Skip to content

Conversation

@leroyguillaume
Copy link

@leroyguillaume leroyguillaume commented Mar 30, 2023

Description

Allow override of protocol in egress rule.

Motivation and Context

TCP are insufficient in case of S3 export.

Breaking Changes

No.

How Has This Been Tested?

By creating new SG with protocol set to all.

  • I have updated at least one of the examples/* to demonstrate and validate my change(s)
  • I have tested and validated these changes using one or more of the provided examples/* projects
  • I have executed pre-commit run -a on my pull request

@leroyguillaume leroyguillaume changed the title allow override of protocol in egress rule feat!: allow override of protocol in egress rule Mar 30, 2023
@leroyguillaume leroyguillaume changed the title feat!: allow override of protocol in egress rule Feature: allow override of protocol in egress rule Mar 30, 2023
@leroyguillaume leroyguillaume changed the title Feature: allow override of protocol in egress rule Feat: allow override of protocol in egress rule Mar 30, 2023
@leroyguillaume leroyguillaume changed the title Feat: allow override of protocol in egress rule Feat: Allow override of protocol in egress rule Mar 30, 2023
@leroyguillaume leroyguillaume changed the title Feat: Allow override of protocol in egress rule feat: Allow override of protocol in egress rule Mar 30, 2023
@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member

This issue has been resolved in version 8.0.0 🎉

@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 11, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants