Skip to content

[KERNELS] Fix tmem overflow for fp32 matmul.#9967

Merged
yongjik merged 4 commits into
triton-lang:mainfrom
yongjik:yongjik-260408-fp32
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

[KERNELS] Fix tmem overflow for fp32 matmul.#9967
yongjik merged 4 commits into
triton-lang:mainfrom
yongjik:yongjik-260408-fp32

Conversation

@yongjik
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@yongjik yongjik commented Apr 8, 2026

(Coauthored with Thomas Raoux)

@yongjik yongjik requested a review from ptillet as a code owner April 8, 2026 18:47
Comment thread python/triton_kernels/triton_kernels/matmul_details/opt_flags.py
@yongjik yongjik enabled auto-merge (squash) April 9, 2026 00:02
@yongjik yongjik merged commit 8d4c6cd into triton-lang:main Apr 9, 2026
22 of 27 checks passed
plognjen pushed a commit to plognjen/triton that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2026
exolyr added a commit to intel/intel-xpu-backend-for-triton that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2026
…kiplist

Upstream commit 8d4c6cd ([KERNELS] Fix tmem overflow for fp32 matmul,
triton-lang/triton#9967), merged via PR #6660, added 1 new fp32 test
case to _build_test_op_cases() in test_matmul.py before the swiglu
section. This shifted all swiglu parametrize indices by +1, causing
pytest-skip's --select-fail-on-missing to reject the stale IDs.

Increment each swiglu_optsN by 1 (89→90, 90→91, 93→94, 94→95).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
exolyr added a commit to intel/intel-xpu-backend-for-triton that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2026
…kiplist

Upstream commit 8d4c6cd ([KERNELS] Fix tmem overflow for fp32 matmul,
triton-lang/triton#9967), merged via PR #6660, added 1 new fp32 test
case to _build_test_op_cases() in test_matmul.py before the swiglu
section. This shifted all swiglu parametrize indices by +1, causing
pytest-skip's --select-fail-on-missing to reject the stale IDs.

Increment each swiglu_optsN by 1 (89→90, 90→91, 93→94, 94→95).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants