-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
feat: enhance skip functionality with dynamic skip reasons #3609
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job Pull Request Review: Enhanced Skip Functionality with Dynamic Skip ReasonsReview Checklist:
✅ Overall Assessment: APPROVED with Minor SuggestionsThis PR successfully implements dynamic skip functionality while maintaining backward compatibility and following TUnit's design principles. 🎯 Strengths1. Code Quality & Design
2. Documentation & Examples
3. Test Coverage
4. Public API Changes
🔧 Technical ImplementationSkipAttribute.cs (Lines 75 & 106)public virtual Task<bool> ShouldSkip(TestRegisteredContext context) => Task.FromResult(true);
protected virtual string GetSkipReason(TestRegisteredContext context) => Reason;✅ Well-designed extension points that enable:
TestRegisteredContext.cs (Lines 60-64)public void SetSkipped(string reason)
{
TestContext.SkipReason = reason;
TestContext.Metadata.TestDetails.ClassInstance = SkippedTestInstance.Instance;
}✅ Clean API for programmatic test skipping during registration 🚀 Performance Considerations
🔒 Security Assessment
💡 Minor Suggestions for Enhancement1. Consider ValueTask Pattern (Optional)For potentially synchronous operations, consider public virtual ValueTask<bool> ShouldSkip(TestRegisteredContext context)
=> new(true);This would align with TUnit's performance-first philosophy, though the impact is minimal in test registration. 2. Null Safety Enhancement (Optional)Add null checks in protected virtual string GetSkipReason(TestRegisteredContext context)
=> context?.TestName != null ? Reason : "Test skipped";3. Consider Caching (Future Enhancement)For expensive ✅ Compliance with TUnit Guidelines
🎯 Test Scenarios Validated
📊 Impact Assessment
🚀 Recommendation: MERGEThis PR is ready for merge as it:
The enhancement significantly improves TUnit's skip functionality while maintaining the framework's high standards for code quality and performance. |
|
Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job 🔍 Code Review: Dynamic Skip Functionality Enhancement✅ Overall Assessment: Excellent ImplementationThis PR successfully enhances TUnit's skip functionality with dynamic skip reasons while maintaining the framework's core principles. The implementation is well-designed, thoroughly tested, and follows TUnit's architectural patterns. 📊 Review Summary✅ Strengths:
🏗️ Architecture & Design QualityScore: 9/10 The design elegantly extends the existing
Key Design Strengths:
🧪 Test Coverage & QualityScore: 9/10 The test suite is comprehensive and well-structured: TUnit.Engine.Tests/DynamicSkipReasonTests.cs:
TUnit.TestProject/DynamicSkipReasonTests.cs:
Test Quality Highlights: // Excellent example showing dynamic reason generation
protected override string GetSkipReason(TestRegisteredContext context)
{
return $"Test '{context.TestName}' skipped for device '{_deviceName}' via GetSkipReason override";
}🚀 Performance AnalysisScore: 8/10 The implementation follows TUnit's performance-first principles: Positive Performance Aspects:
Performance Considerations:
🔒 Security AssessmentScore: 10/10 No security concerns identified:
📝 Code Quality & StandardsScore: 9/10 The code excellently follows TUnit's style guidelines: Strengths: // ✅ Excellent XML documentation with examples
/// <summary>
/// Gets the skip reason for the test.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="context">The test context containing information about the test being registered.</param>
/// <returns>The reason why the test should be skipped.</returns>
// ✅ Modern C# patterns
public virtual Task<bool> ShouldSkip(TestRegisteredContext context) => Task.FromResult(true);
// ✅ Collection expressions
private static readonly string[] AllowedDevices = ["AllowedDevice", "AnotherAllowedDevice"];Minor Improvement Opportunities:
🔄 Dual-Mode Compatibility AssessmentScore: 8/10 The feature appears compatible with both execution modes: Source Generator Mode: Skip logic is evaluated during test registration, which occurs before code generation Recommendation: Consider adding explicit dual-mode tests to verify identical behavior across both modes, following the pattern in CLAUDE.md: [Test]
[Arguments(ExecutionMode.SourceGenerated)]
[Arguments(ExecutionMode.Reflection)]
public async Task DynamicSkip_BehavesIdentically(ExecutionMode mode) { }📋 API Design ExcellenceScore: 10/10 The API surface additions are minimal and intuitive: New
|
Fixes #3607