Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Snyk] Upgrade eslint-plugin-import from 2.22.1 to 2.23.3 #210

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[Snyk] Upgrade eslint-plugin-import from 2.22.1 to 2.23.3 #210

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade eslint-plugin-import from 2.22.1 to 2.23.3.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.

  • The recommended version is 4 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 22 days ago, on 2021-05-21.

The recommended version fixes:

Severity Issue PriorityScore (*) Exploit Maturity
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-HOSTEDGITINFO-1088355		 372/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, CVSS 5.3		 Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Release notes
Package name: eslint-plugin-import from eslint-plugin-import GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: eslint-plugin-import

Compare

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@mistaken-pull-closer
Copy link

Thanks for your submission.

It appears that you've created a pull request using one of our repository's branches. Since this is
almost always a mistake, we're going to go ahead and close this. If it was intentional, please
let us know what you were intending and we can see about reopening it.

Thanks again!

@pull-dog
Copy link

pull-dog bot commented Jun 12, 2021

*Ruff* 🐶 I wasn't able to find any Docker Compose files in your repository at any of the given paths in the pull-dog.json configuration file, or the default docker-compose.yml file 😩 Make sure the given paths are correct.

Files checked:

  • docker-compose.yml
What is this?

Pull Dog is a GitHub app that makes test environments for your pull requests using Docker, from a docker-compose.yml file you specify. It takes 19 seconds to set up (we counted!) and there's a free plan available.

Visit our website to learn more.

Commands
  • @pull-dog up to reprovision or provision the server.
  • @pull-dog down to delete the provisioned server.
Troubleshooting

Need help? Don't hesitate to file an issue in our repository

Configuration

{
  "isLazy": false,
  "dockerComposeYmlFilePaths": [
    "docker-compose.yml"
  ],
  "expiry": "00:00:00",
  "conversationMode": "singleComment"
}

Trace ID
185a2100-cbae-11eb-9e4d-943d5d732294

@mistaken-pull-closer mistaken-pull-closer bot added the invalid This doesn't seem right label Jun 12, 2021
@guardrails
Copy link

guardrails bot commented Jun 12, 2021

⚠️ We detected 4 security issues in this pull request:

Mode: paranoid | Total findings: 4 | Considered vulnerability: 4

Vulnerable Libraries (4)
Severity Details
Medium [email protected] upgrade to >4.16.4
Medium [email protected] upgrade to >=5.1.2
High [email protected] upgrade to >=4.17.21
High [email protected] upgrade to >=5.0.5

More info on how to fix Vulnerable Libraries in JavaScript.

👉 Go to the dashboard for detailed results.

📥 Happy? Share your feedback with us.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
invalid This doesn't seem right
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

starWarsIntrospection-test __schema.types confusion
1 participant
@snyk-bot