-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
Fix reading Iceberg $manifests table when contains_nan is NULL #11241
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Optional may be handy here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking now also about something similar. A similar change would be beneficial for unboxing other types as well.
Alternatively this could be handled behind the scenes within BOOLEAN if we pass Boolean instead of boolean
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd love to avoid nullable reference types where possible. Quite easy to miss.
The writer being "smarter" means it's easy to introduce mistakes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi all
The field is nullable per the spec. It's generally only missing for older data files, so it's usually encountered (and why it's not super reproducible). But it is nullable per the spec. Older tables won't have this field populated and so that is a source of issue.
It is easy to encounter NPEs in my opinion so I typically prefer to handle things with optionals, but it is usually present (if that informs your thinking at all for performance etc) 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For reference, here is the equivalent code for the scan in Spark: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/68091037944ff7e9de91e7b619f313a8e98c1adc/core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/ManifestsTable.java#L102-L123
Note that the column is nullable: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/68091037944ff7e9de91e7b619f313a8e98c1adc/core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/ManifestsTable.java#L41