-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
output: remove: catch FileNotFoundError #9574
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We've discussed this before, but it loks wrong. E.g. imagine a directory with files as an output, this will error-out (at least unless I'm missing something). Could you elaborate on the problem that you are trying to solve, please?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's what the test tries to cover unless I'm misunderstanding you, but we probably do need to test it across other filesystems.
The problem is in #8757 - the recursive call errors out for a nonexistent path in s3fs.
As mentioned above, I don't mind closing if we come up with a different approach to solve it in s3fs or fsspec, but wanted to open it for discussion as a potential quick fix.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you are spot on in your explanation in the issue. localfs is ignoring that flag (looks like our oversight) and since all other filesystems would also raise FileNotFoundError, we should just catch and ignore FileNotFoundError here as well.
The test you've added could be removed or kept around. Ideally, we would test external outputs in
dvc.testing, but that will probably just have to wait for better times.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test will become relevant once we make our localfs comply with the flag, but IIRC there are a few more places that need to be fixed along the way, so that could wait.