Repository navigation
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
WalkthroughAdded new Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds a canopywave provider mapping for the Moonshot kimi-k2.6 model, aligning it with the existing kimi-k2.5 canopywave configuration and pricing patterns in @llmgateway/models.
Changes:
- Add
canopywaveprovider entry formoonshotai/kimi-k2.6with input/cached/output pricing, discount, and 256K context. - Mark the new provider mapping as
test: "skip"consistent with other canopywave entries in this file.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@packages/models/src/models/moonshot.ts`:
- Around line 349-365: Remove the Canopy Wave mapping for the Moonshot K2.6
entry: locate the object with providerId "canopywave" and modelName
"moonshotai/kimi-k2.6" (currently marked test: "skip") and delete it from the
models list; if you want to keep a placeholder instead, add a clearly-documented
commented note or guarded flag and do not include it as an active mapping until
you have public launch confirmation or validated pricing/availability via a
smoke test against the moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 endpoint.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: e3e20ec9-af8b-4f99-9044-d48056076daa
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/models/src/models/moonshot.ts
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Summary
canopywaveprovider entry forkimi-k2.6with $0.50/$2.80/$0.10 per MTok (in/out/cached) and 256K context, matching the existingkimi-k2.5canopywave pattern (discount 0.3, skip in tests).Test plan
pnpm --filter @llmgateway/models buildpassespnpm formatproduces no changes to the edited file🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit