Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix incorrect handling of orphan fragment names consists of only digits #588
Fix incorrect handling of orphan fragment names consists of only digits #588
Changes from all commits
26b1d04
d9b4139
5d732ca
6bd47e4
d941865
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you add another non-orphan test with an identifier looking like a commit sha? In the templates I've started using recently, I try to output PRs/issues, commits and arbitrary identifiers separately: https://github.com/cherrypy/cheroot/blob/3591a1c/docs/changelog-fragments.d/.towncrier-template.rst.j2#L59-L63.
It'd be nice if that remained functional. Hence an explicit test...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd say that should be a separate PR -- that's an interesting functional test but not really tied to the changes being made here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason I brought it up is that I wasn't sure if this PR influences it. So it's kinda related as a possible regression. But I understand that it may be non-atomic and separate otherwise.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your feedback.
This test is named
test_orphan_all_digits
. Based on that, I think that+123
is ok.I also think that using a git commit ref is also a valid test... but it should be a separate test.