Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support QNX OS without RUSTFLAGS #1800

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

Support QNX OS without RUSTFLAGS #1800

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2024

Conversation

Thomasdezeeuw
Copy link
Collaborator

Removes the need for --cfg mio_unsupported_force_poll_poll.

Removes the need for --cfg mio_unsupported_force_poll_poll.
@Thomasdezeeuw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@AkhilTThomas any change you could test this without any RUSTFLAGS? I can only run cargo check.

@AkhilTThomas
Copy link
Contributor

@AkhilTThomas any change you could test this without any RUSTFLAGS? I can only run cargo check.

@SebastianSchildt Could you help out here? my license has expired.

@Thomasdezeeuw Thomasdezeeuw changed the title Support NTO without RUSTFLAGS Support QNX OS without RUSTFLAGS Jun 9, 2024
@SebastianSchildt
Copy link
Contributor

@AkhilTThomas any change you could test this without any RUSTFLAGS? I can only run cargo check.

@SebastianSchildt Could you help out here? my license has expired.

I currently have no usable license as well. Let me ask around

@Thomasdezeeuw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm going to merge this so we can add QNX OS to the CI in #1804, @SebastianSchildt if you find someone to run the tests that would be appreciated.

@Thomasdezeeuw Thomasdezeeuw merged commit 32678fb into master Jun 14, 2024
31 checks passed
@Thomasdezeeuw Thomasdezeeuw deleted the update-nto branch June 14, 2024 08:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants