Update Dynamic APIs to be async #1849
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve the introduction of a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App
participant IconLibrary
User->>App: Interacts with UI
App->>IconLibrary: Fetches icon
IconLibrary-->>App: Returns new icon
App->>User: Updates UI with new icon
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (56)
apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/page.tsx (1)
11-11: Approved:AIPagefunction updated to handle asyncsearchParamsThe change correctly adapts the
AIPagefunction to work with the new Promise-basedsearchParams. The use ofawaitensures that thelocaleis properly extracted before being used.Consider destructuring
searchParamsdirectly in the function parameters for a slight optimization:-export default async function AIPage({ searchParams }: Props) { - const { lang: locale } = await searchParams; +export default async function AIPage({ searchParams }: Props) { + const { lang: locale } = await searchParams;This change would eliminate the need for an intermediate variable and make the code slightly more concise.
apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/server-menu.tsx (2)
6-6: Approve the change to asynccreateClient, but consider error handling and performance.The modification to await
createClient()aligns with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This change is consistent with the existing asynchronous pattern in the function.However, consider the following points:
Error Handling: With the introduction of an additional asynchronous operation, it's important to implement proper error handling. Consider wrapping the function body in a try-catch block to gracefully handle any potential errors from
createClient().Performance: The addition of another
awaitstatement could potentially impact the function's performance. IfcreateClient()is called frequently, consider memoizing its result or moving it to a higher level in the component tree to reduce unnecessary client creation.Here's a suggested refactor to address these points:
import { cache } from 'react' import Menu from './menu'; import { getCurrentUser } from '@/lib/user-helper'; import { createClient } from '@/utils/supabase/server'; const getSupabaseClient = cache(() => createClient()) export default async function ServerMenu() { try { const supabase = await getSupabaseClient(); const { data: { user: sbUser }, } = await supabase.auth.getUser(); const user = await getCurrentUser(true); return <Menu sbUser={sbUser} user={user} />; } catch (error) { console.error('Error in ServerMenu:', error); // Handle the error appropriately, e.g., return an error component return <div>An error occurred. Please try again later.</div>; } }This refactor introduces error handling and uses React's
cachefunction to memoize the Supabase client creation, potentially improving performance.
Inconsistent usage of
createClient()across the codebaseThe verification process has revealed significant inconsistencies in the usage of
createClient()across the codebase:
In the rewise app:
- 27 instances of correct usage with
await createClient()- 4 instances of incorrect usage without
awaitIn the web app:
- 4 instances of correct usage with
await createClient()- 265 instances of incorrect usage without
awaitThe
createClient()function is not defined as async in either app:
apps/web/src/utils/supabase/server.ts:export function createClient() {apps/rewise/src/utils/supabase/server.ts:export function createClient() {These findings indicate that the change to make
createClient()async has not been consistently applied throughout the codebase. The rewise app has made more progress in updating the usage, but it's not complete. The web app, in particular, requires extensive updates to itscreateClient()calls.To resolve this issue:
- Update the
createClient()function definition to be async in both apps.- Systematically review and update all instances of
createClient()usage in both apps to useawait.- Ensure that functions calling
createClient()are also made async and that the async chain is propagated up the call stack as needed.This inconsistency could lead to potential runtime errors and unexpected behavior. A comprehensive update of the codebase is necessary to ensure proper async/await usage with
createClient().🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-15: Verify consistency of asynccreateClientusage across the codebaseTo ensure that this change is consistently applied throughout the project and doesn't introduce any breaking changes, it's important to verify other occurrences of
createClient().Run the following script to check for other usages of
createClient():Please review the results to ensure that all occurrences of
createClient()are properly awaited and that this change doesn't introduce any inconsistencies or breaking changes in other parts of the application.
To gather more specific information about the usage of
createClient()across the codebase, I'll generate some targeted search scripts.
I apologize for the oversight in the previous scripts. Let's modify our approach to properly handle TypeScript and TypeScript React files.
These modified scripts should properly search through both .ts and .tsx files, allowing us to gather the necessary information about the usage of
createClient()across the codebase.
I apologize for the continued issues. Let's simplify our approach and try one more time with a more straightforward set of commands.
These commands should work correctly by specifying the file extensions directly and using the correct syntax for the --type-add option. This should allow us to search through both .ts and .tsx files for the usage and definition of
createClient().🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of createClient() in TypeScript and JavaScript files # Search for createClient() usage echo "Searching for createClient() usage:" rg --type-add 'web:*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' -t web 'createClient\(\)' -C 3 # Search for potential missed await keywords echo "\nSearching for potential missed await keywords:" rg --type-add 'web:*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}' -t web 'const\s+\w+\s*=\s*createClient\(\)' -C 3Length of output: 444146
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for correct usage of await createClient() echo "Correct usage of await createClient():" rg "await\s+createClient\(\)" --type ts --type tsx # Search for incorrect usage of createClient() without await echo "\nIncorrect usage of createClient() without await:" rg "const\s+\w+\s*=\s*createClient\(\)" --type ts --type tsx # Check the definition of createClient() function echo "\nDefinition of createClient() function:" rg "export\s+(async\s+)?function\s+createClient" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 560
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Define custom file type for TypeScript and TypeScript React files RG_OPTS="--type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}'" # Search for correct usage of await createClient() echo "Correct usage of await createClient():" rg $RG_OPTS "await\s+createClient\(\)" -t ts # Search for incorrect usage of createClient() without await echo "\nIncorrect usage of createClient() without await:" rg $RG_OPTS "const\s+\w+\s*=\s*createClient\(\)" -t ts # Check the definition of createClient() function echo "\nDefinition of createClient() function:" rg $RG_OPTS "export\s+(async\s+)?function\s+createClient" -t tsLength of output: 761
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for correct usage of await createClient() echo "Correct usage of await createClient():" rg "await\s+createClient\(\)" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -g '*.{ts,tsx}' # Search for incorrect usage of createClient() without await echo "\nIncorrect usage of createClient() without await:" rg "const\s+\w+\s*=\s*createClient\(\)" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -g '*.{ts,tsx}' # Check the definition of createClient() function echo "\nDefinition of createClient() function:" rg "export\s+(async\s+)?function\s+createClient" --type-add 'ts:*.{ts,tsx}' -g '*.{ts,tsx}'Length of output: 37055
apps/rewise/src/app/api/auth/email/route.ts (2)
Line range hint
14-14: Consider adding email validationWhile the function extracts the email from the request body, it doesn't perform any validation on the email format. Consider adding email validation to ensure the input is a valid email address before attempting to update it.
Here's a simple regex-based email validation you could add:
const { email } = await req.json(); const emailRegex = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/; if (!emailRegex.test(email)) { return NextResponse.json({ message: 'Invalid email format' }, { status: 400 }); }
Line range hint
18-21: Improve error message specificityThe current error message for update failures is generic. Consider including more specific error information to aid in debugging and provide better feedback to the client.
You could modify the error response to include the specific error message from Supabase:
if (error) { return NextResponse.json( { message: 'Error updating user', error: error.message }, { status: 500 } ); }apps/rewise/src/app/api/auth/callback/route.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-19: Consider enhancing error handling and redirection logic.While the current implementation is functional, consider the following improvements:
- Add error handling for the
supabase.auth.exchangeCodeForSession(code)call.- Implement conditional redirection based on the success or failure of the authentication process.
Here's a suggested implementation:
import { createClient } from '@/utils/supabase/server'; import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'; export async function GET(request: Request) { const requestUrl = new URL(request.url); const code = requestUrl.searchParams.get('code'); if (code) { try { const supabase = await createClient(); await supabase.auth.exchangeCodeForSession(code); // Redirect to a success page or dashboard return NextResponse.redirect(`${requestUrl.origin}/dashboard`); } catch (error) { console.error('Error exchanging code for session:', error); // Redirect to an error page return NextResponse.redirect(`${requestUrl.origin}/auth-error`); } } // If no code is present, redirect to the home page return NextResponse.redirect(requestUrl.origin); }This implementation provides better error handling and more specific redirections based on the outcome of the authentication process.
apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/navbar-actions.tsx (1)
Line range hint
13-16: Consider adding error handling and reviewing prop usageWhile the main logic of the component looks good, there are two areas for potential improvement:
- Error Handling: Add error handling for the
getUser()call.- Prop Usage: The
hideMetadataprop is not used directly in this component, only passed down toUserNavWrapper.Consider refactoring the code to include error handling and clarify prop usage:
- const { - data: { user: sbUser }, - } = await supabase.auth.getUser(); + let sbUser; + try { + const { data: { user } } = await supabase.auth.getUser(); + sbUser = user; + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to get user:', error); + // Consider how to handle this error in the UI + } + // If hideMetadata is only used in UserNavWrapper, consider removing it from NavbarActions props + // and passing it directly where UserNavWrapper is rendered return ( <div className="relative"> <div className="flex items-center gap-1"> - {sbUser ? ( + {sbUser ? ( <> <UserNavWrapper hideMetadata={hideMetadata} /> </> ) : ( <> <LanguageWrapper /> <ThemeToggle /> </> )} </div> </div> );This refactoring adds error handling for the
getUser()call and suggests reconsidering thehideMetadataprop usage.Also applies to: 20-32
apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/_components/language-wrapper.tsx (2)
11-12: Approved: Async cookie retrieval implemented correctly.The change to async cookie retrieval aligns well with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This modification should contribute to improved responsiveness and performance of the application.
Consider using the
cookiesfunction directly in the declaration to make the code more concise:-export async function LanguageWrapper({ label, locale }: Props) { - const cookies = await c(); +export async function LanguageWrapper({ label, locale }: Props) { + const cookies = c();This change is possible because
cookies()fromnext/headersalready returns theReadonlyRequestCookiesobject synchronously, and its methods (likeget()) work withoutawait.
Inconsistent Usage of
cookiesRetrieval DetectedMultiple instances of
cookiesretrieval use both synchronousc()and asynchronousawait c(). Please ensure consistent usage across the codebase to prevent potential issues.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
14-29: Verify: Correct usage of retrieved cookies object.The rest of the function correctly uses the
cookiesobject retrieved asynchronously. Thecookies.get()method is used withoutawait, which is correct as it's a synchronous operation. The overall logic and behavior of the function remain unchanged, ensuring that the async update doesn't introduce any unintended side effects.To ensure that this change is consistent across the codebase, let's check for other occurrences of cookie retrieval:
This will help us identify if there are any inconsistencies in cookie retrieval methods across the codebase that might need attention.
Correction Needed: Update Shell Script to Use File Extensions
The previous script failed because
rgdoes not recognizetypescriptas a valid file type. Please use file extensions instead to search for cookie retrieval patterns andLOCALE_COOKIE_NAMEusage.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of cookie retrieval in the codebase # Search for cookie retrieval patterns echo "Searching for cookie retrieval patterns:" rg --type typescript --type javascript -e "cookies\(\)" -e "c\(\)" -e "await.*cookies" -e "await.*c\(" -C 3 # Search for LOCALE_COOKIE_NAME usage echo "Searching for LOCALE_COOKIE_NAME usage:" rg --type typescript --type javascript "LOCALE_COOKIE_NAME" -C 3Length of output: 424
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of cookie retrieval in the codebase using file extensions # Search for cookie retrieval patterns echo "Searching for cookie retrieval patterns:" rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.js" -g "*.jsx" -e "cookies\(\)" -e "c\(\)" -e "await.*cookies" -e "await.*c\(" -C 3 # Search for LOCALE_COOKIE_NAME usage echo "Searching for LOCALE_COOKIE_NAME usage:" rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.js" -g "*.jsx" "LOCALE_COOKIE_NAME" -C 3Length of output: 36146
apps/rewise/src/app/api/v1/infrastructure/languages/route.ts (3)
6-7: LGTM! Consider using destructuring for clarity.The change to use
await c()is correct and aligns with the PR objectives of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This ensures proper handling of asynchronous cookie retrieval.For improved readability, consider using destructuring:
- const cookies = await c(); + const { set } = await c();Then update line 27 to:
- cookies.set(LOCALE_COOKIE_NAME, locale); + set(LOCALE_COOKIE_NAME, locale);This makes it clearer which method from the cookies object is being used.
30-31: LGTM! Consider using destructuring for consistency.The change to use
await c()is correct and aligns with the PR objectives of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This ensures proper handling of asynchronous cookie retrieval.For consistency with the previous suggestion and improved readability, consider using destructuring:
- const cookies = await c(); + const { delete: deleteCookie } = await c();Then update line 33 to:
- cookies.delete(LOCALE_COOKIE_NAME); + deleteCookie(LOCALE_COOKIE_NAME);This makes it clearer which method from the cookies object is being used and avoids the use of the reserved keyword 'delete'.
Line range hint
30-35: Consider adding error handling to the DELETE function.While the changes made are correct, the DELETE function lacks error handling unlike the POST function. To improve robustness and consistency, consider adding error handling to the DELETE function as well.
Here's a suggested implementation:
export async function DELETE() { try { const { delete: deleteCookie } = await c(); deleteCookie(LOCALE_COOKIE_NAME); return NextResponse.json({ message: 'Success' }); } catch (error) { console.error('Error deleting locale cookie:', error); return NextResponse.json( { message: 'Failed to delete locale cookie' }, { status: 500 } ); } }This change will ensure that any errors during the cookie deletion process are caught and handled appropriately, providing a more robust API endpoint.
apps/rewise/src/lib/user-helper.ts (2)
Line range hint
5-13: LGTM! Consider performance impact.The change to make
createClient()asynchronous aligns with the PR objective. The function correctly usesawaitfor both client creation and user retrieval.Consider the potential performance impact of this change. If
getCurrentSupabaseUseris called frequently, you might want to implement caching or memoization to reduce the overhead of creating a new client for each call.
Line range hint
15-40: LGTM! Consider performance optimization.The change to make
createClient()asynchronous aligns with the PR objective. The function correctly usesawaitfor all asynchronous operations and includes proper error handling.As this function performs multiple asynchronous operations (client creation, user retrieval, and database query), consider implementing caching or memoization to optimize performance, especially if it's called frequently. Additionally, you might want to explore using Supabase's realtime subscriptions for user data if real-time updates are needed.
apps/rewise/src/app/api/auth/otp/verify/route.ts (2)
14-14: Approved: Async client creation aligns with PR objectives.The change to use
awaitwithcreateClient()is correct and aligns with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This suggests thatcreateClient()now returns a Promise, which is properly handled.Consider adding error handling for the
createClient()call:let supabase; try { supabase = await createClient(); } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to create Supabase client:', error); return NextResponse.json({ error: 'Internal server error' }, { status: 500 }); }This will ensure that any errors during client creation are properly caught and reported.
Line range hint
7-7: Enhance type safety for request bodyTo improve type safety and make the code more self-documenting, consider adding an interface for the request body.
Add the following interface before the POST function:
interface OtpVerificationRequest { email: string; otp: string; }Then update the POST function signature:
export async function POST(request: Request) { const requestUrl = new URL(request.url); const { email, otp }: OtpVerificationRequest = await request.json(); // ... rest of the function }This will provide better type checking and make the expected request structure clear to other developers.
apps/rewise/src/utils/supabase/server.ts (3)
Line range hint
7-19: LGTM: Updated createCookieHandler parameter type.The change from
ReturnType<typeof cookies>toReadonlyRequestCookiesimproves type safety and aligns with Next.js conventions. The function's behavior remains unchanged, ensuring compatibility.Consider adding a JSDoc comment to describe the function's purpose and parameters:
/** * Creates a cookie handler for Supabase client. * @param cookieStore - The Next.js ReadonlyRequestCookies object. * @returns An object with methods to get and set cookies. */ function createCookieHandler(cookieStore: ReadonlyRequestCookies) { // ... existing implementation ... }
Line range hint
1-49: Summary: Good progress on updating Dynamic APIs to be asyncThe changes in this file successfully update the Supabase client creation functions to be asynchronous, aligning with the PR objectives. The modifications also improve type safety and adhere to Next.js conventions.
As this is a breaking change, consider the following to ensure a smooth transition:
- Update all callers of these functions to handle the new async nature.
- Review error handling in the updated functions and their callers.
- Consider adding unit tests for the modified functions to ensure they behave as expected in various scenarios.
- Update any documentation or comments related to these functions to reflect their new async nature.
- If not already planned, consider creating a migration guide for other developers who might be using these functions in their code.
Inconsistent update of
createDynamicClientfunctionSeveral instances of
createDynamicClientare defined differently across the codebase:
apps/web/src/utils/supabase/server.tsdefinescreateDynamicClientas a synchronous function.apps/rewise/src/utils/supabase/server.tsdefinescreateDynamicClientas an asynchronous function.Please ensure all definitions are updated to asynchronous and adjust their usages accordingly to handle the asynchronous nature.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
43-49: LGTM: Updated createDynamicClient to be async and exported.The function is now asynchronous and exported, aligning with the PR objective. The
cookies()call is correctly awaited, consistent with the changes increateGenericClient.To ensure that all calls to
createDynamicClienthave been updated to handle the new async nature and that the export is being used correctly, please run the following script:Please review the results to ensure all imports and calls are properly updated to handle the async nature of the function.
To address the issue with the unrecognized file type, please run the following updated script to search for
createDynamicClientimports and calls:
Please run the following updated script to search for
createDynamicClientimports and calls across the entire repository:🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all imports and calls to createDynamicClient # Search for createDynamicClient imports echo "Searching for createDynamicClient imports:" rg --type typescript "import.*createDynamicClient" apps/ # Search for createDynamicClient calls echo "Searching for createDynamicClient calls:" rg --type typescript -A 3 "createDynamicClient\(" apps/Length of output: 372
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all imports and calls to createDynamicClient without relying on --type # Search for createDynamicClient imports echo "Searching for createDynamicClient imports:" rg "import.*createDynamicClient" 'apps/**/*.ts' 'apps/**/*.tsx' # Search for createDynamicClient calls echo "Searching for createDynamicClient calls:" rg -A 3 "createDynamicClient\(" 'apps/**/*.ts' 'apps/**/*.tsx'Length of output: 530
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all imports and calls to createDynamicClient in the entire repository # Search for createDynamicClient imports echo "Searching for createDynamicClient imports:" rg "import.*createDynamicClient" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' # Search for createDynamicClient calls echo "Searching for createDynamicClient calls:" rg -A 3 "createDynamicClient\(" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 2183
apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/chats/[chatId]/layout.tsx (1)
34-37: LGTM! Consider adding error handling.The changes to
generateMetadataare well-implemented, making it properly async and improving type safety with the explicitPromise<Metadata>return type.Consider adding error handling for the
paramsPromise:export const generateMetadata = async ({ params, }: Props): Promise<Metadata> => { - const { locale, chatId } = await params; + try { + const { locale, chatId } = await params; + // ... rest of the function + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error resolving params:', error); + return { + title: 'Error', + description: 'An error occurred while generating metadata.', + }; + }This change would make the function more robust by handling potential errors in the
paramsPromise.apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/layout.tsx (3)
9-9: Consider using a more descriptive name for the imported 'cookies' function.While shortening 'cookies' to 'c' saves some characters, it might reduce code readability. Consider using a more descriptive name like 'getCookies' or 'cookiesHandler' to maintain clarity, especially if this import is used across multiple files.
-import { cookies as c } from 'next/headers'; +import { cookies as getCookies } from 'next/headers';
17-19: Approval: Asynchronous params handling in Layout functionThe update to the Layout function signature correctly handles the Promise-based params, which is consistent with the LayoutProps interface change. This modification supports the shift towards asynchronous Dynamic APIs.
However, consider adding error handling for the params resolution:
export default async function Layout({ children, params }: LayoutProps) { - const { locale } = await params; + const { locale } = await params.catch(error => { + console.error('Failed to resolve params:', error); + return { locale: 'en' }; // Provide a default locale + });This addition will make the function more robust by handling potential errors in params resolution.
32-35: Approval: Asynchronous cookie handling with suggestionThe update to asynchronous cookie retrieval aligns well with the PR objectives. However, the use of 'c' as a function name might be confusing. Consider using a more descriptive name:
- const cookies = await c(); + const cookies = await getCookies(); const layout = cookies.get('react-resizable-panels:layout:rewise'); const collapsed = cookies.get('react-resizable-panels:collapsed');This change would improve code readability while maintaining the desired asynchronous behavior.
apps/rewise/src/app/api/auth/otp/send/route.ts (5)
13-13: LGTM! Consider adding error handling for client creation.The change to await the
createClient()function is correct and aligns with the asynchronous nature of the POST handler. This ensures that the Supabase client is fully initialized before it's used.Consider adding error handling for the client creation:
let supabase; try { supabase = await createClient(); } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to create Supabase client:', error); return NextResponse.json({ error: 'Internal Server Error' }, { status: 500 }); }This will make the code more robust by gracefully handling potential client creation failures.
64-64: LGTM! Consider adding error handling for admin client creation.The change to await the
createAdminClient()function is correct and aligns with the asynchronous nature of thecheckIfUserExistsfunction. This ensures that the Supabase admin client is fully initialized before it's used.Consider adding error handling for the admin client creation:
let sbAdmin; try { sbAdmin = await createAdminClient(); } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to create Supabase admin client:', error); throw new Error('Failed to check user existence'); }This will make the code more robust by gracefully handling potential admin client creation failures.
Line range hint
77-86: Consider improving password handling for new users.The
generateRandomPasswordfunction creates a random password for new users. While this approach works, it might not be the most secure or user-friendly method.Consider the following alternatives:
- Use a secure password generator library instead of a custom function.
- Implement a passwordless authentication flow, where users set their own password after clicking a link sent to their email.
- If you keep the current approach, ensure the generated password is securely communicated to the user and prompt them to change it on first login.
Example using a library (with
generate-password):import generatePassword from 'generate-password'; const generateSecurePassword = () => { return generatePassword.generate({ length: 16, numbers: true, symbols: true, uppercase: true, excludeSimilarCharacters: true, }); };
Line range hint
18-29: Improve error handling and avoid exposing error details.The current implementation directly exposes error messages from Supabase in the redirect URL. This could potentially reveal sensitive information about your system.
Consider creating a mapping of known error codes to user-friendly messages, and use a generic error message for unexpected errors. For example:
const getErrorMessage = (error: any) => { const errorMessages: Record<string, string> = { 'invalid-email': 'The provided email is invalid.', 'user-not-found': 'No account found with this email.', // Add more mappings as needed }; return errorMessages[error.message] || 'An unexpected error occurred. Please try again.'; }; // Then use it in your error handling: if (error) { const errorMessage = getErrorMessage(error); return NextResponse.redirect( `${requestUrl.origin}/login?error=${encodeURIComponent(errorMessage)}`, { status: 301 } ); }This approach provides more control over the error messages shown to users and prevents potential information leakage.
Also applies to: 36-47
Line range hint
25-29: Add a comment explaining the use of 301 status for POST to GET redirection.The use of a 301 status code for redirecting from a POST to a GET route is correct, but it might not be immediately clear why this is necessary.
Consider adding a more detailed comment explaining this choice:
return NextResponse.redirect(requestUrl.origin, { // Use 301 (Moved Permanently) to instruct the browser to change the request method // from POST to GET when following the redirect. This ensures that refreshing the // page or clicking the back button doesn't result in a POST request being resent. status: 301, });This comment provides more context about the reasoning behind using a 301 status code in this situation.
Also applies to: 43-47, 53-56
apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (2)
23-25: Approved: generateMetadata function updated to handle async paramsThe changes to
generateMetadatacorrectly implement the new asyncparamsstructure. The function is now properly marked as async and awaits theparamsPromise.Consider using Promise destructuring for a slightly more concise code:
export async function generateMetadata({ params }: Props): Promise<Metadata> { const { locale } = await params; // ... rest of the function }
102-103: Approved: RootLayout function updated to handle async paramsThe changes to
RootLayoutcorrectly implement the new asyncparamsstructure. The function is now properly marked as async and awaits theparamsPromise.Consider using Promise destructuring for a slightly more concise code:
export default async function RootLayout({ children, params }: Props) { const { locale } = await params; // ... rest of the function }apps/rewise/package.json (1)
48-48: Summary: Coordinated update of Next.js and related packagesThe changes in this file represent a coordinated update of Next.js and its related packages to the latest canary version (15.0.0-canary.171). This update aligns with the PR objectives and the mentioned related Next.js pull request.
Recommendations:
- Ensure comprehensive testing is performed, especially focusing on any features that rely on Next.js-specific functionality.
- Monitor the application closely after deployment for any unexpected behavior.
- Stay updated with the Next.js canary release notes for any breaking changes or new features that might affect your application.
- Consider setting up automated dependency update checks to stay current with these rapidly changing canary versions.
Also applies to: 65-65, 92-93
apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/google/new/route.ts (2)
Line range hint
24-92: Refactor POST function for improved structure and error handlingWhile the function is functional, consider the following improvements for better readability and maintainability:
- Centralize error handling to reduce duplication.
- Extract some operations into separate functions for better modularity.
- Improve robustness of environment variable usage.
Here's a suggested refactoring approach:
- Create a centralized error handling function:
function handleError(message: string, status: number = 500) { console.error(message); return NextResponse.json({ message }, { status }); }
- Extract the title generation logic into a separate function:
async function generateTitle(message: string, model: string) { const prompt = buildPrompt([ { id: 'initial-message', content: `"${message}"`, role: 'user', }, ]); const geminiRes = await genAI .getGenerativeModel({ model, generationConfig, safetySettings }) .generateContent(prompt); return geminiRes.response.candidates?.[0]?.content.parts[0]?.text; }
- Improve environment variable handling:
const API_KEY = process.env.GOOGLE_GENERATIVE_AI_API_KEY; if (!API_KEY) { throw new Error('GOOGLE_GENERATIVE_AI_API_KEY is not set'); }Apply these changes to simplify the main POST function and improve its structure.
Consider splitting this route handler into smaller, more focused middleware functions. This would improve testability and make the code easier to maintain as the application grows.
Line range hint
1-180: Summary of review findings and recommendationsThe changes in this file align with the PR objectives of migrating to async APIs. The main modification to await the
createClient()call is a positive step towards ensuring proper asynchronous operation.However, there are several areas where the code could be improved:
- Error handling: Implement more robust error handling, especially for asynchronous operations.
- Code structure: Refactor the POST function to improve modularity and readability.
- Environment variables: Enhance the robustness of environment variable usage.
- Consistency: Ensure that similar async changes are applied consistently across the codebase.
These improvements will enhance the maintainability and reliability of the code as the application continues to evolve.
As the application grows, consider adopting a more modular architecture. This could involve:
- Separating concerns into different modules (e.g., authentication, AI interaction, database operations).
- Implementing a middleware pattern for common operations like error handling and logging.
- Creating a centralized configuration module for managing environment variables and other settings.
These architectural improvements will make the codebase more scalable and easier to maintain in the long run.
apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/anthropic/new/route.ts (5)
Line range hint
36-38: Standardize error response formatFor consistency, consider using the same error response format as other parts of the function:
- if (!user) return NextResponse.json('Unauthorized', { status: 401 }); + if (!user) return NextResponse.json({ message: 'Unauthorized' }, { status: 401 });
Line range hint
15-15: Remove unused constantThe
API_KEYconstant is defined but never used in the function. Instead,apiKeyis used later.Consider removing this line:
-const API_KEY = process.env.GOOGLE_GENERATIVE_AI_API_KEY || '';
Line range hint
66-73: Remove duplicate condition checkThere's a duplicate check for the
titlevariable. The second check can be removed.Remove the duplicate condition:
- if (!title) { - return NextResponse.json( - { - message: 'Internal server error.', - }, - { status: 500 } - ); - }
Line range hint
144-163: Review safety settingsThe
safetySettingsare set toBLOCK_NONEfor all harm categories. This could potentially allow harmful content to be generated.Consider reviewing and adjusting these settings based on your application's requirements and ethical guidelines. If these settings are intentional, please add a comment explaining the rationale.
Line range hint
1-185: Summary of review findings
- The main change to make Supabase client creation asynchronous is appropriate and aligns with the PR objectives.
- Error handling could be improved and standardized throughout the function.
- There are some code cleanup opportunities, such as removing unused constants and duplicate checks.
- The
generationConfigandsafetySettingsneed clarification and potential adjustment.Overall, while the core change is good, there are several areas where the code could be improved for better reliability, consistency, and safety.
Consider implementing a more robust error handling strategy throughout the function, possibly using a custom error handler to ensure consistent error responses.
apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/openai/new/route.ts (3)
Line range hint
18-108: Improve error handling and response consistencyThere are several issues with the current error handling and response structure:
- Inconsistent error response format: Some errors return plain text, while others return JSON objects.
- Duplicated code block for handling falsy
title.- Incorrect status code (200) in the final catch block for errors.
To address these issues, please consider the following changes:
Standardize error responses:
function errorResponse(message: string, status: number) { return NextResponse.json({ error: message }, { status }); }Then use this function for all error responses, e.g.:
if (!message) return errorResponse('No message provided', 400);Remove the duplicated code block for handling falsy
title:-if (!title) { - return NextResponse.json( - { - message: 'Internal server error.', - }, - { status: 500 } - ); -}Correct the status code in the final catch block:
-return NextResponse.json( - `## Edge API Failure\nCould not complete the request. Please view the **Stack trace** below.\n\`\`\`bash\n${error?.stack}`, - { - status: 200, - } -); +return errorResponse(`Edge API Failure: ${error.message}`, 500);These changes will improve the consistency and correctness of error handling throughout the function.
Line range hint
1-180: Summary of review findings
- The main change to make the Supabase client creation asynchronous is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.
- There are opportunities to improve error handling and response consistency throughout the function.
- Security settings, API key handling, and content safety measures should be reviewed and potentially adjusted.
Overall, while the primary change is good, there are several areas where the code could be improved to enhance security, consistency, and maintainability.
Consider creating separate modules for error handling, API key management, and safety settings to improve the overall structure and reusability of the code.
Issues Identified with Error Logging
Multiple instances of
console.log(error)and similar patterns were found across the codebase. Logging errors directly can potentially expose sensitive information. It is recommended to implement proper error handling and avoid logging sensitive data.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-180: Review security settings and configurationThere are a few areas that could benefit from further review:
API Key Handling:
The current implementation falls back topreviewTokenif the environment variable is not set. This might pose a security risk if not properly managed.Generation Configuration:
There's a commented-outgenerationConfigobject.Decide whether to use this configuration or remove it entirely to keep the code clean.
Safety Settings:
All harm categories are set toBLOCK_NONE, which could potentially allow harmful content.Consider adjusting these settings to provide appropriate content filtering:
const safetySettings = [ { category: HarmCategory.HARM_CATEGORY_HARASSMENT, threshold: HarmBlockThreshold.BLOCK_MEDIUM_AND_ABOVE, }, { category: HarmCategory.HARM_CATEGORY_HATE_SPEECH, threshold: HarmBlockThreshold.BLOCK_MEDIUM_AND_ABOVE, }, { category: HarmCategory.HARM_CATEGORY_SEXUALLY_EXPLICIT, threshold: HarmBlockThreshold.BLOCK_MEDIUM_AND_ABOVE, }, { category: HarmCategory.HARM_CATEGORY_DANGEROUS_CONTENT, threshold: HarmBlockThreshold.BLOCK_MEDIUM_AND_ABOVE, }, ];Adjust the thresholds as needed based on your use case and content policies.
To ensure no sensitive information is exposed, run the following script:
If any matches are found, review them to ensure no sensitive information is being logged or returned in responses.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any hardcoded API keys or tokens rg --type typescript '(API_KEY|TOKEN|SECRET).*=.*["\'].*["\']'Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for potential sensitive information exposure rg --type typescript '(console\.log|NextResponse\.json).*error'Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected: Check for any hardcoded API keys or tokens rg --type typescript '(API_KEY|TOKEN|SECRET)\s*=\s*["'\''].*["'\''"]'Length of output: 106
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected: Check for potential sensitive information exposure rg --type ts '(console\.log|NextResponse\.json).*error'Length of output: 20441
apps/web/package.json (1)
65-65: Package update unrelated to PR objectivesWhile this update is beneficial for keeping dependencies up-to-date, it doesn't appear to be directly related to the main objective of the PR, which is to update Dynamic APIs to be async. Consider whether this change should be part of a separate maintenance PR to keep concerns separated.
apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/anthropic/summary/route.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-24: Overall impact of the change is minimal and focused.The change to make
createClient()asynchronous is isolated and doesn't affect the overall structure or logic of the file. This approach aligns with an incremental migration strategy to async APIs.As you continue migrating to async APIs, consider:
- Reviewing and updating error handling throughout the function to account for potential async operation failures.
- Assessing the performance impact of introducing async operations, especially in edge function contexts.
- Ensuring consistent async/await usage across all API routes for maintainability.
Also applies to: 31-205
apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/google/summary/route.ts (3)
Line range hint
6-8: Consider reviewing Edge runtime configuration and response streaming.Given the async nature of the function and the potential for long-running operations, consider the following suggestions:
Review the
maxDurationsetting to ensure it accommodates the async operations, especially if the Supabase client initialization or AI operations take significant time.Consider implementing response streaming for better user experience, particularly for the AI-generated content. This can be achieved using the
TransformStreamAPI in Edge runtime.Here's an example of how you could implement response streaming:
export async function PATCH(req: Request) { const stream = new TransformStream(); const writer = stream.writable.getWriter(); const encoder = new TextEncoder(); // Start the async operations processRequestAsync(req, writer, encoder).catch(console.error); // Return a streaming response return new Response(stream.readable, { headers: { 'Content-Type': 'text/plain; charset=utf-8' }, }); } async function processRequestAsync(req: Request, writer: WritableStreamDefaultWriter, encoder: TextEncoder) { // Your existing code here, using writer.write() to send partial responses // For example: writer.write(encoder.encode("Processing started...\n")); // ... (rest of your code) writer.write(encoder.encode(`Response: ${completion}\n`)); writer.close(); }This approach allows you to send partial responses as they become available, improving perceived performance for the client.
Line range hint
93-102: Enhance error handling and logging.While the current error handling is functional, consider the following improvements:
- Return appropriate HTTP status codes instead of always using 200 for errors.
- Avoid sending the full stack trace to the client, as it may expose sensitive information.
- Implement structured logging for better error tracking and analysis.
Here's a suggested improvement for the catch block:
} catch (error: any) { console.error('Error in PATCH /api/ai/chat/google/summary:', error); const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'An unknown error occurred'; const statusCode = error.statusCode || 500; return new Response(JSON.stringify({ error: errorMessage }), { status: statusCode, headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }, }); }Also, consider implementing a custom error class for more granular error handling:
class APIError extends Error { constructor(message: string, public statusCode: number) { super(message); this.name = 'APIError'; } } // Usage example: if (!id) throw new APIError('Missing chat ID', 400);This approach allows for more precise error handling and appropriate status codes.
Line range hint
134-190: Review and refine AI configuration for optimal performance.The AI configuration is comprehensive, but consider the following suggestions:
The
generationConfigis currently commented out. Decide whether to use it or remove it entirely to avoid confusion.The system instruction is detailed but could be more concise. Consider refactoring it for clarity and efficiency.
The safety settings are all set to
BLOCK_NONE. Ensure this aligns with your application's content policies.Here's a suggested refinement for the system instruction:
const systemInstruction = ` As an AI assistant, your task is to summarize the chat messages between the user and the AI. Follow these guidelines: - Provide a concise summary (3-5 sentences) of the entire conversation. - Generalize the content without including specific questions or replies. - Include all distinct topics discussed throughout the chat. - Ensure the summary is coherent and provides a quick overview of the conversation. - Use the same language as the user in your summary. - Do not use any formatting (Markdown, LaTeX, code blocks) in your response. - Do not ask questions or provide information about these guidelines. `;This refined version maintains the key points while being more concise and easier to parse for the AI.
Also, consider implementing a configuration object for easier management of AI settings:
const aiConfig = { model: 'gemini-1.5-flash', generationConfig: { temperature: 0.9, topK: 1, topP: 1, maxOutputTokens: 2048, }, safetySettings: [ // ... (your existing safety settings) ], }; // Usage const geminiRes = await genAI .getGenerativeModel(aiConfig) .generateContent(prompt);This approach allows for easier tweaking and management of AI parameters.
apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/openai/summary/route.ts (1)
Line range hint
95-101: Consider enhancing error logging for better debugging.While the current error handling is functional, consider adding more detailed logging to facilitate easier debugging in production environments. This could include logging specific error types, request details, or any other relevant context.
Here's a suggestion to enhance the error logging:
} catch (error: any) { - console.log(error); + console.error('Error in PATCH /api/ai/chat/openai/summary:', { + error: error.message, + stack: error.stack, + chatId: id, + }); return new Response( `## Edge API Failure\nCould not complete the request. Please view the **Stack trace** below.\n\`\`\`bash\n${error?.stack}`, { status: 200, } ); }apps/rewise/src/lib/workspace-helper.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-324: Summary: Consistent async updates, suggest thorough testingThe changes in this file consistently update all relevant functions to be async and await client creation. This aligns well with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. The consistency in these changes is commendable and will help with maintainability.
However, given the nature of these changes, they may have a cascading effect on other parts of the codebase that use these functions. To ensure the stability of the application, I recommend:
- Comprehensive unit testing for each modified function.
- Integration testing to verify the correct interaction between these functions and their consumers.
- End-to-end testing to catch any potential issues in the full request-response cycle.
Consider implementing a systematic approach to handle these async operations throughout the application, such as using a centralized error handling mechanism or implementing retry logic for failed requests.
apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/openai/route.ts (3)
13-13: Approve the addition ofawaitand suggest performance optimization.The addition of
awaittocreateAdminClient()is correct and aligns with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This ensures that the admin client is fully initialized before proceeding with the rest of the function execution.To optimize performance, consider moving the admin client creation outside of the route handler if possible. This would allow the client to be reused across multiple requests, reducing the overhead of creating a new client for each request. For example:
const sbAdmin = createAdminClient(); export async function POST(req: Request) { // Use `await sbAdmin` when needed within the function // ... }This approach would need to be carefully tested to ensure it doesn't introduce any issues with concurrent requests or client state management.
40-40: Approve the addition ofawaitand suggest performance optimization.The addition of
awaittocreateClient()is correct and consistent with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This ensures that the Supabase client is fully initialized before it's used in the function.Similar to the admin client, consider optimizing performance by moving the client creation outside of the route handler if possible:
const supabase = createClient(); export async function POST(req: Request) { // Use `await supabase` when needed within the function // ... }This approach would need to be carefully tested to ensure it doesn't introduce any issues with concurrent requests or client state management. Additionally, make sure that this doesn't conflict with any user-specific initialization that might be happening within
createClient().
Multiple instances of
createAdminClientandcreateClientrequire asynchronous handling.The verification revealed numerous locations where
createAdminClient()andcreateClient()are used synchronously. To maintain consistency and ensure proper asynchronous operation handling, please update all these instances to useawait.
- Update all occurrences of
createAdminClient()andcreateClient()to be asynchronous withawait.- Ensure consistent error handling across all async client creations.
- Refactor client creation into centralized async functions if possible to streamline the process.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
13-40: Overall impact assessment and further considerations.The changes to make client creation asynchronous improve the correctness of the code and align with the PR objective. However, there are some important considerations:
Performance: The added
awaitcalls may introduce a slight delay in request processing. Consider measuring the impact on response times and optimizing if necessary.Error Handling: Ensure that proper error handling is in place for these asynchronous operations. Consider wrapping the client creations in try-catch blocks or adding appropriate error responses.
Consistency: Verify that similar changes have been made throughout the application where these clients are created to maintain consistency.
Testing: Update and expand unit and integration tests to cover the asynchronous behavior, including potential failure scenarios.
Documentation: Update any relevant documentation to reflect the asynchronous nature of these operations.
Consider implementing a caching mechanism or connection pooling for the Supabase clients to minimize the performance impact of creating new clients for each request. This could involve creating a singleton instance of the clients that can be reused across requests, while still handling authentication and user-specific data correctly.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's check for other instances of
createAdminClientandcreateClientthat might need similar updates:This will help identify any other locations where these functions are called and might need to be updated to use
await.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other instances of createAdminClient and createClient echo "Instances of createAdminClient:" rg "createAdminClient\(\)" --type ts echo "\nInstances of createClient:" rg "createClient\(\)" --type tsLength of output: 42810
apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/anthropic/route.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-238: Overall impact of async changes and suggestions for improvementThe changes to make client creation calls asynchronous are consistent and align with the PR objectives. However, consider the following suggestions for further improvement:
- Update error handling throughout the file to account for potential Promise rejections from the newly asyncronous calls.
- Evaluate the performance impact of these changes, especially if this route is frequently accessed.
- Review the security implications of storing sensitive information (API keys, system instructions) directly in the file. Consider moving these to environment variables or a secure configuration management system.
- The
systemInstructionis quite long and complex. Consider moving it to a separate file for better maintainability.To help with the suggested improvements, you can use the following script to identify areas that might need attention:
#!/bin/bash # Search for potential areas needing error handling updates echo "Potential areas needing error handling updates:" rg --type typescript "await" -C 2 echo "\nPotential sensitive information:" rg --type typescript "process\.env\." -C 2 echo "\nLarge constant definitions:" rg --type typescript "const \w+ = `[\s\S]{100,}`" -C 2apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/google/route.ts (3)
13-13: Approve the async change and suggest optimization.The change to make
createAdminClient()asynchronous aligns with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This ensures that the admin client is fully initialized before use.Consider moving this initialization outside of the POST function if possible, to avoid reinitializing the admin client on every request. For example:
let sbAdmin: ReturnType<typeof createAdminClient>; export async function POST(req: Request) { if (!sbAdmin) { sbAdmin = await createAdminClient(); } // ... rest of the function }This approach would initialize the admin client only once and reuse it across multiple requests, potentially improving performance.
40-40: Approve the async change and suggest optimization.The change to make
createClient()asynchronous aligns with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This ensures that the Supabase client is fully initialized before use.Similar to the admin client, consider moving this initialization outside of the POST function to avoid reinitializing the Supabase client on every request. For example:
let supabase: ReturnType<typeof createClient>; export async function POST(req: Request) { if (!supabase) { supabase = await createClient(); } // ... rest of the function }This approach would initialize the Supabase client only once and reuse it across multiple requests, potentially improving performance.
Line range hint
1-290: Overall review: Suggestions for improvementThe changes align well with the PR objectives of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. However, there are a few areas where the code could be further improved:
Error Handling: The catch block at the end of the POST function could be more specific. Consider categorizing errors and providing more detailed error messages to aid in debugging.
System Instruction: The system instruction at the end of the file is quite long and complex. Consider moving this to a separate configuration file to improve maintainability.
Performance: As mentioned in previous comments, consider initializing clients outside the POST function to improve performance across multiple requests.
Type Safety: Consider using more specific types instead of
anyfor error handling to improve type safety.Here's a suggestion for improving error handling:
try { // ... existing code ... } catch (error) { console.error('Error in POST request:', error); if (error instanceof DatabaseError) { return new Response('Database error occurred', { status: 500 }); } else if (error instanceof AuthenticationError) { return new Response('Authentication failed', { status: 401 }); } else { return new Response('An unexpected error occurred', { status: 500 }); } }This approach provides more specific error messages and status codes based on the type of error encountered.
apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/c/[chatId]/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
39-46: Add error handling forcreateClient()initializationSince
createClient()is now asynchronous and is awaited, consider adding error handling to catch any potential issues during its initialization. This will enhance the robustness of your functionsgetMessagesandgetChat.You can modify the functions to include try-catch blocks:
const getMessages = async (chatId: string) => { - const supabase = await createClient(); + let supabase; + try { + supabase = await createClient(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error initializing Supabase client:', error); + return []; + } const { data, error } = await supabase .from('ai_chat_messages') .select('*') .eq('chat_id', chatId) .order('created_at'); // Rest of the code...And similarly for
getChat:const getChat = async (chatId: string) => { - const supabase = await createClient(); + let supabase; + try { + supabase = await createClient(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error initializing Supabase client:', error); + notFound(); + } const { data, error } = await supabase .from('ai_chats') .select('*') .eq('id', chatId) .single(); // Rest of the code...Also applies to: 59-66
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (34)
- apps/rewise/package.json (3 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/_components/language-wrapper.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/_components/system-language-wrapper.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/c/[chatId]/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/chats/[chatId]/layout.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/chats/[chatId]/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/helper.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/layout.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/quizzes/page.tsx (0 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/quizzes/quizzes.tsx (0 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/language-wrapper.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/navbar-actions.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/server-menu.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/anthropic/new/route.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/anthropic/route.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/anthropic/summary/route.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/google/new/route.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/google/route.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/google/summary/route.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/openai/new/route.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/openai/route.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/openai/summary/route.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/auth/callback/route.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/auth/email/route.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/auth/logout/route.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/auth/otp/send/route.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/auth/otp/verify/route.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/app/api/v1/infrastructure/languages/route.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/lib/user-helper.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/lib/workspace-helper.ts (6 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/utils/supabase/server.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/web/package.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (2)
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/quizzes/page.tsx
- apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/quizzes/quizzes.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (40)
apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/page.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-15: Summary: Successfully updated component for async API usageThe changes in this file effectively update the
AIPagecomponent to work with asynchronous APIs, aligning with the PR objectives. The modifications to both thePropsinterface and theAIPagefunction are well-implemented and maintain the component's functionality while introducing asynchronous behavior.Key points:
- The
Propsinterface now correctly definessearchParamsas a Promise.- The
AIPagefunction has been updated to properly await and handle the asynchronoussearchParams.These changes contribute to the overall goal of migrating the application to use asynchronous dynamic APIs, potentially improving performance and responsiveness.
5-7: Approved:Propsinterface updated to use asyncsearchParamsThe change from a synchronous object type to a Promise for
searchParamsaligns with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This modification enhances the application's ability to handle asynchronous operations more effectively.However, be aware that this change may have broader implications:
- All usages of
searchParamsthroughout the codebase will need to be updated to handle the Promise.- The introduction of asynchronous operations may slightly impact the application's performance and behavior, particularly in terms of when data becomes available.
To ensure all usages of
searchParamshave been updated, run the following script:apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/_components/system-language-wrapper.tsx (1)
5-6: Async cookie retrieval aligns with PR objectivesThe change to use
await c()for cookie retrieval aligns well with the PR objective of updating dynamic APIs to be async. This modification should contribute to improved performance and responsiveness of the application.apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/language-wrapper.tsx (3)
6-6: Function signature updated to asyncThe
LanguageWrapperfunction has been correctly updated to be asynchronous. This change aligns with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async.
7-7: Cookie retrieval method is now asynchronousThe cookie retrieval method has been updated to use
await c()instead ofc(). This change is consistent with the new async nature of the function and ensures that the cookies are retrieved asynchronously.
Line range hint
6-13: Verify the impact of async changesThe change to make
LanguageWrapperasync is part of a larger effort to update Dynamic APIs. While the change looks good, it's important to verify that all calling code has been updated to handle this function as an async operation.To ensure that all usages of
LanguageWrapperhave been updated, run the following script:This script will help identify any locations where
LanguageWrapperis used and verify that it's being called correctly in an async context.apps/rewise/src/app/api/auth/email/route.ts (2)
5-5: Excellent update to async client creationThe change to await the
createClient()call is a positive improvement. It ensures that the Supabase client is fully initialized before it's used in subsequent operations, which aligns with the PR's objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This change enhances the reliability of the function and reduces the risk of potential race conditions or uninitialized client usage.
Line range hint
1-24: Overall, the changes and structure look goodThe modification to use an async
createClient()is a positive change that aligns with the PR objectives. The overall structure of the PATCH function is clean and logical, with appropriate error handling in place. With the suggested improvements for email validation and more specific error messages, this file will be in excellent shape.apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/navbar-actions.tsx (1)
11-11: Approve the async client creation, but consider error handlingThe change to await
createClient()is appropriate and aligns with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This ensures that the Supabase client is fully initialized before use, which is a good practice.However, consider the following points:
- Error Handling: Add a try-catch block to handle potential errors from
createClient().- Performance: Be aware that this change might slightly increase the time to render the NavbarActions component.
Consider refactoring the code to include error handling:
- const supabase = await createClient(); + let supabase; + try { + supabase = await createClient(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to create Supabase client:', error); + // Consider how to handle this error in the UI + // For example, you might want to return an error state or fallback UI + }To ensure this change doesn't introduce issues elsewhere, let's check for other usages of
createClient:✅ Verification successful
Approve the async client creation, ensuring it's within an async context
The update to
await createClient()innavbar-actions.tsxis appropriate and ensures that the Supabase client is fully initialized before use within an asynchronous function.Upon reviewing the codebase, other instances of
createClient()are used both with and withoutawaitbased on their contextual requirements. This indicates that the change is correctly scoped and does not introduce issues elsewhere.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of createClient that might need similar updates rg "createClient\(\)" --type typescriptLength of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of createClient that might need similar updates rg "createClient\(\)" --type tsxLength of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of createClient that might need similar updates rg "createClient\(\)" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 36664
apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/_components/language-wrapper.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-29: Summary: Successful implementation of async cookie retrieval.The changes in this file successfully implement async cookie retrieval, aligning with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. The modification is minimal yet impactful, potentially improving the application's responsiveness. The rest of the function's logic remains intact, minimizing the risk of unintended side effects.
Key points:
- The function signature is correctly updated to be async.
- Async cookie retrieval is implemented correctly.
- The rest of the function uses the retrieved cookies object appropriately.
These changes contribute positively to the overall goal of migrating to asynchronous dynamic APIs. Ensure to apply similar changes consistently across the codebase where applicable.
apps/rewise/src/lib/user-helper.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-40: Verify the impact on application performance.The changes to make
createClient()asynchronous in bothgetCurrentSupabaseUserandgetCurrentUserfunctions are consistent with the PR objectives. However, it's important to verify the impact of these changes on the overall application performance.Run the following script to identify all files that import and use these functions:
Review the output to identify any potential performance bottlenecks, especially in frequently accessed components or API routes. Consider implementing caching or memoization strategies for these functions if they are called multiple times in short succession.
apps/rewise/src/utils/supabase/server.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM: Import statement for ReadonlyRequestCookies added.The addition of this import aligns with the changes in the
createCookieHandlerfunction, indicating a shift towards using Next.js's built-in cookie handling mechanisms.
20-22: LGTM: Updated createGenericClient to be async.The function is now asynchronous, aligning with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. The
cookies()call is correctly awaited.To ensure that all calls to
createGenericClienthave been updated to handle the new async nature, please run the following script:Please review the results to ensure all calls are properly awaited or handled in an async context.
✅ Verification successful
: All usages of
createGenericClientare correctly awaited.The changes to
createGenericClienthave been properly implemented and all calls are now handled asynchronously. No issues were found during the verification process.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to createGenericClient and verify they are awaited or handled properly # Search for createGenericClient calls echo "Searching for createGenericClient calls:" rg --type typescript -A 3 "createGenericClient\(" apps/ # Search for createAdminClient and createClient calls (which use createGenericClient) echo "Searching for createAdminClient and createClient calls:" rg --type typescript -A 3 "create(Admin|)Client\(" apps/Length of output: 398
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to createGenericClient and verify they are awaited or handled properly # Search for createGenericClient calls without specifying file type echo "Searching for createGenericClient calls:" rg "createGenericClient\(" apps/ -A 3 # Search for createAdminClient and createClient calls without specifying file type echo "Searching for createAdminClient and createClient calls:" rg "create(Admin|)Client\(" apps/ -A 3Length of output: 154000
apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/chats/[chatId]/layout.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-101: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The modifications to this file successfully implement the transition to async operations for dynamic APIs. The changes maintain existing functionality while improving type safety and preparing for better error handling. The updates are consistent with Next.js's move towards async Server Components.
To ensure a smooth transition, make sure to:
- Update any code that relies on the
Propsinterface to handle the new Promise-basedparams.- Verify that
createAdminClientis used asynchronously throughout the codebase.- Consider implementing the suggested error handling for the
paramsPromise ingenerateMetadata.Great job on implementing these changes!
16-16: LGTM! VerifycreateAdminClientusage.Awaiting
createAdminClientis consistent with the move to async operations and ensures proper initialization of the Supabase client.Let's check if this change has been consistently applied throughout the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining synchronous usage of createAdminClient # Test: Search for createAdminClient usage without await rg --type typescript "createAdminClient\(\)" -g '!layout.tsx'apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/layout.tsx (2)
14-14: Approval: Asynchronous params handling in LayoutPropsThis change aligns well with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. By making
paramsa Promise, we're ensuring that the layout can handle asynchronous parameter resolution, which is crucial for dynamic routing and internationalization in Next.js applications.
Line range hint
1-72: Summary: Successful implementation of asynchronous Dynamic APIsThe changes in this file successfully implement the shift towards asynchronous Dynamic APIs, aligning well with the PR objectives. The modifications to LayoutProps, the Layout function, and cookie handling consistently support this transition.
Key points:
- Asynchronous params handling in LayoutProps and Layout function.
- Asynchronous cookie retrieval.
While the core changes are solid, consider the suggested improvements for naming conventions and error handling to enhance code readability and robustness.
apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/layout.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-150: Summary: Successful implementation of async Dynamic APIsThe changes in this file successfully implement the async Dynamic APIs as per the PR objectives. The modifications are minimal, focused, and consistent across the file. The breaking changes are limited to the expected areas (Props interface and function signatures).
Key points:
- The
Propsinterface now uses a Promise forparams.- Both
generateMetadataandRootLayoutfunctions are updated to handle asyncparams.- The rest of the file remains unchanged, maintaining existing functionality.
To ensure that these changes don't have unintended consequences, consider running the following verification:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining synchronous usages of params or locale in the app rg --type typescript "params: *{ *locale: string *}" apps/rewise/src rg --type typescript "params: *{ *locale *}" apps/rewise/srcThis will help identify any places where the old synchronous structure might still be in use.
18-20: Approved: Props interface updated to support async paramsThe change to make
paramsaPromisealigns with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This is consistent with the related Next.js PR (vercel/next.js#68812).Note that this is a breaking change. To ensure all usages are updated, run the following script:
apps/rewise/package.json (4)
92-92: LGTM. Version sync with Next.js.The update of
@next/bundle-analyzerfrom15.0.0-canary.170to15.0.0-canary.171is correct and necessary to maintain synchronization with the Next.js version update.
93-93: LGTM. Version sync with Next.js.The update of
@next/eslint-plugin-nextfrom15.0.0-canary.170to15.0.0-canary.171is correct and necessary to maintain synchronization with the Next.js version update. This ensures that the linting rules remain compatible with the Next.js version being used.
65-65: Approved, but exercise caution with canary versions.The update of
nextfrom15.0.0-canary.170to15.0.0-canary.171aligns with the PR objectives. However, please note that canary versions are pre-release and may contain unstable features or breaking changes.To verify the changes in this canary release, you can run:
#!/bin/bash # Fetch the changelog or commit history for Next.js between the two versions gh api repos/vercel/next.js/compare/v15.0.0-canary.170...v15.0.0-canary.171 --jq '.commits[].commit.message' || echo "Changelog not found. Please check manually at https://github.com/vercel/next.js/compare/v15.0.0-canary.170...v15.0.0-canary.171"Monitor closely for any issues that may arise from this update during testing and initial deployment.
48-48: LGTM. Consider reviewing the changelog.The update of
@tabler/icons-reactfrom^3.18.0to^3.19.0is a minor version bump, which should be safe. However, it's always a good practice to review the changelog for any new features or potential issues that might affect your project.To verify the changelog, you can run:
apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/anthropic/new/route.ts (1)
Line range hint
131-131: Clarify intention of undefined generationConfigThe
generationConfigis set toundefined, but there's a commented-out configuration below. Is this intentional or should the commented configuration be used?Please clarify if the
undefinedgenerationConfigis intentional or if the commented configuration should be used.Also applies to: 137-142
apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/openai/new/route.ts (1)
31-31: LGTM: Asynchronous Supabase client creationThe change to create the Supabase client asynchronously is correct and aligns with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues, please verify that all subsequent uses of the
supabaseclient within this function are properly awaited. Run the following script to check for any non-awaited calls:If the script returns any matches, ensure those calls are properly awaited.
apps/web/package.json (1)
65-65: Version update for @tabler/icons-react packageThe version of
@tabler/icons-reacthas been updated from^3.18.0to^3.19.0. This is a minor version update, which typically includes new features and backwards-compatible changes.To ensure this update doesn't introduce any breaking changes or conflicts, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any potential issues or necessary adjustments related to the package update.
apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/anthropic/summary/route.ts (1)
30-30: Approve the async client creation and suggest error handling.The change to await the
createClient()function aligns with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This ensures that the Supabase client is fully initialized before proceeding with subsequent operations.Consider adding error handling for this async operation:
- const supabase = await createClient(); + let supabase; + try { + supabase = await createClient(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to create Supabase client:', error); + return new Response('Internal Server Error', { status: 500 }); + }Let's verify the impact of this change on the rest of the function:
✅ Verification successful
Approve the async client creation and suggest error handling.
The change to
awaitthecreateClient()function aligns with the PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. This ensures that the Supabase client is fully initialized before proceeding with subsequent operations.Consider adding error handling for this async operation:
- const supabase = await createClient(); + let supabase; + try { + supabase = await createClient(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to create Supabase client:', error); + return new Response('Internal Server Error', { status: 500 }); + }🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any other occurrences of createClient() in the file # and verify if they are also properly awaited. rg --type typescript 'createClient\(\)' apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/anthropic/summary/route.tsLength of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any other occurrences of createClient() in the file # and verify if they are also properly awaited. rg 'createClient\(\)' apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/anthropic/summary/route.tsLength of output: 125
apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/google/summary/route.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-190: Overall assessment: Good progress, with room for refinement.The core change of awaiting the Supabase client creation is correct and aligns with the PR objectives. The file implements a complex functionality involving authentication, database operations, and AI interaction, which is generally well-structured.
Key recommendations:
- Implement response streaming for improved user experience.
- Enhance error handling with appropriate status codes and structured logging.
- Refine the AI configuration for optimal performance and maintainability.
- Review the Edge runtime configuration to ensure it accommodates the async nature of the function.
These improvements will enhance the robustness, performance, and maintainability of the code. Great work on the async migration, and keep up the good progress!
apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/openai/summary/route.ts (1)
Line range hint
148-154: Verify the intention behind the undefinedgenerationConfig.The
generationConfigis currently set toundefined, with a commented-out configuration below it. This might be intentional, but it's worth verifying to ensure it aligns with the expected behavior of the Google Generative AI model.Could you confirm if leaving
generationConfigasundefinedis intentional? If not, consider uncommenting and adjusting the configuration as needed:- const generationConfig = undefined; + const generationConfig = { + temperature: 0.9, + topK: 1, + topP: 1, + maxOutputTokens: 2048, + };apps/rewise/src/lib/workspace-helper.ts (6)
65-65: LGTM! Verify usage ofgetWorkspaceInvites.The change to make
createClient()awaited is correct and aligns with the PR objective. The function signature has been appropriately updated toasync.Let's verify the usage of
getWorkspaceInvitesin the codebase:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all calls to `getWorkspaceInvites` are properly awaited. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: All occurrences should be awaited. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'getWorkspaceInvites\('
150-153: LGTM! Verify usage ofgetSecrets.The changes to make
createAdminClient()andcreateClient()awaited are correct and align with the PR objective. The function signature has been appropriately updated toasync. The conditional logic for choosing between admin and regular client is maintained, which is good for consistency.Let's verify the usage of
getSecretsin the codebase:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all calls to `getSecrets` are properly awaited. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: All occurrences should be awaited. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'getSecrets\('
214-214: LGTM! Verify usage ofgetPermissions.The change to make
createClient()awaited is correct and aligns with the PR objective. The function signature has been appropriately updated toasync.Let's verify the usage of
getPermissionsin the codebase:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all calls to `getPermissions` are properly awaited. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: All occurrences should be awaited. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'getPermissions\('
41-41: LGTM! Verify usage ofgetWorkspaces.The change to make
createClient()awaited is correct and aligns with the PR objective. The function signature has been appropriately updated toasync.Let's verify the usage of
getWorkspacesin the codebase:
12-12: LGTM! Verify usage ofgetWorkspace.The change to make
createClient()awaited is correct and aligns with the PR objective. The function signature has been appropriately updated toasync.Let's verify the usage of
getWorkspacein the codebase:✅ Verification successful
Verified: All
getWorkspacecalls are properly awaited.The
getWorkspacefunction is correctly defined asasyncinapps/rewise/src/lib/workspace-helper.tsand all its usages across the codebase appropriately use theawaitkeyword.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all calls to `getWorkspace` are properly awaited. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: All occurrences should be awaited. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'getWorkspace\('Length of output: 195
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all calls to `getWorkspace` are properly awaited. # Test: Search for the function usage in TypeScript files. Expect: All occurrences should be awaited. rg --type ts 'getWorkspace\(' rg --type tsx 'getWorkspace\('Length of output: 1369
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all calls to `getWorkspace` are properly awaited. # Test: Search for the function usage in TypeScript files (*.ts and *.tsx). Expect: All occurrences should be awaited. rg 'getWorkspace\(' --glob '*.ts' rg 'getWorkspace\(' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 1349
119-119: ```shell
#!/bin/bashDescription: Verify there are no calls to
enforceRootWorkspaceAdminthat are not awaited.Search for the function usage in .ts and .tsx files that are not preceded by 'await'.
rg --glob '*.{ts,tsx}' --perl-regex '(?<!await\s+)enforceRootWorkspaceAdmin('
</blockquote></details> <details> <summary>apps/rewise/src/app/api/ai/chat/anthropic/route.ts (2)</summary><blockquote> `40-40`: **Correct implementation of async call.** The addition of `await` for `createClient()` is appropriate and consistent with the previous change. This ensures that the Supabase client is fully initialized before use. Consider the following: 1. Ensure that `createClient()` is properly defined to return a Promise. 2. Update error handling to catch potential Promise rejections. 3. Evaluate the performance impact of this change, especially if this function is called frequently. To verify the `createClient` implementation, run: --- `13-13`: **Correct implementation of async call.** The addition of `await` for `createAdminClient()` is appropriate and aligns with the PR objective to update Dynamic APIs to be async. This ensures that the admin client is fully initialized before proceeding. Consider the following: 1. Ensure that `createAdminClient()` is properly defined to return a Promise. 2. Update error handling to catch potential Promise rejections. 3. Evaluate the performance impact of this change, especially if this function is called frequently. To verify the `createAdminClient` implementation, run: </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/c/[chatId]/page.tsx (2)</summary><blockquote> `39-39`: **Verify the necessity of making `createClient()` asynchronous** The `createClient()` function is now being awaited, indicating it has become asynchronous. Ensure that this change is intentional and that all other usages of `createClient()` in the codebase are updated accordingly. Additionally, verify that any asynchronous initialization within `createClient()` requires awaiting and that appropriate error handling is in place. Also applies to: 59-59 --- Line range hint `17-28`: **Ensure consistent localization handling** The `locale` is being extracted from `searchParams`. Confirm that `searchParams` always contains the `lang` parameter. If not, consider providing a default locale or handling the absence of this parameter to prevent potential runtime errors. You can add a fallback for the `locale`: ```diff - const { lang: locale } = searchParams; + const { lang } = searchParams; + const locale = lang || 'en'; // Default to 'en' if 'lang' is undefinedapps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/chats/[chatId]/page.tsx (1)
8-13: Confirm the necessity of makingparamsandsearchParamspromises in thePropsinterfaceTypically, in Next.js,
paramsandsearchParamsare synchronous objects. Changing them toPromise<{...}>might not be required unless the framework update mandates it. Please verify if this change is necessary due to the migration to asynchronous dynamic APIs and ensure consistency across the codebase.
apps/rewise/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/_components/system-language-wrapper.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
vhpx
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (44)
.editorconfig (1)
4-10: LGTM! Consider adding max_line_length.The global settings are well-defined and follow common best practices. They will help maintain consistency across the project. Here's a breakdown of the benefits:
- UTF-8 charset ensures universal compatibility.
- LF line endings are ideal for cross-platform development.
- 2-space indentation is consistent with many JavaScript/TypeScript style guides.
- Inserting a final newline and trimming trailing whitespace are good practices.
Consider adding a
max_line_lengthsetting to enforce a consistent line length across the project. For example:[*] charset = utf-8 end_of_line = lf indent_size = 2 indent_style = space insert_final_newline = true trim_trailing_whitespace = true +max_line_length = 100This addition would help maintain readability and prevent excessively long lines.
packages/ui/components.json (1)
14-18: Summary of alias changes and their impact.The changes to the aliases in this file indicate a significant restructuring of the project's import paths. The introduction of the "@repo" namespace and new aliases for "ui", "lib", and "hooks" suggests a move towards a more organized and modular structure.
These changes will likely require updates to import statements across the entire project. To ensure a smooth transition:
- Verify that all old import paths have been updated to use the new aliases.
- Check that the new aliases are being used consistently where appropriate.
- Update any documentation or contribution guidelines to reflect these new import conventions.
- Consider running automated tests and doing a thorough manual review of the application to catch any missed updates that might cause runtime errors.
To facilitate this transition and prevent future issues, consider implementing the following:
- Use path aliases in your TypeScript configuration to make these imports consistent and easier to manage.
- Implement linting rules to enforce the use of these new aliases in import statements.
- Create a migration guide for team members to understand and adopt these new import conventions.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/fleeting-navigator-menu.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-39: Overall impact and relation to PR objectivesThe changes in this file are limited to migrating from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-reactfor icon usage. While these modifications enhance consistency with the project-wide icon library migration, they don't appear to be directly related to the main PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async.Consider clarifying in the PR description why these icon library changes are included in this PR, or if they should be part of a separate, focused refactoring effort.
apps/web/src/components/common/PlusCardButton.tsx (1)
25-25: LGTM! Consider refactoring to reduce duplication.The
Plusicon fromlucide-reactis correctly used in the button element, maintaining consistency with the earlier changes. The existing styling and behavior are preserved.Consider refactoring the component to reduce code duplication between the Link and button implementations. You could extract the common JSX for the icon into a separate variable or component. For example:
const PlusIcon = ( <Plus className="h-6 w-6 text-zinc-700 transition group-hover:text-zinc-900 dark:text-zinc-400 dark:group-hover:text-zinc-300" /> ); // Then use it in both places: // <Link ...>{PlusIcon}</Link> // <button ...>{PlusIcon}</button>This would make future changes to the icon easier to manage and reduce the risk of inconsistencies.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/features.tsx (1)
23-49: LGTM: Icon usage updated correctly with a suggestion for consistency.The icon components have been successfully updated to use the new imports from 'lucide-react'. The changes are consistent with the PR objectives and maintain the existing functionality.
Consider extracting the icon size className into a constant for better maintainability:
const ICON_CLASS_NAME = 'h-6 w-6'; // Then use it like this: icon: <Sparkles className={ICON_CLASS_NAME} />,This would make it easier to update the icon size across all features if needed in the future.
apps/web/src/components/document/DocumentCard.tsx (1)
49-49: LGTM: Icon replacement implemented correctly.The
FilePlusicon fromlucide-reactis correctly used to replace the previousDocumentPlusIcon. The styling is maintained, ensuring visual consistency.For better code consistency across the project, consider using the
Iconsuffix for Lucide icons, like this:-<FilePlus className="w-5 flex-none" /> +<FilePlusIcon className="w-5 flex-none" />This naming convention is commonly used with Lucide icons in React projects and might improve readability.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/reports/row-actions.tsx (2)
12-12: Approve import changes and suggest cleanupThe change from
DotsHorizontalIcontoEllipsisis consistent with the PR objectives of updating icon libraries. However, theEyeicon is imported but not used in the visible changes.Consider removing unused imports to keep the code clean. If
Eyeis used elsewhere in the file, please disregard this suggestion.
Line range hint
1-78: Suggest cleanup of commented-out codeThe changes in this file are consistent and align with the PR objectives. However, there are several blocks of commented-out code throughout the file, particularly in the
deleteUserReportfunction and around theshowEditDialogstate.Consider removing or refactoring the commented-out code to improve code cleanliness and maintainability. If this code is intended for future use, consider adding a TODO comment explaining its purpose and when it might be uncommented.
apps/web/src/components/inputs/CheckupVitalInput.tsx (1)
Line range hint
24-24: Consider updating TrashIcon for consistencyWhile the
XMarkIconhas been updated to use thelucide-reactlibrary, theTrashIconis still being used from the old library. For consistency and to complete the migration, consider updating theTrashIconusage as well.Here's a suggested change:
-<TrashIcon className="h-5 w-5" /> +<Trash className="h-5 w-5" />Make sure to update both occurrences (lines 24 and 61) and adjust the import statement accordingly.
Also applies to: 61-61
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/settings/reports/row-actions.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-73: Overall assessment: Changes implemented correctly and consistently.The modifications in this file are focused on switching from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-reactfor the ellipsis icon. The changes are minimal, consistent, and don't alter the component's functionality. This update aligns well with the PR objectives.However, to ensure a smooth transition:
- Verify that this icon change has been consistently applied across the entire codebase.
- Confirm that the new icon visually integrates well with the existing design.
- Consider updating the project documentation to reflect the switch in icon libraries, if applicable.
To facilitate future updates and maintain consistency, consider centralizing icon imports in a separate file (e.g.,
icons.ts). This approach would make it easier to manage and update icon usage across the application.apps/web/src/components/row-actions/secrets.tsx (2)
15-15: LGTM! Consider adjusting icon size for consistency.The icon replacement from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactis consistent with the project's update goals. The functionality remains unchanged.For better consistency with other Lucide icons, consider adjusting the icon size:
-<Ellipsis className="h-4 w-4" /> +<Ellipsis className="h-5 w-5" />This change aligns with Lucide's default icon size and may improve visual consistency across the application.
Also applies to: 61-61
Line range hint
30-41: Consider consistent error handling for API calls.The error handling for the delete operation is good, but it could be improved for consistency across the application.
Consider extracting the error handling logic into a reusable function:
const handleApiError = async (res: Response, errorMessage: string) => { if (!res.ok) { const data = await res.json(); toast({ title: errorMessage, description: data.message, }); return false; } return true; }; // Usage in deleteSecret: const deleteSecret = async () => { const res = await fetch(`/api/workspaces/${secret.ws_id}/secrets/${secret.id}`, { method: 'DELETE', }); if (await handleApiError(res, 'Failed to delete workspace secret')) { router.refresh(); } };This approach would make error handling more consistent and easier to maintain across different API calls in the application.
apps/web/src/components/inputs/ProductPriceInput.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-84: Consider cleaning up commented-out code.While the icon library update is implemented correctly, there are sections of commented-out code in the component (e.g., the
minAmountinput). If these features are no longer needed or have been replaced, consider removing the commented code to improve readability and maintainability.If the commented code represents features that are still in development or might be reintroduced later, consider adding a TODO comment explaining the reason for keeping it.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/inventory/units/row-actions.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-87: Summary: Icon library update successfully implemented.The changes in this file are part of the larger effort to migrate from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-react. The modifications are minimal and focused, affecting only the import statement and the icon usage within theProductUnitRowActionscomponent.Recommendations:
- Ensure that this icon library update is consistently applied across the entire application.
- Verify that the new
Ellipsisicon renders correctly and maintains the intended design aesthetics.- Consider updating the component's documentation or comments to reflect the new icon usage, if applicable.
As you continue this migration:
- Maintain a list of all components that require icon updates to ensure complete coverage.
- Consider creating a central icon import file to manage all icon imports in one place, making future library switches easier.
- After completing the migration, update your project's documentation to reflect the new icon library usage and any associated best practices.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/group-tags/row-actions.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-89: Summary: Icon library change with minimal impact on component functionality.The changes in this file are part of a larger effort to standardize icon usage across the application. The switch from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactfor the ellipsis icon is the only modification in this component.Key points:
- The component's functionality remains unchanged.
- The visual appearance should be largely consistent, with only a potential slight difference in the icon design.
- This change aligns with the project's goal of using a consistent icon library.
Consider documenting this icon library change in the project's style guide or component library documentation to ensure all developers are aware of the preferred icon library for future development.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/groups/filters.tsx (1)
33-33: LGTM: Icon component updatesThe changes from
PlusCircledIcontoPlusCircleandMinusCircledIcontoMinusCircleare consistent with the import statement modifications. The semantic meaning and styling of the icons are preserved.For better consistency and maintainability, consider extracting the common className "mr-2 h-4 w-4" into a constant or a utility class. This would make future updates easier and reduce repetition. For example:
const iconClassName = "mr-2 h-4 w-4"; // Then use it like this: <PlusCircle className={iconClassName} /> <MinusCircle className={iconClassName} />Also applies to: 45-45
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/inventory/categories/row-actions.tsx (1)
Line range hint
29-43: Consider enhancing error handling in the delete function.The
deleteDatafunction currently has basic error handling, but it could be improved to provide more specific error messages and handle network errors.Consider refactoring the
deleteDatafunction to include more robust error handling:const deleteData = async () => { try { const res = await fetch( `/api/v1/workspaces/${data.ws_id}/product-categories/${data.id}`, { method: 'DELETE', } ); if (res.ok) { router.refresh(); toast({ title: 'Category deleted successfully', description: 'The product category has been removed.', }); } else { const errorData = await res.json(); throw new Error(errorData.message || 'Failed to delete workspace category'); } } catch (error) { console.error('Error deleting category:', error); toast({ title: 'Failed to delete workspace category', description: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'An unexpected error occurred', variant: 'destructive', }); } };This refactored version:
- Adds a success toast message.
- Uses a try-catch block to handle potential network errors.
- Provides more specific error messages in the toast.
- Logs errors to the console for debugging purposes.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/roles/row-actions.tsx (1)
16-16: LGTM! Consider optimizing imports.The change from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactis consistent with the project's icon library migration. This change maintains functionality while updating the visual representation.Consider removing the unused
Pencilimport to keep the imports clean:-import { Ellipsis, Pencil } from 'lucide-react'; +import { Ellipsis } from 'lucide-react';apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/finance/invoices/row-actions.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-101: Overall impact is minimal, consider enabling edit and delete functions.The changes to this component are limited to updating the icon library, which should not affect its functionality. The component still provides options for viewing, editing, and deleting invoices. However, I noticed that the edit and delete functionalities are disabled.
Consider implementing the edit functionality and enabling both edit and delete options if they are intended to be used. This would improve the user experience and make the component fully functional. If these features are not ready for production, you might want to add a TODO comment explaining why they are disabled and when they will be implemented.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/groups/row-actions.tsx (2)
72-72: LGTM: Icon component updated correctly.The
Ellipsisicon component is correctly used to replace the previousDotsHorizontalIcon. This change maintains the functionality while aligning with the new icon library.Consider updating the
sr-onlytext on line 73 to be more descriptive, e.g., "Open actions menu" instead of "Open menu". This would improve accessibility by providing more context to screen reader users.
Line range hint
1-100: Consider extracting the delete functionality into a separate hook.The component is well-structured and follows good practices. To further improve code organization and reusability, consider extracting the
deleteUserGroupfunction into a custom hook, e.g.,useDeleteUserGroup. This would separate concerns and make the component more focused on rendering.Here's a sketch of how this could look:
// useDeleteUserGroup.ts import { useRouter } from 'next/navigation'; import { toast } from '@repo/ui/hooks/use-toast'; export function useDeleteUserGroup() { const router = useRouter(); return async (wsId: string, groupId: string) => { const res = await fetch(`/api/v1/workspaces/${wsId}/user-groups/${groupId}`, { method: 'DELETE', }); if (res.ok) { router.refresh(); } else { const data = await res.json(); toast({ title: 'Failed to delete workspace user group tag', description: data.message, }); } }; } // In your component const deleteUserGroup = useDeleteUserGroup(); // ... <DropdownMenuItem onClick={() => deleteUserGroup(data.ws_id, data.id)}> {t('common.delete')} </DropdownMenuItem>This refactoring would make the component more focused on its rendering responsibilities and improve the reusability of the delete functionality.
apps/web/src/hooks/useDocuments.tsx (2)
72-76: Consistent pattern of removing error notificationsThe error notification for failed document deletions has been commented out, consistent with the changes in both the createDocument and updateDocument functions.
This consistent pattern across all document operations (create, update, delete) strongly suggests a deliberate change in the error handling strategy. Consider the following recommendations:
- Document the rationale behind this change in the PR description or code comments.
- Implement an alternative error handling mechanism to ensure users are informed of operation failures.
- Update any related documentation or user guides to reflect this change in behavior.
- Consider adding logging for these errors to aid in debugging and monitoring.
To verify the extent of this change and identify any remaining error notifications, you can run:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify remaining error notifications and commented out error handling # Test 1: Search for remaining active showNotification calls echo "Active notifications:" rg --type typescript 'showNotification\(' # Test 2: Search for other commented out error handling echo "Commented out error handling:" rg --type typescript '^\s*//.*error|failed|catch'This will help ensure consistency across the codebase and identify any areas that might need attention.
Line range hint
1-105: Summary: Comprehensive review of error handling strategy requiredThe changes in this file consistently remove error notifications across all document operations (create, update, delete). While this appears to be a deliberate change, it raises concerns about user experience and error visibility.
To ensure these changes align with the project's goals and maintain a good user experience, consider the following steps:
- Review and document the overall error handling strategy for the application.
- Implement an alternative mechanism for informing users about operation failures.
- Update unit tests to reflect the new error handling behavior.
- Consider adding logging for these errors to aid in debugging and monitoring.
- Update any relevant documentation or user guides to reflect these changes.
To facilitate this review, you might want to create a new issue or task to track the implementation of a new error handling mechanism. This will ensure that the removal of notifications doesn't leave a gap in user feedback.
apps/web/src/components/row-actions/timezones/index.tsx (1)
86-86: LGTM: Icon usage updated correctly. Consider enhancing accessibility.The
Ellipsisicon fromlucide-reactis now correctly used in place of the previousDotsHorizontalIcon. The styling remains consistent, which is good for maintaining the UI's appearance.As a minor suggestion to enhance accessibility:
Consider adding an
aria-labelto the button to provide more context for screen readers. For example:<Button variant="ghost" className="data-[state=open]:bg-muted flex h-8 w-8 p-0" + aria-label="Open actions menu" > <Ellipsis className="h-4 w-4" /> <span className="sr-only">Open menu</span> </Button>This addition would provide more descriptive information about the button's purpose for users relying on assistive technologies.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/documents/page.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-124: Consider code cleanup: Remove or document commented codeWhile reviewing the file, I noticed several blocks of commented-out code, particularly around lines 28-58 and 76-82. These sections appear to be unrelated to the current changes and may represent potential future features or removed functionality.
To improve code readability and maintainability, consider the following options:
- If the commented code is no longer needed, remove it entirely.
- If the code represents future functionality, add a TODO comment explaining its purpose and when it might be implemented.
- If the code is kept for reference, add a clear comment explaining why it's being preserved and for how long.
Cleaning up unused code helps maintain a cleaner codebase and reduces confusion for other developers working on the file.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/drive/row-actions.tsx (2)
15-15: LGTM! Consider updating the icon name for clarity.The change from
DotsHorizontalIcontoEllipsisis consistent with the migration from@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-react. This update aligns with the project-wide effort to standardize icon usage.For improved clarity, consider updating the variable name on line 115 to match the new icon name:
- <Ellipsis className="h-4 w-4" /> + <Ellipsis className="h-4 w-4" aria-hidden="true" />Adding
aria-hidden="true"ensures that screen readers ignore this decorative icon, improving accessibility.Also applies to: 115-115
Line range hint
1-134: Overall, the changes look good and align with the project's objectives.The update to the icon library is consistent with the project-wide effort to standardize icon usage. The component's functionality remains unchanged, and the modification is limited to visual representation only.
Consider reviewing other components in the application to ensure consistent usage of the new icon library. This will help maintain a uniform look and feel across the entire platform.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/healthcare/vital-groups/new.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-168: Summary: Icon library change implemented correctlyThe changes in this file are limited to updating the trash icon from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-react. These modifications are implemented correctly and don't affect the component's functionality. The change is part of a larger effort to standardize icon usage across the project.To ensure a smooth transition:
- Verify that all
@heroicons/reactimports have been replaced project-wide.- Update any documentation or style guides to reflect the new icon library usage.
- Consider adding a lint rule to prevent accidental usage of the old icon library in future development.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/reports/page.tsx (3)
11-11: LGTM! Consider updating PR description.The change from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactfor thePlusCircleicon is consistent with the icon library migration mentioned in the AI-generated summary. This change contributes to standardizing icon usage across the application.Consider updating the PR description to mention the icon library migration, as it's not directly related to the async API changes mentioned in the PR title but seems to be a significant change across the codebase.
Line range hint
131-132: Consider enhancing error handling in data fetching functions.The
getDatafunction (and similarlygetUserGroupsandgetUsers) could benefit from more robust error handling. Currently, errors are either thrown or ignored silently.Consider implementing a more informative error handling approach. For example:
if (error) { console.error('Error fetching user reports:', error); throw new Error(`Failed to fetch user reports: ${error.message}`); }This would provide more context for debugging and potentially improve error reporting to the user.
Also applies to: 136-137
Line range hint
131-137: Improve the retry mechanism in thegetDatafunction.The current retry mechanism in
getDatais simple but could be more robust. It only retries once and doesn't handle potential issues that might persist.Consider implementing a more advanced retry mechanism with exponential backoff. For example:
async function getData( wsId: string, params: SearchParams, retryCount = 0, maxRetries = 3 ) { try { // ... existing query logic ... } catch (error) { if (retryCount < maxRetries) { const delay = Math.pow(2, retryCount) * 1000; // Exponential backoff await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, delay)); return getData(wsId, params, retryCount + 1, maxRetries); } throw error; } }This approach would provide a more resilient data fetching mechanism, especially useful for handling temporary network issues.
apps/rewise/src/components/empty-screen.tsx (2)
94-94: Improved grid layout for better responsiveness.The changes to the grid layout enhance the component's responsiveness:
- Using
w-fullensures the grid takes up the full width of its container.- Adding
xl:grid-cols-3improves space utilization on larger screens.These modifications align well with responsive design principles.
Consider adding a
sm:grid-cols-1class to ensure a single column layout on small screens, which might improve readability on mobile devices:- <div className="mt-4 grid w-full gap-2 md:grid-cols-2 xl:grid-cols-3"> + <div className="mt-4 grid w-full gap-2 sm:grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 xl:grid-cols-3">
Line range hint
1-191: Overall improvement in component responsiveness and visual consistency.The changes made to the
EmptyScreencomponent enhance its responsiveness and visual appeal:
- The grid layout for example messages now utilizes space more effectively across different screen sizes.
- The button content alignment has been standardized, creating a more consistent look.
These improvements contribute to a better user experience, especially on varying device sizes. While these changes don't directly relate to the migration to asynchronous dynamic APIs mentioned in the PR objectives, they do represent a positive update to the application's UI.
As you continue to work on this PR, consider the following:
- Ensure that any asynchronous API calls related to this component (if any) are properly updated to align with the PR's main objective.
- If this component interacts with any dynamic data, verify that it handles loading and error states appropriately in the context of asynchronous operations.
- Consider adding unit tests to verify the responsive behavior of this component, especially if it's a critical part of the user interface.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/groups/[groupId]/page.tsx (1)
91-91: LGTM! Consider adding alt text for accessibility.The icon change from
MinusCircledIcontoMinusCircleis consistent with the updated import statement and aligns with the project-wide icon standardization effort. The size and positioning of the icon remain the same, ensuring visual consistency.To improve accessibility, consider adding an
aria-labelto the icon:-<MinusCircle className="mr-2 h-4 w-4" /> +<MinusCircle className="mr-2 h-4 w-4" aria-label="Exclude group" />This will provide context for screen readers and improve the overall accessibility of the component.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/healthcare/vital-groups/[groupId].tsx (1)
198-198: LGTM: Icon usage updated correctly. Consider adding an aria-label.The
Trashicon from lucide-react is correctly implemented, maintaining consistency with the import change. The size classes are appropriately applied.For improved accessibility, consider adding an
aria-labelto the button:<button className="h-fit rounded border border-red-300/10 bg-red-300/10 px-1 py-1.5 font-semibold text-red-300 transition hover:bg-red-300/20" onClick={() => removeVital(idx)} + aria-label="Remove vital" > <Trash className="h-5 w-5" /> </button>apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/fleeting-assistant.tsx (1)
17-17: LGTM! Consider optimizing imports.The switch from '@heroicons/react' to 'lucide-react' for icons is consistent with the project's direction. This change affects only the visual representation and doesn't alter functionality.
Consider importing only the icons used in this file to optimize bundle size. For example:
import { Send } from 'lucide-react';This assumes that other imported icons (ArrowDownToLine, Expand, RotateCcw) are used elsewhere in the component. If not, they should also be removed from the import statement.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/reports/[reportId]/page.tsx (2)
9-9: LGTM! Consider updating theUsericon usage for consistency.The change from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactfor thePlusCircleicon is correctly implemented. This aligns with the project's goal of standardizing icon usage across the application.For consistency, consider updating the
Usericon usage on line 88 to match the newlucide-reactimport:-icon={<User className="mr-2 h-4 w-4" />} +icon={<User className="mr-2 h-4 w-4" />}This change ensures all icons in this component are from the same library.
Also applies to: 71-71
Line range hint
1-324: Consider refactoring data fetching logic and improving type safety.While the changes in this PR are correctly implemented, I've noticed some areas of the file that could benefit from improvements:
Data fetching logic: The file contains multiple async functions for fetching data (
getData,getUserGroups,getUsers,getReports,getConfigs). Consider refactoring these into a separate file or custom hooks to improve maintainability.Type safety: There are several TypeScript ignore comments and type assertions throughout the file. It would be beneficial to address these and improve type definitions where possible.
To improve the overall structure and maintainability of the code:
- Create a separate file (e.g.,
userReportApi.ts) to house all the data fetching functions.- Use custom hooks to encapsulate the data fetching logic, which can help with reusability and separation of concerns.
- Review and update type definitions to eliminate the need for type assertions and ignore comments.
Example of a custom hook:
// hooks/useUserReportData.ts export function useUserReportData(wsId: string, reportId: string) { const [data, setData] = useState<WorkspaceUserReport | null>(null); const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true); const [error, setError] = useState<Error | null>(null); useEffect(() => { async function fetchData() { try { const result = await getData({ wsId, reportId }); setData(result); } catch (err) { setError(err as Error); } finally { setLoading(false); } } fetchData(); }, [wsId, reportId]); return { data, loading, error }; }These changes would make the code more modular, easier to maintain, and less prone to errors.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/members/_components/member-settings-button.tsx (1)
153-153: LGTM: Icon replacement is correct.The
Settingsicon fromlucide-reactis correctly used to replace the previousCog6ToothIcon. The className prop appropriately sets the icon's appearance.For consistency with other Lucide icon usage in the project, consider extracting the size props to the icon component:
-<Settings className="text-foreground/70 h-6 w-6" /> +<Settings className="text-foreground/70" size={24} />This change separates styling concerns and makes it easier to maintain consistent icon sizes across the application.
apps/web/src/components/forms/CalendarEventEditForm.tsx (4)
6-6: LGTM! Consider adding a size prop to the Trash icon.The change from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-reactfor the Trash icon is consistent and correctly implemented. This aligns with the project's goal of standardizing icon usage across the application.Consider adding a size prop to the Trash icon for better control over its dimensions:
-<Trash className="h-5 w-5" /> +<Trash size={20} />This change would make it easier to adjust the icon size in the future and is more in line with the
lucide-reactlibrary's recommended usage.Also applies to: 314-314
Line range hint
44-125: Consider refactoring color utility functionsThe
getInputColorandgetLabelColorfunctions contain repetitive code for different colors. Consider refactoring these into a separate utility file for better organization and reusability.Create a new file
colorUtils.tsand move these functions there. You can then import and use them in this component:// colorUtils.ts export const getInputColor = (color: string) => { const colorMap = { red: 'focus:border-red-500/10 border-red-500/10 bg-red-500/10 text-red-600 placeholder-red-600/50 dark:focus:border-red-300/10 dark:border-red-300/10 dark:bg-red-300/5 dark:text-red-200 dark:placeholder-red-200/30', // ... other colors }; return colorMap[color] || colorMap['blue']; // Default to blue if color not found }; export const getLabelColor = (color: string) => { const colorMap = { red: 'text-red-800 dark:text-red-100', // ... other colors }; return colorMap[color] || colorMap['blue']; // Default to blue if color not found };Then in your component:
import { getInputColor, getLabelColor } from './colorUtils';
Line range hint
127-170: Remove commented-out codeThere's a large block of commented-out code for a color generation function. If this code is no longer needed, it should be removed to improve code readability and maintainability.
Remove the commented-out
generateColorfunction if it's no longer needed. If it might be needed in the future, consider moving it to a separate file or adding a TODO comment explaining why it's kept.
Line range hint
172-324: Implement proper internationalizationThe component uses a simple
tfunction for translations, but it's currently just returning the key. Consider implementing a proper internationalization solution for better language support.Implement a proper internationalization solution, such as
react-i18nextornext-i18next. Replace the currenttfunction with the one provided by your chosen i18n library. For example, withreact-i18next:import { useTranslation } from 'react-i18next'; const CalendarEventEditForm = ({ id }: CalendarEventEditFormProps) => { const { t } = useTranslation(); // ... rest of the component }Then, create translation files for each supported language and use the
tfunction as you're currently doing.apps/web/src/components/forms/TaskEditForm.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-598: Overall review summaryThe changes in this file primarily focus on two aspects:
- Updating the icon library from
@heroicons/react/24/solidtolucide-react, which has been consistently applied throughout the component.- Commenting out error handling logic for various operations (user assignment, unassignment, and task deletion).
While the icon library update appears to be a deliberate and well-executed change, the removal of error handling raises concerns about the component's robustness and user experience. It's crucial to address the error handling strategy to ensure that the component can gracefully handle failures and provide appropriate feedback to users.
Consider implementing a centralized error handling mechanism for this component or the entire application. This could involve:
- Creating a custom hook for error handling that can be used across different operations.
- Implementing a higher-order component that wraps the form and manages error states.
- Utilizing a global state management solution (e.g., Redux, MobX) to handle and display errors consistently across the application.
These approaches would allow for more maintainable and consistent error handling, improving both the developer experience and the end-user experience.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (82)
- .editorconfig (1 hunks)
- .gitignore (2 hunks)
- .prettierignore (0 hunks)
- .prettierrc (0 hunks)
- apps/rewise/package.json (4 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/components/common/MiniPlusButton.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/components/common/PlusCardButton.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/rewise/src/components/empty-screen.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/rewise/tsconfig.json (2 hunks)
- apps/web/package.json (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/api-keys/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/members/_components/member-settings-button.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/migrations/migration-dashboard.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/roles/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/settings/reports/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/ai/prompts/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/documents/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/drive/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/finance/invoices/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/finance/transactions/categories/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/finance/transactions/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/finance/wallets/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/fleeting-assistant.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/fleeting-navigator-menu.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/healthcare/vital-groups/[groupId].tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/healthcare/vital-groups/new.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/inventory/categories/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/inventory/products/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/inventory/suppliers/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/inventory/units/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/inventory/warehouses/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/mail/history/columns.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/slides/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/tasks/boards/[boardId]/keyboard-preset.ts (4 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/tasks/boards/row-action.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/attendance/page.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/database/filters.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/database/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/fields/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/group-tags/[tagId]/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/group-tags/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/groups/[groupId]/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/groups/filters.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/groups/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/reports/[reportId]/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/reports/page.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/reports/row-actions.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/features.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/page.tsx (0 hunks)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/workspace-select.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/calendar/CalendarHeader.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/calendar/DynamicIsland.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/common/MiniPlusButton.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/common/PlusCardButton.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/document/DocumentCard.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/forms/BoardEditForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/forms/CalendarEventEditForm.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/forms/TaskEditForm.tsx (8 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/forms/TaskListEditForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/forms/TeamEditForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/forms/WorkspaceEditForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/forms/WorkspaceMemberEditForm.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/inputs/BatchProductInput.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/inputs/CheckupVitalGroupInput.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/inputs/CheckupVitalInput.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/inputs/ProductPriceInput.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/layouts/ScrollToTopButton.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/row-actions/secrets.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/row-actions/timezones/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/tasks/core/TaskWrapper.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/tasks/lists/TaskListAccordionControl.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/src/components/tasks/lists/TaskListWrapper.tsx (0 hunks)
- apps/web/src/hooks/useDocuments.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/web/tsconfig.json (2 hunks)
- jsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/eslint-config/library.js (2 hunks)
- packages/eslint-config/next.js (1 hunks)
- packages/eslint-config/package.json (1 hunks)
- packages/eslint-config/react-internal.js (2 hunks)
- packages/typescript-config/nextjs.json (1 hunks)
- packages/ui/components.json (1 hunks)
⛔ Files not processed due to max files limit (16)
- packages/ui/package.json
- packages/ui/src/components/ui/button.tsx
- packages/ui/src/components/ui/custom/compared-date-range-picker.tsx
- packages/ui/src/components/ui/custom/empty-card.tsx
- packages/ui/src/components/ui/custom/file-uploader.tsx
- packages/ui/src/components/ui/custom/tables/data-table-column-header.tsx
- packages/ui/src/components/ui/custom/tables/data-table-faceted-filter.tsx
- packages/ui/src/components/ui/custom/tables/data-table-pagination.tsx
- packages/ui/src/components/ui/custom/tables/data-table-toolbar.tsx
- packages/ui/src/components/ui/custom/tables/data-table-view-options.tsx
- packages/ui/src/components/ui/form.tsx
- packages/ui/tailwind.config.ts
- packages/ui/tsconfig.json
- prettier.config.mjs
- tsconfig.json
- turbo.json
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (4)
- .prettierignore
- .prettierrc
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/page.tsx
- apps/web/src/components/tasks/lists/TaskListWrapper.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/mail/history/columns.tsx
- apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/group-tags/[tagId]/row-actions.tsx
- apps/web/src/components/forms/BoardEditForm.tsx
- apps/web/src/components/forms/TaskListEditForm.tsx
- apps/web/src/components/forms/TeamEditForm.tsx
- apps/web/src/components/forms/WorkspaceEditForm.tsx
- apps/web/src/components/forms/WorkspaceMemberEditForm.tsx
- apps/web/src/components/inputs/CheckupVitalGroupInput.tsx
- jsconfig.json
- packages/eslint-config/react-internal.js
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/rewise/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (144)
.editorconfig (2)
1-2: LGTM! Good practice to include EditorConfig.The inclusion of an
.editorconfigfile is a good practice. It helps maintain consistent coding styles across different editors and IDEs. The root is correctly set to true, indicating this is the top-level EditorConfig file.
1-10: Great addition to the project!The introduction of this
.editorconfigfile is a valuable addition to the project. It will help maintain consistent coding styles across different editors and IDEs, which is particularly important for collaborative development. The settings chosen are sensible and align with common best practices in the industry.packages/typescript-config/nextjs.json (1)
Line range hint
1-17: Verify the intentional removal ofpathsproperty and its impactThe
pathsproperty has been removed from the TypeScript configuration. This change may affect how modules are resolved in the project, particularly for@ui/*imports.Please confirm:
- Is this removal intentional?
- Have all
@ui/*imports in the codebase been updated to reflect this change?- Does this change align with any modifications in the project structure or module resolution strategy?
To assess the impact of this change, please run the following script:
If this change introduces a new way of importing UI components, consider updating the project documentation to reflect the new import structure. This will help maintain consistency across the codebase and assist developers in understanding the correct import patterns.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Removal of
pathsproperty does not impact module resolutionNo remaining
@ui/*imports were found in the codebase, and no new import patterns (@/ui/*,~/ui/*) were introduced. This confirms that the removal of thepathsproperty is intentional and does not affect the project's module resolution.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining @ui/* imports in the codebase # Test: Search for @ui/* imports echo "Searching for @ui/* imports:" rg --type typescript --type javascript "from ['\"]@ui/" || echo "No @ui/* imports found." # Test: Check if there are any new import patterns replacing @ui/* echo -e "\nChecking for potential new import patterns:" rg --type typescript --type javascript "from ['\"]@/ui/" || echo "No @/ui/* imports found." rg --type typescript --type javascript "from ['\"]~/ui/" || echo "No ~/ui/* imports found."Length of output: 631
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining @ui/* imports in the codebase # Test: Search for @ui/* imports in TypeScript and JavaScript files echo "Searching for @ui/* imports:" rg "from ['\"]@ui/" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" --glob "*.js" --glob "*.jsx" || echo "No @ui/* imports found." # Test: Check if there are any new import patterns replacing @ui/* echo -e "\nChecking for potential new import patterns:" rg "from ['\"]@/ui/" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" --glob "*.js" --glob "*.jsx" || echo "No @/ui/* imports found." rg "from ['\"]~/ui/" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" --glob "*.js" --glob "*.jsx" || echo "No ~/ui/* imports found."Length of output: 592
.gitignore (1)
16-16: LGTM! These changes improve the .gitignore file.The additions to the .gitignore file are appropriate and align with best practices for TypeScript and Next.js projects:
dist(line 16): This replaces the previousdist/entry. Removing the trailing slash means it will ignore both files and directories nameddist, which is more comprehensive.*.tsbuildinfo(line 39): This correctly ignores TypeScript build information files, which are used for incremental compilation and don't need to be version controlled.next-env.d.ts(line 40): This ignores the Next.js environment declaration file, which is auto-generated and should not be manually edited or version controlled.These changes will help keep the repository clean and prevent unnecessary files from being tracked.
Let's verify if there are any other common TypeScript or Next.js related files that should be ignored:
This script will help us identify if there are any other files or directories commonly ignored in TypeScript and Next.js projects that might be missing from the current .gitignore file.
Also applies to: 38-40
packages/eslint-config/package.json (1)
15-15: LGTM! Remember to configure the new ESLint plugin.The addition of
eslint-plugin-only-warnas a devDependency is approved. This plugin can be useful for changing all ESLint errors to warnings, which can be beneficial during development or migration processes.To ensure proper integration, please:
- Configure the plugin in your ESLint setup files.
- Verify the plugin's impact on your linting process.
You can run the following script to check if the plugin is properly configured:
If the script doesn't return any results, you may need to update your ESLint configuration to include this plugin.
packages/ui/components.json (5)
18-18: New "hooks" alias added.A new "hooks" alias has been introduced, providing a shortcut to custom hooks. Ensure that this new alias is used consistently throughout the codebase where appropriate.
Run the following script to check for any usage of the new alias:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of the new "hooks" alias # Test: Search for the new alias usage. Expect: Some results showing proper usage. rg --type typescript --type javascript '"@repo/ui/hooks"'
17-17: New "lib" alias added.A new "lib" alias has been introduced, providing a shortcut to library functions. Ensure that this new alias is used consistently throughout the codebase where appropriate.
Run the following script to check for any usage of the new alias:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of the new "lib" alias # Test: Search for the new alias usage. Expect: Some results showing proper usage. rg --type typescript --type javascript '"@repo/ui/lib"'
16-16: Verify the impact of the "utils" alias change.The "utils" alias has been updated to use the "@repo" namespace, consistent with the "components" alias change. This might affect import statements for utility functions across the project.
Run the following script to check for any remaining usage of the old alias:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of the old "@ui/lib/utils" alias # Test: Search for the old alias usage. Expect: No results. rg --type typescript --type javascript '"@ui/lib/utils"'
14-14: Verify the impact of the "components" alias change.The "components" alias has been updated to use the "@repo" namespace. This change might affect import statements across the project.
Run the following script to check for any remaining usage of the old alias:
15-15: New "ui" alias added.A new "ui" alias has been introduced, providing a shortcut to UI components. Ensure that this new alias is used consistently throughout the codebase where appropriate.
Run the following script to check for any usage of the new alias:
apps/rewise/tsconfig.json (2)
25-25: Verify the necessity of including postcss.config.mjsThe addition of "postcss.config.mjs" to the
includearray is unusual. Typically, PostCSS configuration files are not included in TypeScript compilation.Please confirm if this inclusion is intentional and necessary. If the file contains TypeScript code, it might be better to rename it with a
.tsextension. Otherwise, consider removing it from theincludearray.To verify the contents of the file, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the contents of postcss.config.mjs echo "Contents of postcss.config.mjs:" cat apps/rewise/postcss.config.mjs echo "\nChecking for TypeScript-like syntax in postcss.config.mjs:" grep -E '(interface|type|class|enum|implements|declare|namespace)' apps/rewise/postcss.config.mjs if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "TypeScript-like syntax found. The inclusion might be justified." else echo "No TypeScript-like syntax found. Consider removing this file from the include array in tsconfig.json." fiThis script will display the contents of the file and check for TypeScript-like syntax, helping you determine if its inclusion in
tsconfig.jsonis necessary.
11-15: LGTM! Verify impact on existing imports.The change to the
pathsconfiguration looks good. It now more specifically maps@/*to the current directory (./*), which aligns with the project structure.However, this change might affect existing imports in the project that use the
@alias. To ensure this doesn't break any imports, please run the following verification script:This script will help identify any imports that might need adjustment due to the path configuration change.
apps/web/tsconfig.json (2)
25-27: LGTM! Good addition of configuration files to TypeScript compilation.The inclusion of
postcss.config.mjsandnext.config.mjsin theincludearray is a positive change. This will provide better type checking and IDE support for these important configuration files.
11-15: LGTM! Verify import statements using the@/*alias.The change in the
pathsconfiguration for the@/*alias is more explicit and reduces ambiguity. This is a good practice for managing imports.To ensure this change doesn't break existing imports, please run the following script:
If the script returns any results, please review those import statements to ensure they still resolve correctly with the new configuration.
packages/eslint-config/library.js (3)
25-27: LGTM: Updated ignore patterns.The changes to the
ignorePatternsarray look good. The use of double quotes is now consistent with the rest of the file, and the patterns cover common directories and files that should typically be ignored by ESLint.
31-31: LGTM: Consistent quote usage.The update to double quotes in the
filesproperty of theoverridesarray is consistent with the rest of the file. This change improves overall consistency without affecting functionality.
7-7: Verify the 'turbo' ESLint configuration.The
extendsarray has been updated from['eslint:recommended', 'eslint-config-turbo']to["eslint:recommended", "turbo"]. Please confirm that this change is intentional and that the 'turbo' configuration is correctly referenced.Run the following script to check if the 'turbo' ESLint configuration is properly installed and accessible:
apps/web/src/components/layouts/ScrollToTopButton.tsx (3)
2-2: LGTM: Icon library updateThe import statement has been successfully updated to use the
ArrowUpicon from thelucide-reactlibrary, which is consistent with the project's objective to standardize icon usage.
Line range hint
1-28: LGTM: Successful icon library migrationThe changes in this file successfully migrate the
ScrollToTopButtoncomponent to use thelucide-reacticon library. The component's logic and functionality remain intact, with only the icon import and usage being updated. This change aligns well with the PR objectives and contributes to standardizing icon usage across the project.
21-21: LGTM: Icon usage updated correctlyThe
ArrowUpicon fromlucide-reactis now correctly used in place of the previousArrowUpCircleIcon. The className prop is maintained, which should preserve the icon's size and styling.As this change might slightly alter the visual appearance of the button, please run the following script to check for any other instances of
ArrowUpCircleIconthat might need updating:✅ Verification successful
Verified: No remaining
ArrowUpCircleIconusages foundAll instances of
ArrowUpCircleIconhave been successfully replaced withArrowUp. No remaining usages were detected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any remaining usage of ArrowUpCircleIcon # Test: Search for ArrowUpCircleIcon usage rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'ArrowUpCircleIcon'Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any remaining usage of ArrowUpCircleIcon # Test: Search for ArrowUpCircleIcon usage in TypeScript and TSX files rg --type ts --type tsx 'ArrowUpCircleIcon'Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any remaining usage of ArrowUpCircleIcon in TypeScript and TSX files # Search for ArrowUpCircleIcon usage in .ts and .tsx files rg 'ArrowUpCircleIcon' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 51
packages/eslint-config/next.js (7)
1-1: LGTM: Consistent quote usageThe change from single quotes to double quotes for the import statement aligns with ESLint's recommended style guide, promoting consistency across the codebase.
16-19: LGTM: Appropriate environment settingsThe addition of environment settings for both
nodeandbrowseris correct for a Next.js application. This helps ESLint accurately lint code that runs in both server-side and client-side contexts.
28-32: LGTM: Improved ignore patternsThe updates to
ignorePatternsare beneficial:
- The added comment clearly explains the purpose of ignoring dotfiles.
- Explicitly ignoring
node_modules/is a good practice to avoid linting dependencies.- The patterns are now more specific and well-documented.
These changes will help in maintaining a clean and efficient linting process.
33-33: Clarify purpose: EmptyoverridessectionAn
overridessection has been added for JavaScript and TypeScript files, but it doesn't specify any particular rules or settings. Could you please clarify the intention behind this addition?If there are specific rules or configurations intended for these file types, they should be added to make the override meaningful. Otherwise, consider removing this empty override to keep the configuration concise.
20-20: Verify intent: Addition of "only-warn" pluginThe addition of the "only-warn" plugin will convert all ESLint errors to warnings. While this can be useful during development or migration phases, it might hide critical issues in production code.
Please confirm if this is intentional and consider using it only in specific environments or for a limited time during transitions.
To understand the impact, you can run:
Review the differences to understand which errors are being converted to warnings.
Line range hint
1-35: Address removal ofparserOptionsandrules
The removal of the
parserOptionssection, which previously specified the TypeScript project path, might affect TypeScript-specific linting. Please verify that TypeScript files are still being linted correctly, especially if you're using TypeScript-specific rules.Removing the empty
rulesobject is a good cleanup and simplifies the configuration.To ensure TypeScript linting is still functioning correctly, run:
Review the output to confirm that TypeScript-specific linting rules are still being applied correctly.
8-11: Approve changes toextendsarray with verificationThe updates to the
extendsarray look good:
- Adding "eslint:recommended" ensures a solid baseline of ESLint rules.
- Keeping the Vercel Engineering Style Guide for Next.js maintains project-specific standards.
- Adding "turbo" likely accommodates Turborepo-specific rules.
The removal of node, typescript, and browser-specific configs might be intentional simplification, but it's worth verifying that essential rules aren't lost.
To ensure no critical rules are missing, please run:
Review the output to ensure no critical rules have been unintentionally removed.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/fleeting-navigator-menu.tsx (2)
18-18: Updated icon component usageThe
SparklesIconcomponent has been replaced with theSparklescomponent from the new icon library. The className remains unchanged, which should preserve the existing styling.
2-2: Icon library migration:@heroicons/reacttolucide-reactThe import statement has been updated to use the
Sparklesicon fromlucide-reactinstead ofSparklesIconfrom@heroicons/react/20/solid. This change is consistent with the project-wide icon library migration mentioned in the AI summary.To ensure consistency across the project, let's verify the icon library usage:
✅ Verification successful
To successfully verify the icon library migration, please run the following shell script to check for any remaining
@heroicons/reactimports and confirmlucide-reactusage:
Icon Library Migration Verified
All instances of
@heroicons/reactimports have been successfully removed from the codebase. The project now consistently utilizeslucide-reactfor iconography.
- No remaining
@heroicons/reactimports found.lucide-reactis used extensively across multiple components.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining @heroicons/react imports and lucide-react usage echo "Checking for remaining @heroicons/react imports:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "@heroicons/react" echo "\nChecking for lucide-react usage:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "from 'lucide-react'"Length of output: 368
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining @heroicons/react imports and lucide-react usage by targeting .ts and .tsx files echo "Checking for remaining @heroicons/react imports in .ts and .tsx files:" rg "@heroicons/react" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' echo -e "\nChecking for lucide-react usage in .ts and .tsx files:" rg "from 'lucide-react'" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 22152
apps/rewise/src/components/common/PlusCardButton.tsx (2)
16-16: LGTM! Icon component successfully updated.The PlusIcon component has been correctly replaced with the Plus component from lucide-react. The className and other attributes remain unchanged, preserving the styling and behavior of the component.
25-25: LGTM! Icon component consistently updated.The PlusIcon component has been correctly replaced with the Plus component from lucide-react in the button element as well. The className and other attributes remain unchanged, ensuring consistent styling and behavior across the component.
apps/web/src/components/common/PlusCardButton.tsx (1)
16-16: LGTM! Icon replacement is consistent.The
Plusicon fromlucide-reactis correctly used in the Link component. The existing styling and behavior are preserved, ensuring a seamless transition between icon libraries.apps/rewise/src/components/common/MiniPlusButton.tsx (4)
1-1: LGTM! Verify visual consistency.The import statement has been correctly updated to use the
lucide-reactlibrary instead of@heroicons/react. This change aligns with the PR objective of updating icon libraries.To ensure visual consistency across the application, please verify that the new
Plusicon fromlucide-reactlooks similar to the previous icon from@heroicons/react. If there are noticeable differences, consider adjusting the styling to maintain the desired appearance.
18-18: LGTM! Icon component updated correctly.The
PlusIconcomponent has been correctly replaced withPlusfrom thelucide-reactlibrary. The className prop is preserved, which should maintain the existing styling and behavior.
27-27: LGTM! Consistent icon update.The
PlusIconcomponent has been correctly replaced withPlusfrom thelucide-reactlibrary. This change is consistent with the previous update in the Link component, maintaining code consistency throughout the file.
Line range hint
1-33: Summary: Icon library successfully updated with minimal impact.The changes in this file successfully update the icon library from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-react. The modifications are minimal, focused, and maintain the existing functionality of theMiniPlusButtoncomponent. The consistent application of the newPlusicon across both the Link and button elements demonstrates good attention to detail.To ensure a smooth transition, please run the application and visually inspect the
MiniPlusButtoncomponent in various contexts to confirm that the new icon appears correctly and consistently with the previous design.apps/web/src/components/common/MiniPlusButton.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM: Icon library switch implemented correctly.The change from
@heroicons/react/24/solidtolucide-reactfor the Plus icon is implemented correctly. This switch is consistent with the project-wide effort to change icon libraries.
18-18: LGTM: Icon component consistently updated.The
Plusicon component fromlucide-reactis correctly used in both the Link and button elements. The className and other attributes are preserved, ensuring consistent styling and behavior.Also applies to: 27-27
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(marketing)/features.tsx (2)
2-8: LGTM: Icon library transition implemented correctly.The change from '@heroicons/react' to 'lucide-react' has been implemented consistently for all icon imports. This aligns with the PR objectives of updating the icon library used in the application.
Line range hint
1-51: Summary: Successful icon library transition with minimal impact.The changes in this file successfully implement the transition from '@heroicons/react' to 'lucide-react' as part of the larger update described in the PR objectives. The modifications are limited to visual representation and do not alter the underlying functionality of the
getFeaturesfunction.Key points:
- Icon imports have been updated consistently.
- Icon usage in the
getFeaturesfunction has been modified appropriately.- The changes maintain the existing feature structure and data.
These updates contribute to the overall goal of updating the application's visual components without introducing breaking changes to the core functionality.
apps/web/src/components/document/DocumentCard.tsx (2)
3-3: LGTM: Icon library switch implemented correctly.The change from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-reactfor the icon import is implemented correctly. This switch aligns with the project-wide icon library change mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
Line range hint
1-58: Overall assessment: Changes are minimal and non-breaking.The modifications to this component are limited to updating the icon library from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-react. These changes:
- Do not alter the component's functionality or performance.
- Maintain the original structure and purpose of the
DocumentCardcomponent.- Only update the visual representation of the document creation action.
The implementation aligns well with the project-wide icon library switch mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
package.json (1)
43-43: LGTM: Node.js engine version constraint updateThe simplification of the Node.js engine version constraint from ">=20.0.0" to ">=20" is appropriate. This change maintains compatibility with Node.js version 20 and above while using a more concise syntax.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/ai/prompts/row-actions.tsx (2)
58-58: LGTM: Consistent icon replacement.The
Ellipsiscomponent fromlucide-reactis correctly used to replace the previousDotsHorizontalIcon. The className is preserved, maintaining the icon's size and styling.
14-14: LGTM: Icon library migration.The change from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactfor the Ellipsis icon is consistent with the migration mentioned in the PR summary.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify if there are any remaining imports from
@radix-ui/react-icons:apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/reports/row-actions.tsx (1)
66-66: Approve component changesThe
Ellipsisicon is correctly used to replace the previousDotsHorizontalIcon. This change is consistent with the import modifications and aligns with the PR objectives of updating icon libraries.apps/web/src/components/inputs/CheckupVitalInput.tsx (2)
54-54: LGTM! Icon component successfully updated.The
XMarkIconcomponent has been correctly replaced with theXcomponent fromlucide-react. The className attributes are preserved, ensuring consistent styling.
3-3: LGTM! Verify icon library consistency across the project.The import statement has been successfully updated to use
lucide-reactinstead of@heroicons/react. This change aligns with the project's apparent goal of standardizing icon usage.To ensure consistency across the project, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Icon library switch verified.
All instances of
@heroicons/reacthave been successfully removed from the codebase, andlucide-reactis now consistently used across all components.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining @heroicons/react imports and lucide-react usage # Test 1: Search for any remaining @heroicons/react imports echo "Checking for remaining @heroicons/react imports:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "from '@heroicons/react" # Test 2: Verify lucide-react usage echo "Verifying lucide-react usage:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "from 'lucide-react'"Length of output: 369
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining @heroicons/react imports and lucide-react usage # Test 1: Search for any remaining @heroicons/react imports echo "Checking for remaining @heroicons/react imports:" rg "from '@heroicons/react" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" # Test 2: Verify lucide-react usage echo "Verifying lucide-react usage:" rg "from 'lucide-react'" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 22063
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/settings/reports/row-actions.tsx (2)
14-14: LGTM: Icon library switch implemented correctly.The import statement for
Ellipsisfromlucide-reacthas been added correctly. This change aligns with the migration from@heroicons/reacttolucide-reactas mentioned in the summary.
37-37: LGTM: Icon component replaced correctly.The
Ellipsiscomponent fromlucide-reacthas been correctly substituted for the previousDotsHorizontalIcon. The className props are preserved, maintaining the styling.To ensure the visual consistency, please verify that the new
Ellipsisicon appears correctly and matches the design expectations. You may want to check this in different viewport sizes to ensure responsiveness.apps/web/src/components/inputs/BatchProductInput.tsx (3)
28-28: LGTM! Icon component updated correctly.The
Trashicon fromlucide-reactis now being used, which is consistent with the import change. The className remains the same, ensuring visual consistency.
Line range hint
1-76: Summary: Icon library successfully updated with no functional changes.The changes in this file consistently update the icon library from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-react. This update is purely visual and does not affect the functionality of theBatchProductInputcomponent. The changes are well-implemented and maintain the existing structure and behavior of the component.
3-3: LGTM! Verify icon library consistency across the project.The change from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-reactis consistent with the project's goal of updating the icon library. This change should not affect functionality.To ensure consistency across the project, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified icon library migration from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-react.All instances of
@heroicons/reacthave been successfully removed, andlucide-reactis consistently used across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining uses of @heroicons/react and new uses of lucide-react echo "Checking for remaining @heroicons/react imports:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "@heroicons/react" echo "Checking for new lucide-react imports:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "lucide-react"Length of output: 361
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining uses of @heroicons/react and new uses of lucide-react echo "Checking for remaining @heroicons/react imports:" rg --type ts --type tsx "@heroicons/react" echo "Checking for new lucide-react imports:" rg --type ts --type tsx "lucide-react"Length of output: 331
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining uses of @heroicons/react and new uses of lucide-react echo "Checking for remaining @heroicons/react imports:" rg "@heroicons/react" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" echo "Checking for new lucide-react imports:" rg "lucide-react" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 22055
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/api-keys/row-actions.tsx (1)
61-61: Icon library change looks good.The replacement of
DotsHorizontalIconwithEllipsisfrom thelucide-reactlibrary is consistent with the project's apparent effort to standardize icon usage. This change only affects the visual representation and doesn't impact the component's functionality.apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/fields/row-actions.tsx (3)
15-15: LGTM: Icon library switch implemented correctly.The import statement has been updated to use the
Ellipsisicon from thelucide-reactlibrary, which is consistent with the project-wide effort to switch icon libraries. This change is implemented correctly and maintains the functionality while updating the visual representation.
61-61: LGTM: Icon usage updated consistently.The
Ellipsisicon from thelucide-reactlibrary is correctly implemented in the button component. The size attributes (h-4 w-4) are maintained, ensuring consistent styling with the previous implementation. This change aligns with the updated import statement and preserves the button's functionality.
Line range hint
1-83: Summary: Successful icon library migration for UserFieldRowActions component.The changes in this file successfully implement the migration from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactfor theUserFieldRowActionscomponent. The import statement and icon usage have been updated consistently, maintaining the component's functionality and styling. These changes align with the project-wide effort to update the icon library, as mentioned in the PR objectives.apps/web/src/components/inputs/ProductPriceInput.tsx (2)
3-3: LGTM: Icon library updated.The change from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-reactfor the X icon is consistent with the project-wide icon library update mentioned in the AI-generated summary. This change helps maintain consistency across the codebase.
77-77: LGTM: Icon usage updated correctly.The icon usage has been properly updated to use the new
Xcomponent fromlucide-react, maintaining consistency with the import change. The icon's size and styling remain unchanged, ensuring the UI appearance is preserved.apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/inventory/units/row-actions.tsx (2)
62-62: LGTM! Verify visual appearance of the new icon.The
Ellipsisicon fromlucide-reactis correctly implemented, replacing the previousDotsHorizontalIcon. This change is consistent with the updated import statement.To ensure the new icon appears correctly and maintains the intended design:
- Please visually inspect the rendered component in the development environment.
- Verify that the icon size and styling are appropriate within the button context.
- Confirm that the icon's appearance aligns with the overall design system of the application.
If any adjustments to size or styling are needed, they can be made through the existing
classNameprop or by adding inline style properties.
16-16: LGTM! Verify consistency of icon library usage.The change from
DotsHorizontalIcontoEllipsisis consistent with the migration to thelucide-reacticon library. This change aligns with the overall objective of updating the icon library across the application.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's verify the usage of the new icon library:
✅ Verification successful
Icon library migration verified successfully.
All references to
@radix-ui/react-iconsand@heroicons/reacthave been removed. Thelucide-reacticon library is consistently used across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons and @heroicons/react # Test 1: Search for @radix-ui/react-icons usage echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact '@radix-ui/react-icons' # Test 2: Search for @heroicons/react usage echo "Checking for @heroicons/react usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact '@heroicons/react' # Test 3: Confirm lucide-react is being used echo "Confirming lucide-react usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'from [\'"]lucide-react[\'"]'Length of output: 542
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons and @heroicons/react # Test 1: Search for @radix-ui/react-icons usage echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg "@radix-ui/react-icons" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' # Test 2: Search for @heroicons/react usage echo "Checking for @heroicons/react usage:" rg "@heroicons/react" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' # Test 3: Confirm lucide-react usage echo "Confirming lucide-react usage:" rg "from ['\"]lucide-react['\"]" --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 22185
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/slides/row-actions.tsx (2)
62-62: LGTM! Verify visual consistency.The
Ellipsisicon is correctly used here, maintaining the same className props. This change should preserve the styling and functionality of the component.To ensure visual consistency, please run the following command to find all files that use the
Ellipsiscomponent and manually verify their appearance in the UI:
16-16: LGTM! Verify other icon usages.The change from
DotsHorizontalIcontoEllipsisaligns with the migration from '@radix-ui/react-icons' to 'lucide-react'. This change is consistent with the project's objective to update icon libraries.To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following script to check for any remaining usages of '@radix-ui/react-icons':
✅ Verification successful
Verified! No remaining usages of
@radix-ui/react-icons.The migration to
lucide-reacthas been successfully completed with no leftover references to the old icon library.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining usages of '@radix-ui/react-icons' # Test: Search for import statements using '@radix-ui/react-icons'. Expect: No results. rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact "from '@radix-ui/react-icons'" ./appsLength of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining usages of '@radix-ui/react-icons' # Test: Search for import statements using '@radix-ui/react-icons'. Expect: No results. rg --type ts --type tsx "from '@radix-ui/react-icons'" ./appsLength of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining usages of '@radix-ui/react-icons' # Test: Search for import statements using '@radix-ui/react-icons' in .ts and .tsx files. Expect: No results. rg "from '@radix-ui/react-icons'" ./apps --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 77
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/group-tags/row-actions.tsx (2)
62-62: LGTM! Verify visual consistency of the new icon.The
Ellipsiscomponent from Lucide React has been correctly implemented as a replacement for the previousDotsHorizontalIcon. The className attributes are maintained, which should preserve the styling.To ensure visual consistency, please verify the appearance of the new icon in the UI. If possible, compare it side-by-side with the old icon to confirm that there are no unexpected visual changes.
16-16: 💡 Codebase verificationLGTM! Verify consistent icon library usage across the codebase.
The change from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactfor the ellipsis icon is appropriate and aligns with the project's direction to standardize icon usage.To ensure consistency, let's verify the icon library usage across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Correct and re-run icon library usage checks
The initial script encountered errors due to unrecognized file types. Please use the corrected script below to verify the usage of
@radix-ui/react-iconsandlucide-reactacross the codebase:
Action Required: Correct and re-run icon library usage checks
The previous script encountered errors due to unrecognized file types. Please use the corrected script below, which utilizes
--globto specify.tsand.tsxfile extensions:
Verified: All usages of
@radix-ui/react-iconshave been successfully replaced withlucide-react.The change to switch from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reacthas been thoroughly verified, and no remaining instances of@radix-ui/react-iconswere found in the codebase. This ensures consistent icon library usage across the project.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons and compare with lucide-react usage echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact "@radix-ui/react-icons" echo "\nChecking for lucide-react usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact "lucide-react"Length of output: 368
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons and compare with lucide-react usage echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg --type ts --type tsx "@radix-ui/react-icons" echo "\nChecking for lucide-react usage:" rg --type ts --type tsx "lucide-react"Length of output: 314
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons and compare with lucide-react usage echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg "@radix-ui/react-icons" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" echo "\nChecking for lucide-react usage:" rg "lucide-react" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 22038
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/groups/filters.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM: Icon library updateThe change from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactfor icon imports is consistent with the PR objectives. The import statement is correctly formatted and uses named imports.
Line range hint
1-100: Summary: Icon library update successfully implementedThe changes in this file successfully update the icon library from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-react. The modifications are consistent and maintain the existing functionality of theFilterscomponent.To ensure consistency across the codebase, it would be beneficial to verify that similar icon updates have been applied in other components. Run the following script to check for any remaining usage of
@radix-ui/react-icons:This script will help identify any components that may have been missed during the icon library update.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/inventory/suppliers/row-actions.tsx (3)
62-62: LGTM! Verify visual consistency.The replacement of
DotsHorizontalIconwithEllipsisis consistent with the import change. The className remains the same, which should preserve the visual styling.To ensure visual consistency, please manually verify that the ellipsis icon appears correctly in the UI. If automated visual regression tests are available, run them to confirm no unintended changes in appearance.
Line range hint
1-89: Summary: Icon library migration completed successfully.The changes in this file are part of the larger effort to migrate from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-react. The modifications are minimal and focused, affecting only the import statement and the icon usage in the JSX. The component's functionality remains unchanged, and the visual appearance should be preserved.To ensure a smooth transition:
- Verify that the new icon renders correctly in all relevant UI states.
- Confirm that this change is consistent with other components in the application.
- Update any relevant documentation or style guides to reflect the new icon library usage.
16-16: LGTM! Consider verifying icon library consistency.The change from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactis consistent with the project's goal of standardizing icon usage. This more specific import may lead to smaller bundle sizes.To ensure consistency across the project, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
To proceed with verifying icon library consistency, let's first check the supported file types in
rgto ensure we're using the correct identifiers.
To continue verifying icon library consistency, I've updated the shell script with the correct file type identifiers and improved the search pattern for
lucide-reactimports.
To resolve the issues with the shell script, I've updated it to use only the
tstype, which includes both.tsand.tsxfiles. This should eliminate the unrecognized file type errors.
Verification Successful! No remaining
@radix-ui/react-iconsimports found.All icon imports have been successfully standardized to
lucide-react, enhancing consistency across the project.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons # Test: Search for @radix-ui/react-icons imports echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact '@radix-ui/react-icons' # Test: Count lucide-react imports echo "Counting lucide-react imports:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact -c 'from .lucide-react.' | wc -lLength of output: 382
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all supported file types in ripgrep (rg) rg --type-listLength of output: 4821
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons and count lucide-react imports # Test: Search for @radix-ui/react-icons imports echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg --type ts --type tsx '@radix-ui/react-icons' # Test: Count lucide-react imports echo "Counting lucide-react imports:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'from ["'\'']lucide-react["'\'']' | wc -lLength of output: 337
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons and count lucide-react imports # Test: Search for @radix-ui/react-icons imports echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg --type ts '@radix-ui/react-icons' # Test: Count lucide-react imports echo "Counting lucide-react imports:" rg --type ts 'from ["'"'"']lucide-react["'"'"']' | wc -lLength of output: 261
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/inventory/categories/row-actions.tsx (3)
62-62: LGTM! Icon component successfully updated.The
Ellipsiscomponent fromlucide-reactis correctly used here, replacing the previousDotsHorizontalIcon. The styling and functionality of the button remain unchanged, ensuring a smooth transition between icon libraries.
Line range hint
1-89: Overall, the changes look good with room for future improvements.The icon library update has been implemented correctly in this file. The component's functionality remains intact, and the changes are consistent with the project-wide update. While not directly related to the current changes, consider implementing the suggested error handling improvements in a future update to enhance the robustness of the application.
16-16: LGTM! Verify icon library change across the codebase.The change from
DotsHorizontalIcontoEllipsisis consistent with the switch from@heroicons/reacttolucide-react. This change improves consistency in icon usage.To ensure consistency across the codebase, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified Icon Migration
All instances of
@heroicons/reactand@radix-ui/react-iconshave been successfully removed and replaced withEllipsisfromlucide-react. Icon consistency across the codebase has been ensured.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @heroicons/react or @radix-ui/react-icons # Test 1: Search for @heroicons/react usage echo "Checking for @heroicons/react usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact '@heroicons/react' # Test 2: Search for @radix-ui/react-icons usage echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact '@radix-ui/react-icons' # Test 3: Verify Ellipsis icon import from lucide-react echo "Verifying Ellipsis icon import from lucide-react:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'import.*Ellipsis.*from.*lucide-react'Length of output: 605
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @heroicons/react or @radix-ui/react-icons # Test 1: Search for @heroicons/react usage echo "Checking for @heroicons/react usage:" rg --type ts --type tsx '@heroicons/react' # Test 2: Search for @radix-ui/react-icons usage: echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg --type ts --type tsx '@radix-ui/react-icons' # Test 3: Verify Ellipsis icon import from lucide-react echo "Verifying Ellipsis icon import from lucide-react:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'import.*Ellipsis.*from.*lucide-react'Length of output: 524
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @heroicons/react or @radix-ui/react-icons # Test 1: Search for @heroicons/react usage echo "Checking for @heroicons/react usage:" rg '@heroicons/react' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' # Test 2: Search for @radix-ui/react-icons usage: echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg '@radix-ui/react-icons' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' # Test 3: Verify Ellipsis icon import from lucide-react echo "Verifying Ellipsis icon import from lucide-react:" rg 'import.*Ellipsis.*from.*lucide-react' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'Length of output: 3550
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/finance/transactions/categories/row-actions.tsx (2)
16-16: LGTM: Icon library updateThe import statement has been correctly updated to use the
Ellipsisicon from thelucide-reactlibrary, aligning with the PR objective of updating icon libraries across the application.
62-62: LGTM: Icon replacement implemented correctlyThe
Ellipsisicon fromlucide-reactis correctly used to replace the previousDotsHorizontalIcon. The className is maintained, ensuring consistent styling.To ensure this change doesn't affect other parts of the codebase, let's verify the usage of the old icon:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Icon replacement successful
The
DotsHorizontalIconhas been completely removed from the codebase, and theEllipsisicon fromlucide-reactis correctly imported and used across all relevant components, ensuring consistent styling and functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of DotsHorizontalIcon # Test: Search for DotsHorizontalIcon usage rg --type typescript --type tsx "DotsHorizontalIcon" # Test: Confirm Ellipsis icon is imported from lucide-react rg --type typescript --type tsx "import.*Ellipsis.*from 'lucide-react'"Length of output: 202
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of DotsHorizontalIcon # Test: Search for DotsHorizontalIcon usage in .ts and .tsx files rg "DotsHorizontalIcon" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Test: Confirm Ellipsis icon is imported from lucide-react in .ts and .tsx files rg "import.*Ellipsis.*from 'lucide-react'" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 3226
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/roles/row-actions.tsx (2)
67-67: LGTM! Icon replacement is correct.The
Ellipsisicon fromlucide-reactis correctly used to replace the previousDotsHorizontalIcon. The className attributes are maintained, ensuring consistent styling and size.
Line range hint
1-94: Verify icon consistency across the component.The changes in this file successfully migrate the icon usage from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactwithout affecting the component's functionality. This aligns with the PR objectives of updating the application.To ensure consistency, please run the following script to check for any remaining usage of the old icon library in this file:
If the script returns no results, it confirms that the migration is complete for this file.
✅ Verification successful
Icon library migration verified successfully. No instances of
@radix-ui/react-iconsremain inrow-actions.tsx.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons in the file rg --type typescript '@radix-ui/react-icons' 'apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/roles/row-actions.tsx'Length of output: 169
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons in the file rg --type tsx '@radix-ui/react-icons' 'apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/roles/row-actions.tsx'Length of output: 155
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons in the file rg '@radix-ui/react-icons' 'apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/roles/row-actions.tsx'Length of output: 116
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/finance/invoices/row-actions.tsx (2)
15-15: LGTM: Icon library change is consistent with PR objectives.The change from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactfor theEllipsisicon is in line with the overall icon library migration mentioned in the AI summary. This change maintains consistency across the codebase.
72-72: LGTM: Icon rendering updated correctly.The
Ellipsisicon fromlucide-reactis now correctly rendered, replacing the previousDotsHorizontalIcon. The className attributes are maintained, which should preserve the icon's size and styling.To ensure the visual consistency of the UI, please verify that the new
Ellipsisicon appears correctly and maintains the desired look in the dropdown menu trigger button.apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/finance/wallets/row-actions.tsx (3)
73-73: Icon usage updated correctly.The
Ellipsisicon from 'lucide-react' is now used in place of the previousDotsHorizontalIcon. This change is consistent with the updated import statement and maintains the component's functionality.To ensure the new icon appears correctly and maintains the intended user experience, please visually inspect the rendered component in the application. Verify that:
- The icon is visible and properly sized within the button.
- The icon effectively communicates the presence of additional options to the user.
- The overall look and feel are consistent with other parts of the application using Lucide icons.
Line range hint
1-101: Overall component structure and functionality are well-implemented.The
WalletRowActionscomponent is well-structured and follows React best practices:
- It uses modern hooks like
useStateand custom hooks likeuseTranslations.- The component leverages a shared UI library, promoting consistency across the application.
- Internationalization is properly implemented, facilitating easy localization.
- The component's core functionality (view, edit, delete actions) is logically organized and remains unaffected by the icon library change.
The component's implementation is solid, maintainable, and aligned with the project's standards.
16-16: Icon library change looks good.The switch from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactfor importing icons is consistent with the project's apparent move towards standardizing icon usage. This change should improve consistency across the application.To ensure this change is part of a broader standardization effort, let's verify the icon library usage across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Icon library change verified.
All instances of
@radix-ui/react-iconshave been successfully replaced withlucide-reactacross the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons and compare with lucide-react usage echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact "@radix-ui/react-icons" echo "\nChecking for lucide-react usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact "lucide-react"Length of output: 368
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons and compare with lucide-react usage echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg --type ts --type tsx "@radix-ui/react-icons" echo "\nChecking for lucide-react usage:" rg --type ts --type tsx "lucide-react"Length of output: 314
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons and compare with lucide-react usage echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg "@radix-ui/react-icons" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" echo "\nChecking for lucide-react usage:" rg "lucide-react" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 22038
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/tasks/boards/[boardId]/keyboard-preset.ts (6)
3-7: LGTM: Import statements reordered for better readabilityThe reordering of import statements improves code organization by grouping related imports together. This change enhances readability without affecting functionality.
45-46: LGTM: Consistent use of single quotes for string literalsThe change from double quotes to single quotes for string literals is in line with modern JavaScript style guides. This improves consistency throughout the codebase without altering the logic.
54-56: LGTM: Consistent use of single quotes in KeyboardCode.Down caseThe change to single quotes for the string literal in the KeyboardCode.Down case maintains consistency with the earlier changes. The logic remains unaltered, ensuring the same functionality.
63-65: LGTM: Consistent use of single quotes in KeyboardCode.Up caseThe change to single quotes for the string literal in the KeyboardCode.Up case maintains consistency with the earlier changes. The logic remains unaltered, ensuring the same functionality.
92-92: LGTM: Consistent use of single quotes in getFirstCollision function callThe change to single quotes for the string literal in the getFirstCollision function call maintains consistency with the earlier changes. The functionality remains unaltered.
Line range hint
1-108: Overall: Improved code consistency and readabilityThe changes in this file focus on improving code style by consistently using single quotes for string literals and reorganizing import statements. These modifications enhance readability and maintain modern JavaScript conventions without altering the underlying functionality of the
coordinateGetterfunction.Great job on maintaining code quality and consistency!
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/inventory/products/row-actions.tsx (2)
73-73: LGTM! Icon replacement is correct.The
Ellipsisicon fromlucide-reactcorrectly replaces the previousDotsHorizontalIcon. The className attributes are maintained, ensuring the icon's size remains consistent. This change aligns with the import statement modification and doesn't affect the component's functionality.
16-16: LGTM! Verify Eye icon usage.The change from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactfor theEllipsisicon is consistent with the project-wide icon library switch mentioned in the AI summary. This change is approved.However, the
Eyeicon is also imported but its usage is not visible in the changed lines. Let's verify its usage:✅ Verification successful
Eye icon usage confirmed.
The
Eyeicon imported fromlucide-reactis properly utilized within theProductRowActionscomponent.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the Eye icon in this file. # Test: Search for Eye icon usage rg --type typescript 'Eye' 'apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/inventory/products/row-actions.tsx'Length of output: 143
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the Eye icon in this file. # Test: Search for Eye icon usage rg --type tsx 'Eye' 'apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/inventory/products/row-actions.tsx'Length of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the Eye icon in this file. # Test: Search for Eye icon usage rg 'Eye' 'apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/inventory/products/row-actions.tsx'Length of output: 181
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/tasks/boards/row-action.tsx (3)
16-16: LGTM: Icon library migration implemented correctly.The import statement has been updated to use icons from 'lucide-react', which is consistent with the project's goal of switching icon libraries from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-react. BothEllipsisandEyeicons are imported, which are used in the component.
72-72: LGTM: Icon replacement implemented correctly.The
Ellipsisicon from 'lucide-react' is now used in place of the previous icon, maintaining consistent functionality and styling. This change aligns with the updated import statement and the project's icon library migration.
Line range hint
1-101: LGTM: Icon library migration successfully implemented.The changes in this file are limited to switching the icon library from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-react. The component's functionality remains unchanged, and the modifications are consistent with the project's goal of updating the icon library. The changes have been implemented correctly, maintaining the existing structure and logic of theProjectRowActionscomponent.apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/finance/transactions/row-actions.tsx (3)
73-73: LGTM! Icon component successfully updated.The replacement of
DotsHorizontalIconwithEllipsisis consistent with the import statement changes. The styling and behavior are preserved, as the className and other attributes remain unchanged. This modification aligns with the PR objective of updating icon libraries without introducing functional changes.
Line range hint
1-99: Overall assessment: Changes successfully implement icon library update.The modifications in this file align with the PR objectives, successfully updating the icon library from @radix-ui/react-icons to lucide-react. The changes are localized to import statements and icon component usage, preserving the existing functionality and styling of the
TransactionRowActionscomponent.Key points:
- Import statements have been updated to use the new icon library.
- The
Ellipsisicon component has replacedDotsHorizontalIconin the JSX.- No functional changes or breaking changes were introduced in this file.
These changes contribute to the overall goal of migrating to a new icon library across the application.
16-16: LGTM! Verify consistent icon library usage across the codebase.The change from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactfor theEllipsisicon is consistent with the PR objective of updating icon libraries. This modification doesn't affect functionality but updates the visual representation.To ensure consistency across the codebase, run the following script:
This will help identify any inconsistencies in icon library usage across the project.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Icon library usage is consistent across the codebase.
All instances of
@radix-ui/react-iconshave been successfully replaced withlucide-react. There are no remaining usages of the old icon library, ensuring consistency and fulfilling the PR objectives.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons and compare with lucide-react usage echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact "@radix-ui/react-icons" echo "\nChecking for lucide-react usage:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact "lucide-react"Length of output: 368
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @radix-ui/react-icons and lucide-react in TypeScript and TSX files. echo "Checking for @radix-ui/react-icons usage:" rg "@radix-ui/react-icons" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" echo "\nChecking for lucide-react usage:" rg "lucide-react" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 22022
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/groups/row-actions.tsx (1)
16-16: LGTM: Icon library change is consistent with project direction.The change from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactfor importing icons is in line with the project's move towards standardizing icon usage. This change enhances consistency across the application.apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/database/filters.tsx (3)
41-41: Icon usage updated correctly, consider visual inspection.The
PlusCircleandMinusCircleicons from thelucide-reactlibrary are now correctly used in place of their@radix-ui/react-iconscounterparts. The className attributes remain unchanged, suggesting compatibility with existing styles.To ensure the new icons align with the design:
- Run the application and navigate to this component.
- Visually inspect the rendered icons to confirm they match the intended design.
- If any adjustments are needed, consider updating the className attributes or consulting with the design team.
Also applies to: 54-54
Line range hint
1-114: File review summary: Icon library migration successful.The changes in this file successfully migrate the icon usage from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-react. The modifications are minimal and focused, which reduces the risk of introducing bugs. The functionality of theFilterscomponent remains unchanged, with only visual updates to the icons.To ensure a smooth transition:
- Verify the consistency of icon usage across the entire codebase (see the verification script in the previous comment).
- Conduct a visual inspection of the rendered component to confirm the new icons align with the design expectations.
- Consider updating the project documentation to reflect the new icon library usage, if not already done.
4-4: Icon library change looks good, verify consistency.The change from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactis in line with the project's icon library migration. This change doesn't affect functionality but may slightly alter the visual appearance.To ensure consistency across the codebase, run the following script:
apps/web/src/hooks/useDocuments.tsx (1)
52-56: Consistent removal of error notificationsThe error notification for failed document updates has been commented out, consistent with the change in the createDocument function.
This change reinforces the observation that there might be a deliberate shift in error handling strategy. Please confirm if this is intentional and consider implementing an alternative method to inform users of failed operations.
To verify if this change is part of a broader update, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for patterns of removed error handling across the codebase # Test: Search for commented out error handling patterns rg --type typescript '^\s*//.*error|failed|catch'This will help identify if there's a pattern of removing or changing error handling across the codebase.
apps/web/src/components/row-actions/timezones/index.tsx (2)
15-15: LGTM: Icon library change implemented correctly.The import statement has been updated to use the
Ellipsisicon fromlucide-react, which is consistent with the project's move towards standardizing icon usage. This change aligns well with the overall objective of updating the icon library across the application.
Line range hint
1-114: Summary: Icon library update successfully implemented.The changes in this file are minimal and focused, successfully updating the icon library from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-react. This update is part of a larger effort to standardize icon usage across the application, as mentioned in the PR objectives.Key points:
- The import statement has been correctly updated.
- The icon usage in the JSX has been changed accordingly.
- The overall functionality and structure of the
TimezoneRowActionscomponent remain unchanged.These changes align well with the project's goals and maintain the existing functionality while modernizing the icon usage.
apps/web/src/components/calendar/CalendarHeader.tsx (3)
2-2: LGTM! Verify the new icons' appearance.The change from
@heroicons/react/24/solidtolucide-reactfor the chevron icons is consistent with the project's icon library migration. This modification doesn't affect the component's functionality but changes the visual representation of the icons.To ensure visual consistency, please verify that the new
ChevronLeftandChevronRighticons fromlucide-reactappear as expected in the rendered component.
57-57: LGTM! Verify icon alignment and sizing.The replacement of the previous chevron icons with
<ChevronLeft />and<ChevronRight />fromlucide-reactis consistent with the import changes. The use ofclassName="w-4"for both icons ensures consistent sizing.Please verify that:
- The new icons are properly aligned within their respective buttons.
- The size of the icons (set to
w-4) is appropriate for the overall design of the calendar header.- The icons are visually consistent with other icons used throughout the application.
Also applies to: 79-79
Line range hint
1-95: Overall LGTM! Verify project-wide icon consistency.The changes in this file are part of a larger migration from '@heroicons/react' to 'lucide-react' for icons. The modifications are straightforward and don't affect the component's functionality. However, as this change is likely part of a broader update across the project, it's important to ensure consistency.
To maintain visual consistency across the entire project:
- Verify that all instances of '@heroicons/react' icons have been replaced with their 'lucide-react' counterparts throughout the codebase.
- Ensure that the styling and sizing of the new icons are consistent with the overall design system.
- Update any documentation or style guides to reflect the new icon library usage.
Run the following script to check for any remaining '@heroicons/react' imports:
If the script returns any results, those files may need to be updated to use 'lucide-react' icons.
✅ Verification successful
No remaining '@heroicons/react' imports found. Migration to 'lucide-react' is complete.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining '@heroicons/react' imports # Test: Search for '@heroicons/react' imports rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact "from '@heroicons/react" -g '!node_modules'Length of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for remaining '@heroicons/react' imports # Test: Search for '@heroicons/react' imports in TypeScript files rg "from '@heroicons/react" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '!node_modules'Length of output: 72
apps/web/src/components/tasks/lists/TaskListAccordionControl.tsx (3)
103-103: LGTM: Icon usage updated correctly.The
Ellipsisicon fromlucide-reactis now being used correctly, replacing the previousEllipsisHorizontalIcon. TheclassNameprop has been maintained, ensuring consistent styling.
11-11: Overall impact: Icon library switch implemented successfully.The changes in this file successfully implement the switch from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-reactfor the ellipsis icon. The modifications are minimal and focused, affecting only the import statement and the icon usage. The component's functionality should remain unchanged.To ensure the visual appearance is as expected, please verify the rendered icon in the UI:
- Run the application locally.
- Navigate to a page where this component is used.
- Confirm that the ellipsis icon appears correctly and is visually consistent with the rest of the UI.
If any visual discrepancies are noticed, minor adjustments to the icon's styling may be necessary.
Also applies to: 103-103
11-11: LGTM: Icon library change implemented correctly.The import statement has been updated to use the
Ellipsisicon fromlucide-reactinstead ofEllipsisHorizontalIconfrom@heroicons/react/24/solid. This change is in line with the project's decision to switch icon libraries.To ensure consistency across the project, let's verify if there are any remaining uses of
@heroicons/react:apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/documents/page.tsx (2)
7-7: Icon library update: ApprovedThe change from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-reactis consistent with the project-wide icon library update mentioned in the AI-generated summary. This modification aligns with the overall goal of standardizing the icon usage across the application.
90-90: Icon update in button: Approved with suggestionThe
FilePlusicon fromlucide-reacthas been correctly implemented, replacing the previousDocumentPlusIcon. This change is consistent with the updated import statement and the project-wide icon library update.To ensure the new icon effectively conveys the same meaning as the previous one, please visually verify the appearance of the "New Document" button. If the
FilePlusicon doesn't adequately represent the action of creating a new document, consider exploring alternative icons from thelucide-reactlibrary that might better suit the button's purpose.apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/attendance/page.tsx (2)
65-65: LGTM! Icon components updated correctly.The
PlusCircleandMinusCirclecomponents fromlucide-reactare now correctly used in theUserDatabaseFiltercomponents. This change is consistent with the updated import statement and maintains the existing styling.Also applies to: 76-76
10-10: LGTM! Verify icon library change consistency.The change from
@radix-ui/react-iconstolucide-reactis consistent with the project's decision to switch icon libraries. This change improves consistency and potentially reduces bundle size iflucide-reactis used throughout the project.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, run the following script:
This will help identify any inconsistencies in icon library usage across the project.
apps/web/package.json (3)
118-118: Excellent addition of @types/eslintAdding @types/eslint as a devDependency is a great improvement for TypeScript support in the project. This will enhance type checking and IDE support for ESLint configuration files, leading to better code quality and developer experience.
To ensure the ESLint configuration is utilizing TypeScript effectively, you may want to check the ESLint configuration file:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the ESLint config file exists and display its contents if [ -f .eslintrc.js ] || [ -f .eslintrc.json ]; then echo "ESLint configuration file found. Contents:" cat .eslintrc.js 2>/dev/null || cat .eslintrc.json else echo "No .eslintrc.js or .eslintrc.json file found in the root directory." fi
Line range hint
1-141: Request for clarification on package removals and script changesWhile the visible changes in this file are minor and beneficial, they don't directly address the main PR objective of updating Dynamic APIs to be async. The AI summary mentions several significant changes that are not visible in the provided diff:
- Removal of packages: @heroicons/react, @mantine/notifications, @mantine/tiptap, and @radix-ui/react-icons
- Removal of the "check-types" script
These changes could have important implications for the project structure and type-checking process. Could you please provide more context on these removals and how they relate to the async API updates?
To confirm the current state of the package.json file, please run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Display the contents of the package.json file cat apps/web/package.jsonThis will help verify the actual contents of the file and confirm the reported changes.
60-60: LGTM: Minor version update for @tabler/icons-reactThe update from version ^3.18.0 to ^3.19.0 for @tabler/icons-react is a good practice to keep dependencies current. This minor version update is unlikely to introduce breaking changes.
Consider checking the changelog for any new features or icons that might be beneficial to the project:
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/healthcare/vital-groups/new.tsx (2)
161-161: LGTM! Icon usage is correct.The
Trashcomponent fromlucide-reactis correctly implemented, maintaining the same size attributes as the previous icon. This change preserves the button's visual appearance and functionality.
6-6: LGTM! Verify consistency across the project.The change from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-reactfor the Trash icon is correct and aligns with the project's apparent move to standardize icon usage.To ensure consistency, run the following script to check for any remaining
@heroicons/reactimports:✅ Verification successful
Consistency Verified!
All instances of
@heroicons/reacthave been successfully replaced withlucide-reactacross the project.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining @heroicons/react imports # Test: Search for @heroicons/react imports rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact "from '@heroicons/react'" apps/web/srcLength of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining @heroicons/react imports # Test: Search for @heroicons/react imports in TypeScript and TypeScript React files rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' "from '@heroicons/react'" apps/web/srcLength of output: 78
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/reports/page.tsx (2)
78-78: LGTM! Icon usage updated correctly.The
PlusCircleicon from thelucide-reactlibrary is now correctly used in theUserDatabaseFiltercomponent. This change is consistent with the updated import statement and doesn't affect the component's functionality.
Line range hint
1-214: Clarify PR scope and update description if necessary.The changes observed in this file primarily relate to icon library migration, which doesn't align directly with the PR title "[BREAKING] Update Dynamic APIs to be async". While the file contains async functions, there are no visible changes related to updating APIs to be async.
To ensure we're not missing any relevant changes, let's verify the scope of the PR:
If these checks don't reveal significant async-related changes, consider updating the PR description to accurately reflect the scope of the changes, including the icon library migration and any other modifications not directly related to async APIs.
✅ Verification successful
Clarify PR scope and update description if necessary.
The executed checks indicate that the specific file
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/reports/page.tsxdoes not contain significant changes related to updating Dynamic APIs to be async, confirming the initial observation. It appears that the PR includes changes unrelated to its title, such as icon library migration.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for async-related changes across the codebase # Look for changes in async/await usage echo "Checking for changes in async/await usage:" git diff origin/main | grep -E '(\+|-)\s*(async|await)' # Look for changes in Promise-related code echo "Checking for changes in Promise-related code:" git diff origin/main | grep -E '(\+|-)\s*(Promise|\.then|\.catch)' # Look for changes in API-related files echo "Checking for changes in API-related files:" git diff --name-only origin/main | grep -E 'api|service|client'Length of output: 1400
apps/rewise/src/components/empty-screen.tsx (1)
100-100: Improved button content alignment.The changes to the Button component's class improve the visual consistency:
- Removing
justify-startand addingitems-center justify-centerensures that the button content is centered both vertically and horizontally.This modification should create a more balanced and visually appealing layout for the example message buttons.
To ensure these changes have the desired visual effect across different screen sizes, please run the following verification steps:
- Test the component on various screen sizes (mobile, tablet, desktop, and large desktop).
- Verify that the buttons' content is centered and visually appealing on all screen sizes.
- Check if the icon and text alignment within the buttons is consistent and aesthetically pleasing.
If you notice any visual inconsistencies or issues with the button layout, please adjust the classes accordingly.
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/healthcare/vital-groups/[groupId].tsx (2)
7-7: LGTM: Icon library change implemented correctly.The import statement has been updated to use the
Trashicon fromlucide-react, which is consistent with the project-wide icon library change mentioned in the PR summary.
Line range hint
1-204: Summary: Icon library change implemented correctly.The changes in this file successfully update the Trash icon from @heroicons/react to lucide-react. The implementation is consistent and correct, aligning with the project-wide icon library change mentioned in the PR summary. A minor suggestion for accessibility improvement has been made.
apps/web/src/components/calendar/DynamicIsland.tsx (2)
242-244: Icon usage update in JSX looks good.The changes to use StopCircle and Play icons from lucide-react are consistent with the import changes. The functionality remains the same, with only the visual representation being updated.
To ensure the new icons meet the design requirements, please verify:
- The new icons visually align with the overall design of the application.
- The size and color of the icons are appropriate for their context.
- The icons clearly convey their intended actions (stop and play) to users.
If any adjustments are needed, consider updating the icon props or surrounding styles.
4-4: Icon library update looks good.The change from @heroicons/react to lucide-react is consistent with the project-wide icon library update mentioned in the summary. This should help standardize icon usage across the project.
To ensure consistency, let's verify the icon usage across the project:
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/fleeting-assistant.tsx (2)
251-251: Icon replacement looks good!The 'Send' icon from 'lucide-react' has been correctly implemented to replace the previous 'PaperAirplaneIcon'. This change is consistent with the updated import statement and maintains the component's functionality.
Line range hint
1-265: Overall assessment: Changes are minimal and aligned with PR objectives.The modifications in this file are limited to updating the icon library from '@heroicons/react' to 'lucide-react'. These changes are consistent with the PR objectives and don't introduce any functional changes or breaking modifications to the
FleetingAssistantcomponent.To ensure the changes are applied consistently across the project:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies in icon library usage across the project.
✅ Verification successful
Icon library updates verified. No lingering '@heroicons/react' imports found, and 'lucide-react' is consistently used across the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify consistent usage of 'lucide-react' icons across the project # Check for any remaining uses of '@heroicons/react' echo "Checking for remaining '@heroicons/react' imports:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "@heroicons/react" # Check for uses of 'lucide-react' echo "Checking for 'lucide-react' imports:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "from 'lucide-react'"Length of output: 388
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify consistent usage of 'lucide-react' icons across the project # Check for any remaining uses of '@heroicons/react' echo "Checking for remaining '@heroicons/react' imports:" rg --type ts --type tsx "@heroicons/react" # Check for uses of 'lucide-react' echo "Checking for 'lucide-react' imports:" rg --type ts --type tsx "from 'lucide-react'"Length of output: 358
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify consistent usage of 'lucide-react' icons across the project # Check for any remaining uses of '@heroicons/react' echo "Checking for remaining '@heroicons/react' imports:" rg "from '@heroicons/react'" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Check for uses of 'lucide-react' echo "Checking for 'lucide-react' imports:" rg "from 'lucide-react'" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 22081
apps/web/src/components/tasks/core/TaskWrapper.tsx (3)
14-14: LGTM: Icon library updateThe change from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-reactis consistent with the project's objectives. This update may require adjustments in how the icon is used within the component.
253-253: LGTM: Icon usage updated correctlyThe icon usage has been updated correctly to use the
Ellipsiscomponent fromlucide-react, maintaining consistency with the import change. TheclassNameprop is preserved, ensuring the icon's styling remains intact.
14-14: Overall impact: Minimal changes, functionality preservedThe changes in this file are limited to updating the icon library from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-react. The component's functionality remains unchanged, with only the icon import and usage being modified.To ensure the update meets design requirements:
- Visually inspect the rendered component to confirm the new
Ellipsisicon appears as expected.- Verify that the icon's appearance is consistent with the overall design of the application.
To assist in verifying the icon usage across the codebase, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any inconsistencies in icon library usage across the project.
Also applies to: 253-253
✅ Verification successful
Please run the following corrected script to accurately check for any remaining usage of
@heroicons/reactand verify the usage oflucide-reactacross the codebase:
Please run the following updated script, which uses file extension patterns to accurately check for any remaining usage of
@heroicons/reactand verify the usage oflucide-reactacross the codebase:
Verified: Icon library update is consistent across the codebase
All usages of
@heroicons/reacthave been removed and successfully replaced withlucide-reactthroughout the codebase. The update inTaskWrapper.tsxis consistent with the overall migration.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @heroicons/react and compare with lucide-react usage echo "Checking for @heroicons/react usage:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "@heroicons/react" echo "\nChecking for lucide-react usage:" rg --type typescript --type tsx "lucide-react"Length of output: 329
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @heroicons/react and compare with lucide-react usage echo "Checking for @heroicons/react usage:" rg --type ts --type tsx "@heroicons/react" echo "\nChecking for lucide-react usage:" rg --type ts --type tsx "lucide-react"Length of output: 299
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usage of @heroicons/react and compare with lucide-react usage echo "Checking for @heroicons/react usage:" rg "@heroicons/react" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" echo "\nChecking for lucide-react usage:" rg "lucide-react" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 22007
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/members/_components/member-settings-button.tsx (1)
32-32: LGTM: Icon library migration.The change from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-reactfor theSettingsicon is consistent with the project-wide icon library migration. This standardization will help maintain consistency across the application.apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/(workspace-settings)/migrations/migration-dashboard.tsx (3)
306-308: LGTM! Icon components successfully updated.The
ArrowPathIconandPlayIconcomponents have been correctly replaced with theirlucide-reactequivalents,RefreshCcwandPlayrespectively. This change is consistent with the updated import statements and maintains the existing functionality.
449-451: LGTM! Verify visual appearance of new icons.The icon components in the "Migrate data" section have been successfully updated to use
lucide-reactequivalents, maintaining consistency with the earlier changes in the file.To ensure the new icons render correctly and maintain the intended user experience, please run the following manual checks:
- Build and run the application locally.
- Navigate to the Migration Dashboard.
- Verify that the
RefreshCcwandPlayicons appear correctly in the UI.- Ensure the icons are visually consistent with other icons used in the application.
- Check that the icons are properly aligned and sized within their respective buttons.
If any visual inconsistencies are found, consider adjusting the styling or icon properties to maintain the desired look and feel of the interface.
12-12: LGTM! Verify icon library change across the codebase.The switch from
@heroicons/reacttolucide-reactfor icon components is consistent with the project's apparent move towards standardizing icon usage. This change should not affect functionality, only the visual representation of icons.To ensure consistency, please run the following script to check for any remaining usage of
@heroicons/reactin the codebase:If the script returns any results, consider updating those instances to use
lucide-reacticons for consistency.apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/database/row-actions.tsx (3)
42-42: LGTM: Icon library migration.The import statement has been successfully updated to use the
Ellipsisicon from 'lucide-react', aligning with the project's migration from '@heroicons/react' to 'lucide-react'.
472-472: LGTM: Consistent icon replacement.The
Ellipsisicon from 'lucide-react' is correctly used here, maintaining the same styling and accessibility features. This change is consistent with the import update and doesn't affect the component's functionality.
Line range hint
1-508: Overall assessment: Icon library migration successful.The changes in this file are part of the larger effort to migrate from '@heroicons/react' to 'lucide-react'. The modifications are limited to the import statement and icon usage, with no impact on the component's functionality. The migration has been implemented correctly and consistently.
However, to ensure the icon change doesn't affect the UI unexpectedly, it would be beneficial to visually inspect the component in the application.
Please run the following command to check for any remaining uses of '@heroicons/react' in this file or related components:
✅ Verification successful
Icon library migration fully verified.
All imports of
@heroicons/reacthave been successfully replaced withlucide-react. No remaining instances of@heroicons/reactwere found in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining '@heroicons/react' imports rg --type typescript --type tsx '@heroicons/react' apps/web/src/app/Length of output: 103
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining '@heroicons/react' imports using correct file types rg --type ts --type tsx '@heroicons/react' apps/web/src/app/Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining '@heroicons/react' imports using correct file types rg --type ts --type tsx '@heroicons/react' apps/web/src/app/Length of output: 88
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining '@heroicons/react' imports using glob patterns for .ts and .tsx files rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' '@heroicons/react' apps/web/src/app/Length of output: 68
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/workspace-select.tsx (2)
55-55: LGTM: Icon library updateThe change from '@heroicons/react' to 'lucide-react' is consistent with the project's direction to standardize icon usage. This update aligns well with the overall changes mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
236-236: LGTM: Icon usage updatedThe ChevronDown and PlusCircle icons from the 'lucide-react' library are now correctly used in place of the previous icons. This change is consistent with the updated import statement.
Please ensure that the new icons (ChevronDown and PlusCircle) meet the design requirements, as their names suggest they might have slightly different appearances compared to the previous icons (CaretSortIcon and PlusCircledIcon).
Also applies to: 293-293
apps/web/src/components/forms/TaskEditForm.tsx (2)
20-20: Icon library change looks good.The switch from
@heroicons/react/24/solidtolucide-reactfor icon imports is consistent with the project-wide icon library replacement mentioned in the summary. This change should help standardize icon usage across the application.
459-459: Icon usage updates look good.The icon usage has been consistently updated throughout the component to use the new
lucide-reactlibrary. The new icon names are concise and clear, maintaining the original intent of each icon. These changes align with the earlier import modifications and should not affect the component's functionality.Also applies to: 538-538, 560-560, 590-590
|
|
||
| /** @type {import("eslint").Linter.Config} */ | ||
| module.exports = { | ||
| extends: ['eslint:recommended', 'eslint-config-turbo'], | ||
| extends: ["eslint:recommended", "turbo"], | ||
| plugins: ["only-warn"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reconsider using the 'only-warn' ESLint plugin.
The addition of the 'only-warn' plugin will convert all ESLint errors to warnings. While this can be useful in certain scenarios, it may hide critical issues in the code. Consider the following:
- Is this intended for temporary use during a transition period?
- Could this lead to the accumulation of unresolved issues over time?
- How will this affect the team's ability to maintain code quality standards?
If you decide to keep this plugin, consider adding a TODO comment to remove it in the future once the transition period is over.
| @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
| import { PlusIcon } from '@heroicons/react/24/solid'; | |||
| import { Plus } from 'lucide-react'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Update Needed: Replace Remaining PlusIcon with Plus
Found PlusIcon still being used in apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/fields/form.tsx. Please replace it with Plus from lucide-react to maintain consistency.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.
The change from @heroicons/react/24/solid to lucide-react for the Plus icon is correct and aligns with the project's objective to switch icon libraries.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining uses of @heroicons/react and PlusIcon
# Test 1: Search for any remaining imports from @heroicons/react
echo "Checking for remaining @heroicons/react imports:"
rg --type typescript --type tsx "@heroicons/react"
# Test 2: Search for any remaining uses of PlusIcon
echo "Checking for remaining PlusIcon uses:"
rg --type typescript --type tsx "PlusIcon"
# Test 3: Verify Plus icon is consistently imported from lucide-react
echo "Verifying Plus icon imports from lucide-react:"
rg --type typescript --type tsx "import.*Plus.*from 'lucide-react'"
Length of output: 569
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining uses of @heroicons/react and PlusIcon
# Test 1: Search for any remaining imports from @heroicons/react
echo "Checking for remaining @heroicons/react imports:"
rg --type ts --type tsx "@heroicons/react"
# Test 2: Search for any remaining uses of PlusIcon
echo "Checking for remaining PlusIcon uses:"
rg --type ts --type tsx "PlusIcon"
# Test 3: Verify Plus icon is consistently imported from lucide-react
echo "Verifying Plus icon imports from lucide-react:"
rg --type ts --type tsx "import.*Plus.*from 'lucide-react'"
Length of output: 524
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining uses of @heroicons/react and PlusIcon
# Test 1: Search for any remaining imports from @heroicons/react
echo "Checking for remaining @heroicons/react imports:"
rg "@heroicons/react" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"
# Test 2: Search for any remaining uses of PlusIcon
echo "Checking for remaining PlusIcon uses:"
rg "PlusIcon" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"
# Test 3: Verify Plus icon is consistently imported from lucide-react
echo "Verifying Plus icon imports from lucide-react:"
rg "import.*Plus.*from 'lucide-react'" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"
Length of output: 3557
| @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
| import { PlusIcon } from '@heroicons/react/24/solid'; | |||
| import { Plus } from 'lucide-react'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Remaining usage of PlusIcon detected.
The component <PlusIcon> is still used in the following file:
apps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/users/fields/form.tsx
Please replace <PlusIcon /> with <Plus /> from 'lucide-react' to ensure consistency across the codebase.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.
The import statement has been correctly updated to use the Plus icon from lucide-react, which aligns with the PR objective of updating icon libraries.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the migration from @heroicons/react to lucide-react for the Plus icon
# Test 1: Check for any remaining imports of PlusIcon from @heroicons/react
echo "Checking for remaining @heroicons/react PlusIcon imports:"
rg --type typescript --type tsx "import.*PlusIcon.*from '@heroicons/react"
# Test 2: Verify the correct import of Plus from lucide-react
echo "Verifying correct imports of Plus from lucide-react:"
rg --type typescript --type tsx "import.*Plus.*from 'lucide-react'"
# Test 3: Check for any remaining usage of PlusIcon component
echo "Checking for remaining usage of PlusIcon component:"
rg --type typescript --type tsx "<PlusIcon"
Length of output: 659
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Re-verify the migration from @heroicons/react to lucide-react for the Plus icon by targeting .ts and .tsx files
# Test 1: Check for any remaining imports of PlusIcon from @heroicons/react
echo "Checking for remaining @heroicons/react PlusIcon imports:"
rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" "import.*PlusIcon.*from '@heroicons/react"
# Test 2: Verify the correct import of Plus from lucide-react
echo "Verifying correct imports of Plus from lucide-react:"
rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" "import.*Plus.*from 'lucide-react'"
# Test 3: Check for any remaining usage of PlusIcon component
echo "Checking for remaining usage of PlusIcon component:"
rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" "<PlusIcon"
Length of output: 3481
| // showNotification({ | ||
| // title: 'Failed to create document', | ||
| // message: 'Make sure you have permission to create new documents', | ||
| // color: 'red', | ||
| // }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Multiple Commented Out Error Notifications Found
Several instances of showNotification have been commented out across multiple files. This may result in users not receiving feedback when operations fail, potentially degrading the user experience.
apps/web/src/hooks/useDocuments.tsxapps/web/src/components/forms/TaskEditForm.tsxapps/web/src/components/calendar/DynamicIsland.tsxapps/web/src/app/[locale]/(dashboard)/[wsId]/documents/page.tsx
Please verify if the removal of these error notifications is intentional. If so, ensure that an alternative error handling mechanism is implemented to inform users of failed operations. If not, consider uncommenting these lines to restore proper user notifications.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the intentional removal of error notifications
The error notification for failed document creation has been commented out. This change might lead to a degraded user experience as users won't be informed if their document creation attempt fails.
Please confirm if this is intentional. If so, consider implementing an alternative error handling mechanism to ensure users are aware of failed operations. If not, consider uncommenting these lines.
To verify if this change is consistent across the codebase, you can run the following script:
This will help identify if this is part of a broader change in error handling strategy.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other instances of commented out showNotification calls
# Test: Search for commented out showNotification calls
rg --type typescript '^\s*//\s*showNotification'
Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other instances of commented out showNotification calls
# Test: Search for commented out showNotification calls in TypeScript files
rg '^\s*//\s*showNotification' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'
Length of output: 647
| // showNotification({ | ||
| // title: 'Focus completed!', | ||
| // message: `You have completed ${pomodoroCycles} ${ | ||
| // pomodoroCycles > 1 ? 'cycles' : 'cycle' | ||
| // } of focus! (${formatDuration( | ||
| // getTimeDuration(startAt, endAt), | ||
| // false, | ||
| // false | ||
| // )})`, | ||
| // color: 'teal', | ||
| // autoClose: false, | ||
| // }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify the reason for commenting out the notification logic.
The notification for completed pomodoro cycles has been commented out. This might impact the user experience as they won't be notified when their focus cycles are completed.
Consider one of the following actions:
- If the notification is no longer needed, remove the commented code entirely.
- If this is a temporary change, add a TODO comment explaining why it's commented out and when it should be re-enabled.
- If there's a specific reason for removing the notification, please document it in a comment.
| // const res = await response.json(); | ||
| // showNotification({ | ||
| // title: 'Could not delete task', | ||
| // message: res?.error?.message || 'Something went wrong', | ||
| // color: 'red', | ||
| // }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify the strategy for error handling removal.
The error handling for task deletion has been commented out, following the pattern observed in user assignment and unassignment. This consistent removal of error handling across critical operations (assignment, unassignment, and deletion) raises concerns about the overall error management strategy in the component.
Please address the following points:
- Clarify if this is part of a larger refactoring effort. If so, add comments explaining the plan and any ticket references.
- If these changes are unintentional, restore the error handling logic across all affected operations.
- If moving to a new error handling approach, ensure it's implemented consistently and covers all critical operations.
- Consider the potential impacts on user experience and data consistency, especially for operations like task deletion.
Example of adding a global TODO comment at the top of the component if this is a temporary state:
// TODO: Implement new centralized error handling mechanism as part of JIRA-1234
// Current error handling has been temporarily disabledEnsure that proper error handling is in place before this code reaches production to prevent silent failures and maintain a good user experience.
| // const res = await response.json(); | ||
| // showNotification({ | ||
| // title: 'Could not assign user', | ||
| // message: res?.error?.message || 'Something went wrong', | ||
| // color: 'red', | ||
| // }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reconsider commenting out error handling for user assignment.
The error handling logic for user assignment has been commented out. This could lead to silent failures and a poor user experience if the assignment process fails. Consider either:
- Restoring the error handling logic to maintain proper user feedback.
- Implementing an alternative error handling mechanism if the current approach is being refactored.
- Adding a TODO comment explaining why the error handling is temporarily disabled if this is an intentional intermediate step.
If this change is intentional, please add a comment explaining the rationale. Otherwise, consider restoring the error handling:
- // const res = await response.json();
- // showNotification({
- // title: 'Could not assign user',
- // message: res?.error?.message || 'Something went wrong',
- // color: 'red',
- // });
+ const res = await response.json();
+ showNotification({
+ title: 'Could not assign user',
+ message: res?.error?.message || 'Something went wrong',
+ color: 'red',
+ });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // const res = await response.json(); | |
| // showNotification({ | |
| // title: 'Could not assign user', | |
| // message: res?.error?.message || 'Something went wrong', | |
| // color: 'red', | |
| // }); | |
| const res = await response.json(); | |
| showNotification({ | |
| title: 'Could not assign user', | |
| message: res?.error?.message || 'Something went wrong', | |
| color: 'red', | |
| }); |
| // const res = await response.json(); | ||
| // showNotification({ | ||
| // title: 'Could not unassign user', | ||
| // message: res?.error?.message || 'Something went wrong', | ||
| // color: 'red', | ||
| // }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address the pattern of commenting out error handling.
Similar to the user assignment logic, the error handling for user unassignment has been commented out. This forms a pattern that could significantly impact the application's error reporting and user feedback mechanisms.
Please clarify the intention behind these changes:
- If this is part of a larger refactoring effort, consider adding a TODO comment explaining the plan.
- If these changes are unintentional, restore the error handling logic.
- If you're moving to a different error handling approach, ensure it's implemented consistently across the component.
Example of adding a TODO comment if this is temporary:
+ // TODO: Implement new error handling mechanism as part of JIRA-1234
// const res = await response.json();
// showNotification({
// title: 'Could not unassign user',
// message: res?.error?.message || 'Something went wrong',
// color: 'red',
// });Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Context: vercel/next.js#68812
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
.editorconfigfile to standardize coding styles across the project.lucide-reactlibrary for better visual representation.Bug Fixes
Removed Features
.prettierignoreand.prettierrcfiles, affecting code formatting exclusions.Documentation