change web.php and composer.json

[bhargavraviya]

• change web.php according new method of group controller
• composer.json add minimum-stability is stable

@3x1io

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores

  • Updated dependency management to prioritize stable package releases.

• Refactor

  • Simplified routing definitions for improved clarity, while maintaining the current endpoint behavior.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces two changes. In the configuration file (composer.json), a new key is added to enforce the use of stable dependency versions by setting "minimum-stability": "stable". In the routes file (routes/web.php), the route definitions are refactored by adding use statements for BuilderController and SpladeMiddleware, updating the middleware declaration to reference the middleware directly, and switching to a more concise controller-based syntax for handling route actions.

Changes

File	Changes Summary
composer.json	Added a new key "minimum-stability": "stable" to specify that only stable versions of dependencies should be used.
routes/web.php	Refactored route definitions by adding use statements for BuilderController and SpladeMiddleware, updating the middleware declaration to direct reference, and adopting the controller method for concise syntax.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant R as Route Handler
    participant M as SpladeMiddleware
    participant C as BuilderController

    U->>R: Makes HTTP Request
    R->>M: Invokes middleware
    M->>C: Forwards request to controller action
    C-->>M: Returns response
    M-->>R: Passes response along
    R-->>U: Delivers final response

Loading

Poem

I'm just a bunny with joyful hops,
Coding changes that never stop.
Stable dependencies now lead the way,
Refactored routes make my day.
With sleek syntax and middleware flair,
I nibble bugs with utmost care!
🐰💻 Happy coding in every layer!

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b9232c and 079803c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• composer.json (2 hunks)
• routes/web.php (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (4)

routes/web.php (3)

5-6: LGTM! Clean import statements.

The imports are well-organized and follow PSR-4 autoloading standards.

---

8-10:

✅ Verification successful

LGTM! Verify middleware order.

The middleware setup and route group configuration look good. The use of controller() method helps reduce code duplication.

Let's verify that the middleware order aligns with the application's requirements:

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check middleware order in other route files for consistency

# Search for middleware declarations in route files
rg -A 2 "middleware\(\[" routes/

Length of output: 613

---

LGTM! Middleware order verified.

The middleware configuration in routes/web.php is correctly set up with the order ['web', 'auth', SpladeMiddleware::class], and our check confirms it aligns with similar configurations (e.g., in routes/api.php). The use of the controller() method is also well implemented to reduce code duplication. No changes required.

---

11-16:

✅ Verification successful

LGTM! Well-structured route definitions.

The routes follow RESTful conventions and have consistent naming. The route methods align with their operations (GET for retrieval, POST for modifications).

Let's verify that these routes don't conflict with existing ones:

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for route conflicts

# List all routes with 'pages' in the name
rg -A 2 "Route::.*pages" routes/

# Check if BuilderController methods exist
ast-grep --pattern $'class BuilderController {
  $$$
  builder($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  sections($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  remove($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  meta($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  metaStore($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  clear($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 1284

---

LGTM – Route definitions are consistent and conflict-free.
The verification shows that the routes/web.php definitions for 'pages' operations are distinct from the API routes and adhere to RESTful conventions with coherent naming. Although the ast-grep check for the BuilderController methods returned no matches, this likely indicates the controller is defined using a different pattern or within a group context. Please double-check that the expected controller methods (builder, sections, remove, meta, metaStore, and clear) are correctly implemented elsewhere. Otherwise, no changes are necessary.

composer.json (1)

40-40:

✅ Verification successful

LGTM! Verify package compatibility with stable versions.

Setting minimum-stability to "stable" is a good practice for production environments. However, let's verify that all required packages have stable versions available.

Let's check the stability of required packages:

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check package stability

# Get latest versions of required packages
echo "Checking tomatophp/console-helpers..."
curl -s https://repo.packagist.org/p2/tomatophp/console-helpers.json | jq -r '.packages."tomatophp/console-helpers"[0].version'

echo "Checking tomatophp/filament-icons..."
curl -s https://repo.packagist.org/p2/tomatophp/filament-icons.json | jq -r '.packages."tomatophp/filament-icons"[0].version'

echo "Checking tomatophp/filament-translation-component..."
curl -s https://repo.packagist.org/p2/tomatophp/filament-translation-component.json | jq -r '.packages."tomatophp/filament-translation-component"[0].version'

Length of output: 721

---

Verified: Stable Packages Confirmed

The composer.json setting for "minimum-stability": "stable" is appropriate for a production environment. Our verification shows that all required packages have stable versions available:

• tomatophp/console-helpers: v1.1.0
• tomatophp/filament-icons: v1.1.4
• tomatophp/filament-translation-component: v1.0.4

LGTM – no further changes are necessary.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.