Skip to content

Conversation

@bpholt
Copy link
Member

@bpholt bpholt commented Oct 7, 2025

…due to high false positive rate in Typelevel-style code.

Implements @som-snytt's recommendation in scala/bug#13128 (comment).

…due to high false positive rate in Typelevel-style code
@mergify mergify bot added the settings label Oct 7, 2025
@bpholt
Copy link
Member Author

bpholt commented Oct 9, 2025

@armanbilge do you have any other feedback? It would be nice to merge and release this so it can start helping unblock Scala version PRs.

Copy link
Member

@armanbilge armanbilge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bpholt thanks for the ping! Merging and releasing, also if you want to make a follow-up issue reminding us to revisit this after a future Scala 2.13 release, thanks!

@armanbilge armanbilge merged commit dabece7 into typelevel:main Oct 9, 2025
14 checks passed
@bpholt bpholt deleted the kind-poly-nothing-false-positives branch October 9, 2025 23:46
mzuehlke added a commit to scala-steward/scala-steward that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2025
mzuehlke added a commit to scala-steward/scala-steward that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2025
@bpholt
Copy link
Member Author

bpholt commented Oct 13, 2025

I added #842 to remind us to revisit this in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants