Skip to content

Fix javadoc in OptimizeMixedDistinctAggregations#14213

Merged
sopel39 merged 1 commit intotrinodb:masterfrom
starburstdata:ks/fix_comment
Sep 23, 2022
Merged

Fix javadoc in OptimizeMixedDistinctAggregations#14213
sopel39 merged 1 commit intotrinodb:masterfrom
starburstdata:ks/fix_comment

Conversation

@sopel39
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@sopel39 sopel39 commented Sep 20, 2022

Javadoc suggests that there are 3 aggregations involved. However, there are only 2 aggregations and GroupId operator.

Description

Non-technical explanation

Release notes

( ) This is not user-visible or docs only and no release notes are required.
( ) Release notes are required, please propose a release note for me.
( ) Release notes are required, with the following suggested text:

# Section
* Fix some things. ({issue}`issuenumber`)

@sopel39 sopel39 requested a review from martint September 20, 2022 11:07
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Sep 20, 2022
@sopel39 sopel39 force-pushed the ks/fix_comment branch 2 times, most recently from 6077922 to d8f1635 Compare September 20, 2022 11:09
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@martint martint left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update the commit message to say "seems to indicate there are three GROUP BY ..." instead of "aggregations". That confused me for a while as I misinterpreted as "aggregation functions".

Javadoc seems to indicate there are three GROUP BY involved.
However, there are only two GROUP BYs and GroupId operator.
@sopel39 sopel39 merged commit 8dd03b8 into trinodb:master Sep 23, 2022
@sopel39 sopel39 deleted the ks/fix_comment branch September 23, 2022 10:09
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 398 milestone Sep 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants