Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update eslint-config-tschaub to version 4.0.0 🚀 #60

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 1, 2016

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello 👋

🚀🚀🚀

eslint-config-tschaub just published its new version 4.0.0, which is not covered by your current version range.

If this pull request passes your tests you can publish your software with the latest version of eslint-config-tschaub – otherwise use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


The new version differs by 9 commits .

  • 45dd2d2 4.0.0
  • acfea74 Merge pull request #9 from tschaub/updates
  • 6262f5c Simpler config organization
  • 8aec9ad Merge pull request #8 from tschaub/greenkeeper-lab-10.0.0
  • d7ea5e3 chore(package): update lab to version 10.0.0
  • 6349d23 Merge pull request #5 from tschaub/greenkeeper-lab-8.3.0
  • 8984912 chore(package): update lab to version 8.3.0
  • 651c9b3 Merge pull request #4 from tschaub/greenkeeper-eslint-2.1.0
  • bdc3b3c chore(package): update eslint to version 2.1.0

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software, up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚡

tschaub added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2016
…-4.0.0

Update eslint-config-tschaub to version 4.0.0 🚀
@tschaub tschaub merged commit f3f7973 into master Mar 1, 2016
@tschaub tschaub deleted the greenkeeper-eslint-config-tschaub-4.0.0 branch March 1, 2016 01:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants