feat(copilot): add Olive Studio code-review agent skill - #173
Conversation
Give Copilot code review a review-focused skill under .github/skills/code-review so PR reviews follow local-first security, recipe/MCP boundaries, and testing tiers from AGENTS.md. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry @tonythethompson, you have reached your weekly rate limit of 500000 diff characters.
Please try again later or upgrade to continue using Sourcery
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 50 minutes You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdded a repository-specific code-review skill. It defines project context, review priorities, security checks, Olive and MCP constraints, architecture guidance, testing conventions, dependency rules, comment standards, and excluded activities. ChangesCode Review Skill
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 8✅ Passed checks (8 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
✨ Simplify code
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsLinked repositories: Public OSS repositories can only analyze public repositories installed in this organization. Analyzed Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
PR Summary by QodoAdd Copilot code-review skill with Olive Studio PR review guidance
AI Description
Diagram
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (1)
|
Greptile SummaryAdds a repository-specific Copilot code-review skill derived from Olive Studio’s existing development and review guidance.
Confidence Score: 5/5The PR appears safe to merge. No blocking failure remains.
|
| Filename | Overview |
|---|---|
| .github/skills/code-review/SKILL.md | Adds accurate, repository-specific code-review guidance with no eligible follow-up defect identified. |
Reviews (3): Last reviewed commit: "fix(copilot): refresh code-review skill ..." | Re-trigger Greptile
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Code Review by Qodo
1.
|
![qodo-code-review[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/484649?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Qodo FixerNo findings are within the configured fix scope. To change which findings are fixed, adjust the setting on your Qodo configuration page. |
Agents copying the relative tests path from repo root can hit the wrong suite; match AGENTS.md with cd olive-mcp-server before pytest. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Dismissed because a newer commit was pushed; Greptile will re-review the current head.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.github/skills/code-review/SKILL.md:
- Around line 98-100: Update the GitHub MCP guidance in the review workflow to
require its use only when a GitHub MCP server is available and configured. When
it is unavailable, direct agents to use the available GitHub integration, PR
description, or proceed without that lookup, while preserving the preference for
MCP-backed facts when accessible.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 5820b455-42eb-46c2-ac19-942ee22c7126
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
🔗 Linked repositories identified
CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:
tonythethompson/QuickShell(manual)tonythethompson/numan(manual)tonythethompson/dependency-chain-substrate(manual)
📜 Review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (3)
- GitHub Check: olive-pass-availability
- GitHub Check: python-tests
- GitHub Check: validate
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/skills/code-review/SKILL.md (1)
1-97: LGTM!Also applies to: 101-115
Align high-risk paths with routes/ai/, github.ts, and services/mcp; replace stale call_tool-import warning; name registerProvider/ALLOWED_AI_PROVIDERS plus aiProviderCatalog; only require GitHub MCP when configured. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Dismissed because a newer commit was pushed; Greptile will re-review the current head.
This branch was successfully deployed
1 participant
Summary
.github/skills/code-review/SKILL.mdso GitHub Copilot code review (and other agents) can load Olive Studio–specific PR review guidance.code-reviewfollows Copilot code review agent skills guidance.mcp<2, no live Olive in CI, pnpm-only, and dual AI provider registration checks fromAGENTS.md/REVIEW.md.Test plan
.github/skills/code-review/SKILL.mdis present on the PR head branchAGENTS.md(pnpm,mcp<2, no live Olive in CI)Made with Cursor