-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge pull request #1 from torvalds/master #146
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Update linux Repository
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2015
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 1, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 15, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 28, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 4, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 22, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
0day-ci
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2016
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#99: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2965: + * zone list (with a backoff mechanism which is a function of no_progress_loops). WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#129: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:2995: + * Keep reclaiming pages while there is a chance this will lead somewhere. WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#134: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3000: + for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask) { WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#138: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3004: + available -= DIV_ROUND_UP(no_progress_loops * available, MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES); WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#142: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3008: + * Would the allocation succeed if we reclaimed the whole available? WARNING: line over 80 characters torvalds#146: FILE: mm/page_alloc.c:3012: + /* Wait for some write requests to complete then retry */ total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 202 lines checked ./patches/mm-oom-rework-oom-detection.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hillf Danton <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
laijs
pushed a commit
to laijs/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2017
…move lkl: return 0 in lkl_netdevs_remove in tools/lkl/lib/nt-host.c
wzyy2
pushed a commit
to wzyy2/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 11, 2017
drm mm is not initial on non-iommu context. Fix crash: [ 11.635376] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 [ 11.636148] pgd = ffffffc0de19d000 [ 11.636474] [00000000] *pgd=0000000000000000, *pud=0000000000000000 [ 11.637088] Internal error: Oops: 96000045 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 11.637594] Modules linked in: [ 11.637902] CPU: 4 PID: 424 Comm: sh Not tainted 4.4.71 torvalds#146 [ 11.638406] Hardware name: Rockchip RK3399 Evaluation Board v3 (Android) (DT) [ 11.639050] task: ffffffc0de796800 ti: ffffffc0de260000 task.ti: ffffffc0de260000 [ 11.639736] PC is at __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xa8/0x178 [ 11.640198] LR is at __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x7c/0x178 [ 11.788003] [<ffffff8008b85b5c>] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xa8/0x178 [ 11.788560] [<ffffff8008b85c58>] mutex_lock+0x2c/0x44 [ 11.789024] [<ffffff800849e8d8>] rockchip_drm_mm_dump+0x30/0x5c [ 11.789560] [<ffffff80081d612c>] seq_read+0x1a8/0x3f8 [ 11.790017] [<ffffff80081b4208>] __vfs_read+0x38/0xf4 [ 11.790472] [<ffffff80081b4adc>] vfs_read+0x84/0x128 [ 11.790927] [<ffffff80081b552c>] SyS_read+0x54/0xa4 [ 11.791372] [<ffffff80080828b0>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28 Change-Id: I342311da43d50b743257b81425dfc6a327306803 Signed-off-by: Mark Yao <[email protected]>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#132: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:132: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#133: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:133: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bWifiOnly); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#134: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:134: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#135: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:135: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#136: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:136: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#137: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:137: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#138: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:138: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#139: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:139: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#140: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:140: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#142: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:142: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#144: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:144: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#145: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:145: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#146: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:146: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#147: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:147: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_DisplayCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <[email protected]>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 16, 2021
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#132: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:132: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#133: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:133: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bWifiOnly); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#134: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:134: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#135: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:135: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#136: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:136: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#137: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:137: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#138: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:138: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#139: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:139: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#140: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:140: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#142: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:142: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#144: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:144: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#145: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:145: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#146: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:146: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#147: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b2Ant.h:147: +void EXhalbtc8723b2ant_DisplayCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist); Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
akiernan
pushed a commit
to zuma-array/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2022
PD#150078: driver defect clean up: torvalds#14 torvalds#89 torvalds#111 torvalds#124 torvalds#133 torvalds#136 torvalds#137 torvalds#146 torvalds#148 torvalds#150 torvalds#153 Change-Id: I734a66a8b92a0dc57a232879463a3fc074534fa0 Signed-off-by: Zongdong Jiao <[email protected]>
akiernan
pushed a commit
to zuma-array/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2022
PD#150078: driver defect clean up: torvalds#14 torvalds#89 torvalds#111 torvalds#124 torvalds#133 torvalds#136 torvalds#137 torvalds#146 torvalds#148 torvalds#150 torvalds#153 Change-Id: I734a66a8b92a0dc57a232879463a3fc074534fa0 Signed-off-by: Zongdong Jiao <[email protected]>
mj22226
pushed a commit
to mj22226/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2023
Associate the mac address with the board. Signed-off-by: Stephen Chen <[email protected]>
rpardini
pushed a commit
to rpardini/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2024
* arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: add power led and user led Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: modify vbus5v0_typec enable gpio Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: add pwm-fan node Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: modify bt gpio pinctrl Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: modify dp sound card name Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock5 itx: remove useless node Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock5 itx: add hdmi0_phy_pll Fix dp0 display abnormality when hdmi1 and dp0 are displayed at the same time. Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: modify hp_det pinctrl pull down Since F_AUDIO's headphones don't have a detect pin, force the detect pin low. Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock5itx: enable vdd_0v75_s0 when suspend Fix automatic wakeup after suspend. Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2024
The memory_tier_init() acquires unnecessary memory_tier_lock and its locking scope includes the memory notifier registration of hotplug callback, which also acqures the memory_tier_lock. This can trigger an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Specifically, If the memory online event occurs, the executing memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because the memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <[email protected]>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2024
memory_tier_init() acquires unnecessary memory_tier_lock and its locking scope includes the memory notifier registration of hotplug callback, which also acqures the memory_tier_lock. This can trigger an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Specifically, If the memory online event occurs, the executing memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because the memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <[email protected]> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2024
memory_tier_init() acquires unnecessary memory_tier_lock and its locking scope includes the memory notifier registration of hotplug callback, which also acqures the memory_tier_lock. This can trigger an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Specifically, If the memory online event occurs, the executing memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because the memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <[email protected]> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 28, 2024
memory_tier_init() acquires unnecessary memory_tier_lock and its locking scope includes the memory notifier registration of hotplug callback, which also acqures the memory_tier_lock. This can trigger an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Specifically, If the memory online event occurs, the executing memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because the memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <[email protected]> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2024
commit 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") introduces a locking change that use guard(mutex) to instead of mutex_lock/unlock() for memory_tier_lock. It unexpectedly expanded the locked region to include the hotplug_memory_notifier(), as a result, it triggers an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Exclude hotplug_memory_notifier() from the locked region to fixing it. The deadlock scenario is that when a memory online event occurs, the execution of memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because the memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <[email protected]>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2024
commit 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") introduces a locking change that use guard(mutex) to instead of mutex_lock/unlock() for memory_tier_lock. It unexpectedly expanded the locked region to include the hotplug_memory_notifier(), as a result, it triggers an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Exclude hotplug_memory_notifier() from the locked region to fixing it. The deadlock scenario is that when a memory online event occurs, the execution of memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <[email protected]> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <[email protected]> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2024
commit 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") introduces a locking change that use guard(mutex) to instead of mutex_lock/unlock() for memory_tier_lock. It unexpectedly expanded the locked region to include the hotplug_memory_notifier(), as a result, it triggers an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Exclude hotplug_memory_notifier() from the locked region to fixing it. The deadlock scenario is that when a memory online event occurs, the execution of memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <[email protected]> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2024
commit 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") introduces a locking change that use guard(mutex) to instead of mutex_lock/unlock() for memory_tier_lock. It unexpectedly expanded the locked region to include the hotplug_memory_notifier(), as a result, it triggers an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Exclude hotplug_memory_notifier() from the locked region to fixing it. The deadlock scenario is that when a memory online event occurs, the execution of memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <[email protected]> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2024
commit 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") introduces a locking change that use guard(mutex) to instead of mutex_lock/unlock() for memory_tier_lock. It unexpectedly expanded the locked region to include the hotplug_memory_notifier(), as a result, it triggers an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Exclude hotplug_memory_notifier() from the locked region to fixing it. The deadlock scenario is that when a memory online event occurs, the execution of memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <[email protected]> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
ioworker0
pushed a commit
to ioworker0/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 4, 2024
commit 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") introduces a locking change that use guard(mutex) to instead of mutex_lock/unlock() for memory_tier_lock. It unexpectedly expanded the locked region to include the hotplug_memory_notifier(), as a result, it triggers an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. Exclude hotplug_memory_notifier() from the locked region to fixing it. The deadlock scenario is that when a memory online event occurs, the execution of memory notifier will access the read lock of the memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while holding memory_tier_lock. Then the memory online event continues to invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock occurs. In fact, this deadlock can't happen because memory_tier_init() always executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall() has an higher priority than module_init(). [ 133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 Tainted: G O N [ 133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock: [ 133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.536449] [ 133.536449] but task is already holding lock: [ 133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.556781] [ 133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 133.556781] [ 133.569957] [ 133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 133.577618] [ 133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 133.584997] down_write+0x97/0x210 [ 133.588647] blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0 [ 133.592537] register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30 [ 133.596314] memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300 [ 133.599864] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.603399] kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0 [ 133.606986] kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0 [ 133.610312] ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90 [ 133.613652] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 133.617012] [ 133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 133.623390] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.626730] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.629757] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.632731] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.635717] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.638748] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.641647] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.644636] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.647427] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.650246] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.653107] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.655831] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.658616] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.661419] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.664202] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.667060] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.669949] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.672687] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.675463] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.678493] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.681366] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.684149] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.686937] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.689673] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.692421] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.695118] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.697910] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.700794] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.703455] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 133.706054] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 133.708602] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 133.711234] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 133.713937] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 133.716492] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 133.719053] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 133.721537] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 133.724239] [ 133.724239] other info that might help us debug this: [ 133.724239] [ 133.730832] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 133.730832] [ 133.735298] CPU0 CPU1 [ 133.737759] ---- ---- [ 133.740165] rlock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.742623] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.745357] lock((memory_chain).rwsem); [ 133.748141] lock(memory_tier_lock); [ 133.750489] [ 133.750489] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 133.750489] [ 133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133: [ 133.759179] #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570 [ 133.762299] #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30 [ 133.765565] #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0 [ 133.768978] #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30 [ 133.772312] #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30 [ 133.775544] #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0 [ 133.779113] [ 133.779113] stack backtrace: [ 133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G O N 6.11.0-rc2+ torvalds#146 [ 133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST [ 133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 [ 133.793291] Call Trace: [ 133.795826] <TASK> [ 133.798284] dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150 [ 133.801025] dump_stack+0x19/0x20 [ 133.803609] print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740 [ 133.806341] check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0 [ 133.809056] ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 [ 133.811866] ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.814670] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.817610] __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60 [ 133.820339] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.823128] ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.825926] ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.828648] lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580 [ 133.831349] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.834293] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.837134] __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490 [ 133.839829] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.842753] ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.845602] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 133.848438] ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 [ 133.851200] ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 133.853935] ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160 [ 133.856699] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0 [ 133.859564] mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.862251] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30 [ 133.864964] memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0 [ 133.867752] notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370 [ 133.870550] ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160 [ 133.873372] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0 [ 133.876311] memory_notify+0x2e/0x40 [ 133.879013] online_pages+0x597/0x720 [ 133.881686] ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0 [ 133.884397] ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10 [ 133.887244] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 133.890299] ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0 [ 133.893203] memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0 [ 133.896099] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.899039] ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0 [ 133.901667] ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10 [ 133.904366] ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10 [ 133.907218] device_online+0x141/0x1d0 [ 133.909845] online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60 [ 133.912494] walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120 [ 133.915104] ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10 [ 133.917776] add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0 [ 133.920404] ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10 [ 133.923104] ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.925781] ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180 [ 133.928450] add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180 [ 133.931036] dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem] [ 133.933665] ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.936332] ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10 [ 133.938878] dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230 [ 133.941332] ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10 [ 133.943954] really_probe+0x27f/0xac0 [ 133.946387] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30 [ 133.949106] __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460 [ 133.951704] ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190 [ 133.954241] driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0 [ 133.956749] __driver_attach+0x277/0x570 [ 133.959228] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10 [ 133.961776] bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0 [ 133.964367] ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10 [ 133.967019] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 133.969543] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60 [ 133.972132] driver_attach+0x49/0x60 [ 133.974536] bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0 [ 133.977044] driver_register+0x170/0x4b0 [ 133.979480] __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0 [ 133.982126] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.984724] dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem] [ 133.987284] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 133.989965] do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0 [ 133.992506] ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10 [ 133.995185] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0 [ 133.997748] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.000288] ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60 [ 134.002762] ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60 [ 134.005202] ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80 [ 134.007753] ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem] [ 134.010439] do_init_module+0x277/0x750 [ 134.012953] load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0 [ 134.015406] ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.017887] ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.020470] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30 [ 134.023127] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.025767] ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0 [ 134.028429] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.031162] ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820 [ 134.033645] ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.036232] ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 [ 134.038766] init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.041291] ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0 [ 134.043936] ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10 [ 134.046516] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30 [ 134.049091] ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20 [ 134.051551] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210 [ 134.054077] idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690 [ 134.056643] ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10 [ 134.059318] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20 [ 134.061995] ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210 [ 134.064428] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0 [ 134.066976] x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0 [ 134.069405] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 [ 134.071926] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [[email protected]: add mutex_lock/unlock() pair back] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 823430c ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers") Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]> Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <[email protected]> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
hbiyik
pushed a commit
to hbiyik/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2024
* arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: add power led and user led Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: modify vbus5v0_typec enable gpio Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: add pwm-fan node Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: modify bt gpio pinctrl Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: modify dp sound card name Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock5 itx: remove useless node Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock5 itx: add hdmi0_phy_pll Fix dp0 display abnormality when hdmi1 and dp0 are displayed at the same time. Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock 5 itx: modify hp_det pinctrl pull down Since F_AUDIO's headphones don't have a detect pin, force the detect pin low. Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> * arm64: dts: rock5itx: enable vdd_0v75_s0 when suspend Fix automatic wakeup after suspend. Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Ken Wang <[email protected]>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2024
With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [ 5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [ 5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [ 5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b torvalds#146 [ 5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [ 5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.604303] <TASK> [ 5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [ 5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [ 5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [ 5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [ 5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [ 5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [ 5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [ 5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [ 5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [ 5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [ 5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproduer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb > /dev/null mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The root cause of this issue is as follows: When simple quota is enabled, the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag is set after btrfs_commit_transaction(), whereas the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE flag is set before btrfs_commit_transaction(), which led to the first flag not being flushed to disk, and the second flag is successfully flushed. Finally causes this assertion failure after umount && mount again. To resolve this issue, the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag is set immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction. Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <[email protected]>
adam900710
pushed a commit
to adam900710/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2024
set squota incompat bit before committing the transaction that enables the feature With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [ 5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [ 5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [ 5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b torvalds#146 [ 5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [ 5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.604303] <TASK> [ 5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [ 5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [ 5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [ 5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [ 5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [ 5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [ 5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [ 5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [ 5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [ 5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [ 5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproduer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb > /dev/null mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The issue is that when enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), we set BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE at fs_info->qgroup_flags and persist it in the quota root in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY, but we only set the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA after we commit the transaction used to enable simple quotas. This means that if after that transaction commit we unmount the filesystem without starting and committing any other transaction, or we have a power failure, the next time we mount the filesystem we will find the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE set in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY but we will not find the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA set in the superblock, triggering an assertion failure at: btrfs_read_qgroup_config() -> qgroup_read_enable_gen() To fix this issue, set the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction. Fixes: 182940f ("btrfs: qgroup: add new quota mode for simple quotas") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
to kdave/btrfs-devel
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2024
set squota incompat bit before committing the transaction that enables the feature With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [ 5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [ 5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [ 5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b torvalds#146 [ 5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [ 5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.604303] <TASK> [ 5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [ 5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [ 5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [ 5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [ 5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [ 5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [ 5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [ 5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [ 5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [ 5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [ 5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproduer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb > /dev/null mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The issue is that when enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), we set BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE at fs_info->qgroup_flags and persist it in the quota root in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY, but we only set the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA after we commit the transaction used to enable simple quotas. This means that if after that transaction commit we unmount the filesystem without starting and committing any other transaction, or we have a power failure, the next time we mount the filesystem we will find the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE set in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY but we will not find the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA set in the superblock, triggering an assertion failure at: btrfs_read_qgroup_config() -> qgroup_read_enable_gen() To fix this issue, set the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction. Fixes: 182940f ("btrfs: qgroup: add new quota mode for simple quotas") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
morbidrsa
pushed a commit
to morbidrsa/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2024
set squota incompat bit before committing the transaction that enables the feature With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [ 5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [ 5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [ 5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b torvalds#146 [ 5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [ 5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.604303] <TASK> [ 5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [ 5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [ 5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [ 5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [ 5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [ 5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [ 5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [ 5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [ 5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [ 5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [ 5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproduer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb > /dev/null mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The issue is that when enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), we set BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE at fs_info->qgroup_flags and persist it in the quota root in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY, but we only set the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA after we commit the transaction used to enable simple quotas. This means that if after that transaction commit we unmount the filesystem without starting and committing any other transaction, or we have a power failure, the next time we mount the filesystem we will find the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE set in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY but we will not find the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA set in the superblock, triggering an assertion failure at: btrfs_read_qgroup_config() -> qgroup_read_enable_gen() To fix this issue, set the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction. Fixes: 182940f ("btrfs: qgroup: add new quota mode for simple quotas") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
to kdave/btrfs-devel
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2024
set squota incompat bit before committing the transaction that enables the feature With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [ 5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [ 5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [ 5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b torvalds#146 [ 5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [ 5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.604303] <TASK> [ 5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [ 5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [ 5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [ 5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [ 5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [ 5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [ 5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [ 5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [ 5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [ 5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [ 5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [ 5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproduer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb > /dev/null mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The issue is that when enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), we set BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE at fs_info->qgroup_flags and persist it in the quota root in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY, but we only set the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA after we commit the transaction used to enable simple quotas. This means that if after that transaction commit we unmount the filesystem without starting and committing any other transaction, or we have a power failure, the next time we mount the filesystem we will find the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE set in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY but we will not find the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA set in the superblock, triggering an assertion failure at: btrfs_read_qgroup_config() -> qgroup_read_enable_gen() To fix this issue, set the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction. Fixes: 182940f ("btrfs: qgroup: add new quota mode for simple quotas") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
to kdave/btrfs-devel
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2024
Set squota incompat bit before committing the transaction that enables the feature. With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b torvalds#146 [5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.604303] <TASK> [5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproducer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -q -f /dev/sdb mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The issue is that when enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), we set BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE at fs_info->qgroup_flags and persist it in the quota root in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY, but we only set the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA after we commit the transaction used to enable simple quotas. This means that if after that transaction commit we unmount the filesystem without starting and committing any other transaction, or we have a power failure, the next time we mount the filesystem we will find the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE set in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY but we will not find the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA set in the superblock, triggering an assertion failure at: btrfs_read_qgroup_config() -> qgroup_read_enable_gen() To fix this issue, set the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction. Fixes: 182940f ("btrfs: qgroup: add new quota mode for simple quotas") CC: [email protected] # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
to kdave/btrfs-devel
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2024
Set squota incompat bit before committing the transaction that enables the feature. With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b torvalds#146 [5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.604303] <TASK> [5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproducer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -q -f /dev/sdb mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The issue is that when enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), we set BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE at fs_info->qgroup_flags and persist it in the quota root in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY, but we only set the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA after we commit the transaction used to enable simple quotas. This means that if after that transaction commit we unmount the filesystem without starting and committing any other transaction, or we have a power failure, the next time we mount the filesystem we will find the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE set in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY but we will not find the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA set in the superblock, triggering an assertion failure at: btrfs_read_qgroup_config() -> qgroup_read_enable_gen() To fix this issue, set the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction. Fixes: 182940f ("btrfs: qgroup: add new quota mode for simple quotas") CC: [email protected] # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
to kdave/btrfs-devel
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2024
Set squota incompat bit before committing the transaction that enables the feature. With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b torvalds#146 [5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.604303] <TASK> [5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproducer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -q -f /dev/sdb mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The issue is that when enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), we set BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE at fs_info->qgroup_flags and persist it in the quota root in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY, but we only set the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA after we commit the transaction used to enable simple quotas. This means that if after that transaction commit we unmount the filesystem without starting and committing any other transaction, or we have a power failure, the next time we mount the filesystem we will find the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE set in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY but we will not find the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA set in the superblock, triggering an assertion failure at: btrfs_read_qgroup_config() -> qgroup_read_enable_gen() To fix this issue, set the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction. Fixes: 182940f ("btrfs: qgroup: add new quota mode for simple quotas") CC: [email protected] # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
mj22226
pushed a commit
to mj22226/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 30, 2024
commit f2363e6 upstream. Set squota incompat bit before committing the transaction that enables the feature. With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b torvalds#146 [5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.604303] <TASK> [5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproducer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -q -f /dev/sdb mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The issue is that when enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), we set BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE at fs_info->qgroup_flags and persist it in the quota root in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY, but we only set the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA after we commit the transaction used to enable simple quotas. This means that if after that transaction commit we unmount the filesystem without starting and committing any other transaction, or we have a power failure, the next time we mount the filesystem we will find the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE set in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY but we will not find the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA set in the superblock, triggering an assertion failure at: btrfs_read_qgroup_config() -> qgroup_read_enable_gen() To fix this issue, set the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction. Fixes: 182940f ("btrfs: qgroup: add new quota mode for simple quotas") CC: [email protected] # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
intersectRaven
pushed a commit
to intersectRaven/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2025
commit f2363e6 upstream. Set squota incompat bit before committing the transaction that enables the feature. With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b torvalds#146 [5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.604303] <TASK> [5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproducer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -q -f /dev/sdb mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The issue is that when enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), we set BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE at fs_info->qgroup_flags and persist it in the quota root in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY, but we only set the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA after we commit the transaction used to enable simple quotas. This means that if after that transaction commit we unmount the filesystem without starting and committing any other transaction, or we have a power failure, the next time we mount the filesystem we will find the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE set in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY but we will not find the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA set in the superblock, triggering an assertion failure at: btrfs_read_qgroup_config() -> qgroup_read_enable_gen() To fix this issue, set the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction. Fixes: 182940f ("btrfs: qgroup: add new quota mode for simple quotas") CC: [email protected] # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
gestionlin
pushed a commit
to gestionlin/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2025
Set squota incompat bit before committing the transaction that enables the feature. With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b torvalds#146 [5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.604303] <TASK> [5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproducer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -q -f /dev/sdb mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The issue is that when enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), we set BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE at fs_info->qgroup_flags and persist it in the quota root in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY, but we only set the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA after we commit the transaction used to enable simple quotas. This means that if after that transaction commit we unmount the filesystem without starting and committing any other transaction, or we have a power failure, the next time we mount the filesystem we will find the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE set in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY but we will not find the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA set in the superblock, triggering an assertion failure at: btrfs_read_qgroup_config() -> qgroup_read_enable_gen() To fix this issue, set the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction. Fixes: 182940f ("btrfs: qgroup: add new quota mode for simple quotas") CC: [email protected] # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
tacitness
pushed a commit
to tacitness/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2025
Set squota incompat bit before committing the transaction that enables the feature. With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b torvalds#146 [5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.604303] <TASK> [5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproducer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -q -f /dev/sdb mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The issue is that when enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), we set BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE at fs_info->qgroup_flags and persist it in the quota root in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY, but we only set the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA after we commit the transaction used to enable simple quotas. This means that if after that transaction commit we unmount the filesystem without starting and committing any other transaction, or we have a power failure, the next time we mount the filesystem we will find the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE set in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY but we will not find the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA set in the superblock, triggering an assertion failure at: btrfs_read_qgroup_config() -> qgroup_read_enable_gen() To fix this issue, set the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction. Fixes: 182940f ("btrfs: qgroup: add new quota mode for simple quotas") CC: [email protected] # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
tacitness
pushed a commit
to tacitness/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2025
Set squota incompat bit before committing the transaction that enables the feature. With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b torvalds#146 [5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.604303] <TASK> [5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproducer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -q -f /dev/sdb mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The issue is that when enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), we set BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE at fs_info->qgroup_flags and persist it in the quota root in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY, but we only set the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA after we commit the transaction used to enable simple quotas. This means that if after that transaction commit we unmount the filesystem without starting and committing any other transaction, or we have a power failure, the next time we mount the filesystem we will find the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE set in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY but we will not find the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA set in the superblock, triggering an assertion failure at: btrfs_read_qgroup_config() -> qgroup_read_enable_gen() To fix this issue, set the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction. Fixes: 182940f ("btrfs: qgroup: add new quota mode for simple quotas") CC: [email protected] # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update linux Repository