Conversation
f0b8adc to
26a50c8
Compare
d049a32 to
007ea0c
Compare
501e7e8 to
0b32fb3
Compare
|
Instead of introducing a bloated and controversial PR template, can we have a lean one, that we agree about? Iterate. |
|
Here is a live PR that used the template already manually - #10898 |
i read there
This is a good example why we shouldn't ask contributors for release notes. in that PR, a contributor didn't now the release notes need to present the change from user perspective. |
|
Everyone please keep in mind that this is all just a template .. there is no enforcement to use it. |
8be2d7c to
57f6cb5
Compare
dain
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is good enough to try out. If we don't like it, we can always remove it.
|
@dain and myself found some issues with the checkbox syntax interfering with GHA .. should be all fixed now |
martint
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Agreed. This is a good start! Once we see how people end up using it in practice, we can adjust it.
As agreed with @martint here is a first draft. This is aimed to improve release process and contributions to be scoped better, and to make the relevant information more easily available.
Open to any feedback for improvements/adjustments.