Graphql cost analysis, mainly to limit query execution in graphql service before resolvers are executed.
- Query cost calculation based on schema and cost mappings
- Cost directive for the schema
- Cost directive extraction from the schema
- Cost directive value extraction from the schema as cost mappings
In the API documentation, @pipedrive/graphql-query-cost is referred to as queryCost
, as if it was imported with:
const queryCost = require('@pipedrive/graphql-query-cost');
A custom graphql directive for defining expenses directly in the schema.
const schema = `
${queryCost.costDirective}
type Greeting {
id: ID
name: String
}
type Query {
hello(limit: Int!): Greeting @cost(
complexity: 10,
network: 1,
db: 1,
useMultiplers: true,
multipliers: ["limit"]
provides: ["id"]
)
}
`;
Parameter | Type | Description | Complexity | Tokens |
---|---|---|---|---|
complexity | Int | Abstract value | n * 1 | |
network | Int | Amount of requests required to resolve the field | n * 100 | |
db | Int | Amount of db requests or query complexity | n * 100 | |
mutlipliers | [String] | Field arguments for multipling the complexity | ||
useMultipliers | Boolean | When defined, field complexity will not be multiplied. Defaults to true unless the directive is not defined. |
||
provides | [String] | Specify which fields are available for the child on the parent type. If only those are requested, cost will be ignored. |
Returns cost directive arguments per type definition.
const schema = `
${queryCost.costDirective}
type Greeting {
id: ID
name: String @cost(db: 10)
}
type Query {
hello: Greeting @cost(complexity: 10)
}
`;
const { costMap } = queryCost.extractCost(schema);
// {
// Query: {
// hello: {
// complexity: 10,
// },
// },
// Greeting: {
// hello: {
// tokens: 1000, // n * 100
// },
// },
// };
Calculates cost of the current query based on cost mappings and schema.
const schema = `
type Query {
hello(limit: Int!): string
world: string
}
`
const query = `
query makeQuery($limit) {
hello(limit: $limit)
world
}
`
const costMap = {
Query: {
hello: {
complexity: 5
multipliers: ['limit']
}
}
}
const cost = queryCost.calculateCost(
query, schema, {
costMap,
defaultCost: 1,
variables: {
$limit: 5
}
}
)
// (5 * 5) + 1 = 11
- Definition of cost for entity/resolver/property should be pessimistic (considered for worst case scenario, cold cache)
- Complexity argument is multiplied by its own multipliers and every parent mutliplier.
deals(limit: 100) @cost(complexity: 2) = 200
- Tokens define how many resources are need to resolve a field. When it's recursive it is multiplied.
- Tokens are only multiplied only by its parents multipliers. Only parent multipliers are used because it takes "parent" times resources to execute the query.
Example queryExample token costdeals(limit: 100) @cost(complexity: 2, db: 1, network: 1)
If tokens were multiplied by own multiplercomplexity(2) * limit(100) + tokens(200) = 400
complexity(200) + tokens(200) * limit(100) = 20200
# Schema
type Query {
field: String @cost(complexity: 3)
default: String
}
# Query
query {
field
default
}
Total cost is 4:
- field cost is 3
- default cost is 1
- Multipliers are recursive
- Undefined(
Parent.name
) complexity is not multiplied
# Schema
type Query {
parents(limit: Int!, names: [String]): [Parent]
@cost(complexity: 3, multipliers: ["limit", "names"])
}
type Parent {
name: String
children(limit: Int): [Child] @cost(complexity: 5)
}
type Child {
name: String
}
# Query
{
parents(limit: 2, names: ["elon", "foo"]) {
name
children(limit: 4) {
name
}
}
}
Field path | Description | Result |
---|---|---|
parents | limit _ names.length _ complexity | 2 _ 2 _ 3 = 12 |
parents.name | default | previous + 1 = 13 |
parents.children | (parents.limit _ parents.names.length) _ children.limit * complexity | previous + (2 _ 2 _ 4 * 5) = 93 |
parents.children.name | default | previous + 1 = 94 |
- Definining
useMultipliers: false
ignores the multipliers
# Schema
type Query {
parents(limit: Int): [Parent] @cost(complexity: 2, multipliers: ["limit"])
}
type Parent {
name: String @cost(complexity: 8, useMultipliers: false)
}
# Query
{
parents(limit: 5) {
name
}
}
Field path | Description | Result |
---|---|---|
parents | limit * complexity | c(2) * limit(5) = 10 |
parents.name | useMultipliers: false is defined | previous + c(8) = 18 |
- If all the queried fields are in the list of
provides
argument, then the complexity of the field is ignored and the default cost is applied
# Schema
type Query {
parents(limit: Int): [Parent] @cost(complexity: 3, multipliers: ["limit"], provides: ["id"])
}
type Parent {
id: ID @cost(complexity: 1)
name: String
}
# Query
{
parents(limit: 5) {
id
}
}
Field path | Description | Result |
---|---|---|
parents | limit * complexity | c(3) * limit(5) = 15 |
parents.id | no multipliers used, default cost applied - field parents already provides fields ["id"] |
previous + c(1) = 16 |
# Schema
type Query {
pipelines: [Pipeline]
}
type Pipeline {
id: ID
deals: [Deal]
}
type Deal {
id: ID
pipeline: Pipeline
}
# Query
{
pipelines {
deals {
pipeline {
deals {
pipeline {
id
}
}
}
}
}
}
Field path | Description | Result |
---|---|---|
pipelines | Default cost | 1 |
deals | Default cost | previous + 1 = 2 |
pipeline | Default cost | previous + 1 = 3 |
deals | deals.pipeline reverse of pipeline.deals already appeared Recursion level 1 |
previous * 100(recursion x1) + 1 = 301 |
pipeline | Recursion level increased to 2 | previous _ (100 _ 100)(recursion x2) + 1 = 301 * 10000 + 1 = 3010001 |
id | Default cost | (previous + 1) = 3010002 |
recursionMultiplier
default value is 100
. If recursion is detected, thats how much cost gets affected.
recursionMultiplier
value of 1
will mean that detected recursion doesn't affect cost.
recursionMultiplier
value gets inherited to deeper levels of the graph, so you can have different values depending on the schema
For cases where schema and resolver can have deeply nested recursive structures (trees or graphs) fetched once into memory,
you can override default behaviour by setting recursionMultiplier
to lower values.
With maximum cost of 5000
per request, you can see different values of recursionMultiplier
affects graphq and schema below:
recursionMultiplier | Cost |
---|---|
1 | 6 |
3 | 1490 |
3.65 | 4783 |
100 (default) | 2000001000102 |
- It is recommended that you don't set recursion to
1
, but still leave some recursion scaling limits, such that your query still fits into max cost limit.
# Schema
type Query {
myTree: [TreeLeaf]
}
type TreeLeaf {
id: ID
leafs: [TreeLeaf] @cost(recursionMultiplier: 1)
}
# Query
{
myTree {
leafs {
leafs {
leafs {
leafs {
id
}
}
}
}
}
}
- With great
recursionMultiplier
override power comes great responsibility that you don't reset it to1
and leave holes in graph cost map.
type Query {
myTree: [TreeLeaf]
}
type TreeLeaf {
id: ID
# reset recursionMultiplier back to 100, as its part of the recursive graph
branch: Branch @cost(recursionMultiplier: 100)
leafs: [TreeLeaf] @cost(recursionMultiplier: 1)
}
type Branch {
id: ID
name: String @cost(network: 1)
leafs: [TreeLeaf]
}
To ease understanding how cost is calculated, you can use debug:true
param, which will console.log node visiting along with how price is added.
(Maybe it could be a product feature later if further )
calculateCost(`query { a { b { c { b {c { id }}}}}}`, typeDefs, { costMap, debug: true });
Debug result:
undefined (<OperationDefinition>)
a <Field>
a (<Field>)
b <Field>
b (<Field>)
c <Field>
c (<Field>)
b <Field>
b (<Field>)
c <Field>
recursion detected b=>c for 1 times
recursion detected c=>bfor 1 times
* recursion multiplier = (10000)
c (<Field>)
id <Field>
= 1
== 1
= 20000
== 20000
= 20001
== 20001
= 20002
== 20002
= 20003
== 20003
= 20004
== 20004
- Before making PR, make sure to run
npm run version
& fill CHANGELOG npm-version-<version>
– should be set when creating a pull request. It’s good to set it as soon as possible, so reviewer can validate that the proposed version bump is correctnpm-ready-for-publish
– add this label after PR has been approved, it will publish the package to NPM and merge changes to master
Original author - @ErikSchults. Current maintainers - @tot-ra, @Wolg. Mention in PR, if it is stuck
See blog post