Skip to content
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
59 changes: 57 additions & 2 deletions docs/proposals/registry.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# ArchW1z proposal registry — agents read this first
version: 1
updated_at: "2026-08-07T00:00:00Z"
updated_by: tembo
updated_at: "2026-08-21T00:00:00Z"
updated_by: Manus

proposals:
- id: context-relationship-graph
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -129,3 +129,58 @@ proposals:
status: posted
related_prs: [63]
gates_required: [repo-gate]

- id: actions-refinements
title: "Issue #192 action-integration refinements"
author: Manus AI
posted_at: 2026-08-19
Comment on lines +133 to +136

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remediation recommended

1. Registry summary truncates entries 🐞 Bug ◔ Observability

The proposal-lifecycle workflow only prints the first 120 lines of docs/proposals/registry.yaml,
and the newly-registered proposals start after that cutoff, so they will not appear in the CI job
summary. This makes reviewers/operators miss the newly-added registrations in the workflow output
even when validation passes.
Agent Prompt
### Issue description
The `proposal-lifecycle` workflow summarizes only the first 120 lines of `docs/proposals/registry.yaml`, which now excludes newly-added proposal entries (they start after line 120). This reduces observability during PR review and triage.

### Issue Context
The workflow currently uses `sed -n '1,120p'` to build the step summary.

### Fix Focus Areas
- .github/workflows/proposal-lifecycle.yml[30-35]
- docs/proposals/registry.yaml[133-186]

### Suggested change
Replace the `sed -n '1,120p'` line with one of:
- `cat docs/proposals/registry.yaml >> "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"`
- or increase the range (e.g., `sed -n '1,260p' ...`) if you want a hard cap.

Keep the existing fenced code block markers.

ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools

status: accepted
priority: P1
path: active/actions-refinements/
reviewers:
- id: user
role: operator+approver
status: accepted
- id: Manus AI
role: executor
status: executing
related_issues: [192, 175]
related_prs: [193, 81, 92, 143, 72, 232]
gates_required: [repo-gate, termux-smoke]

- id: icm-architect-integration
title: "ICM Architect custom-fork submodule integration"
author: timerloggedout-spec
posted_at: 2026-08-17
source: source.md
status: executing
priority: P2
path: active/icm-architect-integration/
reviewers:
- id: timerloggedout-spec
role: operator-authorizer
status: accepted
related_prs: []
related_branches:
- feat/icm-architect-submodule
gates_required: [repo-gate, termux-smoke]

- id: kimi-cloud-offload
title: "Corrected Cloud Offload & Parallelization Evaluation"
author: Kimi2.6
posted_at: 2026-08-04
source: corrected_cloud_offload_evaluation.md
status: posted
priority: P1
path: active/kimi-cloud-offload/
reviewers:
- id: kimi
role: author
status: posted
- id: grok-archw1z
role: registrar
status: posted
related_prs: []
related_branches:
- docs/kimi-cloud-offload-evaluation
gates_required: [repo-gate]
Loading