Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(postgres): Support DIV() func for integer division #3602
feat(postgres): Support DIV() func for integer division #3602
Changes from 1 commit
94e9a6d
1cf2970
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
CAST(4 AS REAL)
here looks a bit weird, I don't think it should've been added. The root cause is that theIntDiv
generator doesn't properly populate thetyped
andsafe
args, disregarding the dialect's semantics. It seems like that method was added a long time ago, so this is most likely like an oversight.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is because Postgres uses typed division, so since we're generating a
Div
as part ofIntDiv
's generation, the typed division semantics should be respected. See for example how we don't add a cast toREAL
here:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
May be best to address this in a followup PR after all. I played around a bit and it seems like we'll need to think more about how to parse / generate
IntDiv
.