Conversation
mosabua
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ideally we merge the replacement Alluxio caching PR first .. but I am also fine merging this now. At minimum however we need to also remove the documentation.
d645430 to
7719227
Compare
|
@mosabua Rubix and Alluxio are unpatched and unmaintained dependencies that have high score CVEs. Rubix doesn't work so keeping it doesn't bring any value other than false impression that hive caching is actually supported. Yeah, I'd love to see new Alluxio land as it has a higher chance of being maintained, supported and actually working. |
7719227 to
4c6dce2
Compare
b4b33bd to
ab9db53
Compare
|
Thank you! |
|
Imho we should merge - provided the CI failures are false alarms. |
|
We’re going to merge it after the Alluxio changes get in. |
|
Sounds good @martint - once we have coverage with Alluxio caching for Delta Lake from the current PR or once we have it also for Hive? |
ab9db53 to
3635e6a
Compare
|
Rebased. |
3635e6a to
711690b
Compare
711690b to
9214876
Compare
|
Rebased |
Rubix was abandoned 3 years ago, it's broken in majority of production cases with frequent cluster crashes, it has number of high impact CVEs and we are planning to replace it with Alluxio caching. Keeping Rubix in its current form brings more harm than good.
9214876 to
b1a4e5f
Compare
Rubix was abandoned 3 years ago, it's broken in majority of production cases with frequent cluster crashes, it has number of high impact CVEs and we are planning to replace it with Alluxio caching. Keeping Rubix in its current form brings more harm than good.
Description
Additional context and related issues
Release notes
( ) This is not user-visible or is docs only, and no release notes are required.
( ) Release notes are required. Please propose a release note for me.
(x) Release notes are required, with the following suggested text: