-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For lasse #123
For lasse #123
Conversation
Solaris' GCC can't understand that our use is fine, unlike modern compilers: ``` list.c: In function 'print_totals_basic': list.c:1191:4: error: format not a string literal, argument types not checked [-Werror=format-nonliteral] uint64_to_str(totals.files, 0)); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors ``` It's presumably because of older gettext missing format attributes. This is with `gcc (GCC) 7.3.0`.
Inspired by RsyncProject/rsync@3f2a38b. It runs on Solaris 5.11 via a VirtualBox VM.
xz is already part of oss-fuzz, but oss-fuzz provides & encourages [0] its 'CIFuzz' service to test individual PRs and commits. I think it can also run on a schedule but I haven't added that in (yet?) [0] https://google.github.io/oss-fuzz/getting-started/continuous-integration/
The only non-trivial part here was macOS where 'gcc' is actually Apple Clang by default, so we have to go out of our way to get GCC from Homebrew, and do the same for Clang.
This addresses the issue I mentioned in 6c095a9 and speeds up the Valgrind job a bit, because non-xz tools aren't run unnecessarily with Valgrind by the script tests.
Without "set -e" the job will always be successful. See vmactions/freebsd-vm#72
There's no real value in doing it via commit for official GH actions. We can keep using pinned commits for unofficial actions. It's hassle for no gain. Maybe going forward we can limit this further by only being paranoid for the jobs with any access to tokens.
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
No description provided.