docs: publish the canvas session records that never left one machine - #742
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two design system contracts the screens needed: Input gained multiline, rows, marks with a required marksLabel, and maxLength; both shells typed their pinned bottom slot so a destination takes the composer and a flow takes its one forward action. Wrapped gained its cover with the period picker and four load states, the two real pages the app builds and the drawing had dropped, the second streak number, the tap zones and the keyboard, the save beside the share, and the referral link. Its false Pro gate sentence is corrected, so it carries no plan axis. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Onboarding, Wrapped, Entrar, Verificacao, Sobre, Estados, Celebracao, Offline and Widget Android all raised to what the app does, so all 21 screen documents have now had the pass. Two design system contracts landed first: Input gained multiline, rows, marks with a required marksLabel and maxLength, and both shells typed their pinned bottom slot so a destination takes the composer and a flow takes its one forward action. Six more claims that the code cannot do something were false and were found by opening the file: Wrapped's Pro gate, Entrar's per device lock, Verificacao's unanswerable attempt window, Sobre's D69 deletion of the feature guide, Celebracao's unordered event stream and Offline's unbounded queue. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…canvas session records Origin had already merged main into redesign/main twice, bringing the three new ticket-tool verbs and the /handoff skill. This machine held four unpushed docs commits recording the canvas sessions, which hot.md already cites as landed on this branch. Neither side had the other and the two touch different trees, so both survive. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. 1 Skipped Deployment
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
hot.mdcitescb9a2a73..09174a00as landed onredesign/main. They were not. Fourdocs:commits recording the canvas sessions existed only on one machine, and were found on 2026-08-22 while cleaning the repository.They are the run log the whole redesign ticket set was derived from, so losing that machine would have lost the record of how 21 screen documents reached their final state, what was found false, and why each decision landed.
What this adds
Documentation only, +713 lines, no code:
design/prompts/screens.mddesign/prompts/last-nine-screens.mdWhy it is a PR rather than a push
redesign/maintakes direct pushes by convention, but thegit-guardrailshook blocks them: its pattern[\s:/](?:main|master)(?=$|[\s:])matches the/maininredesign/main. That is a false positive, and the hook is deliberately conservative on this point, since wrongly blocking a push is recoverable and wrongly allowing one ontomainis not. So this follows the hook's own instruction and opens a PR instead of working around it.Worth deciding separately whether that regex should exclude a
<prefix>/mainbranch. Not changed here, because narrowing a write guard is not something to slip into a docs PR.Verification
The branch is
origin/redesign/mainplus these four commits, merged rather than rebased because the branch history is already published. Both sides of the divergence survive: origin had already mergedmaintwice, bringing the new ticket-tool verbs and the/handoffskill, and this machine had the records. The two touch different trees, so the merge was clean.Both harnesses pass on the merged tree:
🤖 Generated with Claude Code