Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(prisma): add useDefineForClassFields option to default ts compilation option #2930

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2024

Conversation

Romakita
Copy link
Collaborator

@Romakita Romakita commented Dec 9, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated configuration options for TypeScript class field definitions.
    • Reformatted code for improved clarity in the project instantiation section.
    • Adjusted test coverage thresholds for Vitest.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the baseCompilerOptions object in the generateCode.ts file, specifically adding the useDefineForClassFields property set to false. Additionally, the formatting of the spread operator in the compilerOptions for the Project instantiation has been adjusted for improved clarity. The core functionality of the generateCode function remains unchanged, and the interface GenerateCodeOptions is noted as updated for completeness, though its signature has not changed. The test configuration in vitest.config.mts has been adjusted by lowering the coverage thresholds for statements and lines.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/orm/prisma/src/generator/generateCode.ts Added useDefineForClassFields: false to baseCompilerOptions and reformatted compilerOptions spread operator for clarity. Updated GenerateCodeOptions interface for completeness.
packages/orm/prisma/vitest.config.mts Decreased coverage thresholds for statements and lines from 91.11 to 91.02; branches and functions thresholds remain unchanged.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GenerateCodeFunction
    participant Project

    User->>GenerateCodeFunction: Call generateCode()
    GenerateCodeFunction->>Project: Instantiate Project with compilerOptions
    Project->>GenerateCodeFunction: Return Project instance
    GenerateCodeFunction->>User: Return generated code
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • fix(prisma): change usr/bin/env ts-node by node #2929: The changes in this PR involve modifications to the generator script, which is closely related to the generateCode.ts file in the main PR, indicating a connection in the context of Prisma's code generation functionality.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Romakita Romakita force-pushed the fix-prisma-compilation-options branch from 7a1ebd6 to 29c0824 Compare December 9, 2024 17:56
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/orm/prisma/src/generator/generateCode.ts (1)

Line range hint 13-19: Consider adding documentation for compiler options

It would be helpful to add a comment explaining why useDefineForClassFields is set to false and its implications for class field behavior.

Here's a suggested addition:

 const baseCompilerOptions: CompilerOptions = {
   target: ScriptTarget.ESNext,
   module: ModuleKind.ESNext,
   emitDecoratorMetadata: true,
   experimentalDecorators: true,
   esModuleInterop: true,
+  // Maintains backward compatibility with traditional class fields behavior
+  // This ensures consistent behavior with decorators and class field initialization
   useDefineForClassFields: false
 };
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a1ebd6 and 29c0824.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/orm/prisma/src/generator/generateCode.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/orm/prisma/vitest.config.mts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/orm/prisma/vitest.config.mts (1)

13-16: Verify the coverage threshold reduction

The coverage thresholds for statements and lines have been reduced by 0.09%. While this is a minor reduction, it would be helpful to understand if this is related to the new useDefineForClassFields compiler option implementation.

Let's check the test coverage changes:

packages/orm/prisma/src/generator/generateCode.ts (2)

35-37: LGTM: Improved code formatting

The conditional spread operator formatting enhances readability without changing functionality.


18-19: LGTM: Added useDefineForClassFields compiler option

Setting useDefineForClassFields to false maintains backward compatibility with the traditional class fields behavior in TypeScript.

Let's verify the impact of this compiler option:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough information about class field usage in the codebase.

Setting useDefineForClassFields to false is appropriate for this codebase

The codebase extensively uses class fields with initializers, particularly in service classes and containers. This compiler option ensures consistent class field behavior across the codebase, especially for:

  • Private fields with # prefix (e.g., #listeners, #providers, #perf)
  • Public fields with initializers (e.g., recipes: Recipe[] = [...])
  • Map initializations (e.g., types: Map<...> = new Map())
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for class field usage that might be affected

# Look for class field declarations
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
  $$$
  $_: $_ = $_
  $$$
}'

# Look for potential decorator usage on class fields
ast-grep --pattern '@$_($$$)
$_: $_'

Length of output: 50355

@Romakita Romakita merged commit 69e7147 into production Dec 9, 2024
12 checks passed
@Romakita Romakita deleted the fix-prisma-compilation-options branch December 9, 2024 18:27
@Romakita
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Romakita commented Dec 9, 2024

🎉 This PR is included in version 8.3.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants