Skip to content

Conversation

@findinpath
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Documents the settings from the https://github.com/trinodb/trino/blob/29ffc6c1c7d93bbd22ccdccb98ba39a5fab1fd68/plugin/trino-bigquery/src/main/java/io/trino/plugin/bigquery/BigQueryRpcConfig.java config class.

Additional context and related issues

Release notes

( ) This is not user-visible or is docs only, and no release notes are required.
( ) Release notes are required. Please propose a release note for me.
( ) Release notes are required, with the following suggested text:

## Section
* Fix some things. ({issue}`issuenumber`)

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Jan 7, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the docs label Jan 7, 2025
@findinpath findinpath requested review from ebyhr and pajaks January 7, 2025 11:57
@ebyhr
Copy link
Member

ebyhr commented Jan 7, 2025

I think we should remove @ConfigHidden annotation from BigQueryRpcConfig if we document these properties.
cc: @wendigo

@findinpath
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think we should remove @ConfigHidden annotation from BigQueryRpcConfig if we document these properties.

Yes, waiting feedback from your side @ebyhr on whether we should do this before proceeding with this PR.

mosabua
mosabua previously requested changes Jan 7, 2025
@findinpath findinpath force-pushed the findinpath/docs-bigquery-rpc branch from 095ec74 to cef9db1 Compare January 13, 2025 21:30
@github-actions github-actions bot added the bigquery BigQuery connector label Jan 13, 2025
@findinpath findinpath requested a review from mosabua January 13, 2025 21:32
@findinpath findinpath force-pushed the findinpath/docs-bigquery-rpc branch from 3d05c8d to 1ebd9b4 Compare January 13, 2025 21:32
Copy link
Member

@mosabua mosabua left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From a docs perspective this is fine by me now. Not so sure about unhiding the properties, but if we document as in this PR .. it makes sense to me. @ebyhr @martint or others can make that call

@ebyhr ebyhr merged commit 9b53b3d into trinodb:master Jan 13, 2025
20 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 469 milestone Jan 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants