Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For lasse #123

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from
Closed

For lasse #123

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

thesamesam
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

thesamesam and others added 11 commits June 3, 2024 04:19
Solaris' GCC can't understand that our use is fine, unlike modern compilers:
```
list.c: In function 'print_totals_basic':
list.c:1191:4: error: format not a string literal, argument types not checked [-Werror=format-nonliteral]
  uint64_to_str(totals.files, 0));
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
```

It's presumably because of older gettext missing format attributes.

This is with `gcc (GCC) 7.3.0`.
Inspired by RsyncProject/rsync@3f2a38b.

It runs on Solaris 5.11 via a VirtualBox VM.
xz is already part of oss-fuzz, but oss-fuzz provides & encourages [0]
its 'CIFuzz' service to test individual PRs and commits.

I think it can also run on a schedule but I haven't added that in (yet?)

[0] https://google.github.io/oss-fuzz/getting-started/continuous-integration/
The only non-trivial part here was macOS where 'gcc' is actually Apple Clang
by default, so we have to go out of our way to get GCC from Homebrew, and do
the same for Clang.
This addresses the issue I mentioned in 6c095a9
and speeds up the Valgrind job a bit, because non-xz tools aren't run
unnecessarily with Valgrind by the script tests.
Without "set -e" the job will always be successful.

See vmactions/freebsd-vm#72
There's no real value in doing it via commit for official GH actions. We
can keep using pinned commits for unofficial actions. It's hassle for no
gain.

Maybe going forward we can limit this further by only being paranoid
for the jobs with any access to tokens.
@thesamesam thesamesam closed this Jun 3, 2024
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants