[Gluon] Expose TMA atomic ops#10040
Merged
Merged
Conversation
tbh, I think this is also the way we should represent this in our IR, but well.
peterbell10
reviewed
Apr 15, 2026
Contributor
peterbell10
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Care to present an argument why this is better?
Contributor
|
Generally my preference is for operations that do a narowly scoped thing, over bloated interfaces with lots of flags |
peterbell10
approved these changes
Apr 15, 2026
Contributor
peterbell10
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM other than a small NIT
raymondtay
pushed a commit
to raymondtay/triton
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2026
tbh, I think this is also the way we should represent this in our IR. I will add an end-to-end test once triton-lang#9977 is merged (I will extend the test in that PR to test this op)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
tbh, I think this is also the way we should represent this in our IR.
I will add an end-to-end test once #9977 is merged (I will extend the test in that PR to test this op)