-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplify multi-object picker logic with search #8010
Merged
Merged
+214
−514
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ijreilly
changed the title
Simplify multi-object picker logic
Simplify multi-object picker logic with search
Oct 24, 2024
...rd/record-field/meta-types/input/components/RelationFromManyFieldInputMultiRecordsEffect.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
import { RelationPickerScopeInternalContext } from '@/object-record/relation-picker/scopes/scope-internal-context/RelationPickerScopeInternalContext'; | ||
import { useAvailableScopeIdOrThrow } from '@/ui/utilities/recoil-scope/scopes-internal/hooks/useAvailableScopeId'; | ||
import { isDeeplyEqual } from '~/utils/isDeeplyEqual'; | ||
|
||
export type SelectedObjectRecordId = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we extract this type ?
import { isObjectMetadataItemSearchableInCombinedRequest } from '@/object-record/utils/isObjectMetadataItemSearchableInCombinedRequest'; | ||
import { isDefined } from '~/utils/isDefined'; | ||
|
||
export const formatSearchResults = ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we extract this util and call it inside useMultiObjectRecordsQueryResultFormattedAsObjectRecordForSelectArray
?
lucasbordeau
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Simplifying the logic around multi-object pickers and search by getting rid of the behaviour that keeped selected elements even when they did not match the search filter (eg keeping selected record "Brian Chesky" in dropdown even when search input is "Qonto"). This allows us to simplify the fetch queries around the search to only do one query.