-table branch 4 times, most recently from bd05806 to 73e627d Compare April 30, 2020 15:24
@plessbd plessbd force-pushed the gb-support-alternate-attribute-table branch from 73e627d to 1fdf018 Compare April 30, 2020 15:25
@plessbd plessbd force-pushed the gb-support-alternate-attribute-table branch from 1fdf018 to b9dd3de Compare May 1, 2020 16:44
@plessbd plessbd merged commit 97648ee into ubccr:xdmod9.0 May 4, 2020
@plessbd plessbd deleted the gb-support-alternate-attribute-table branch May 4, 2020 15:02
jpwhite4 added a commit to jpwhite4/xdmod that referenced this pull request May 29, 2020
This change fixes an issue seen with the group by Grant Type in the XSEDE realm.
and is seen when using a group by configuration that has multiple joins and the
dimension table primary key is not stored in the fact tables.

See pull ubccr#1288 for more context.
@jtpalmer jtpalmer added this to the 9.0.0 milestone Aug 10, 2020
@jtpalmer jtpalmer added autodoc:ignore Auto documentation ignore this PR Category:General General enhancement Enhancement of the functionality of an existing feature labels Aug 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
autodoc:ignore Auto documentation ignore this PR Category:General General enhancement Enhancement of the functionality of an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants