-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
Feature: limited datatypes #374
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
First mini review: I didn't really look at anything, but the one thing I noticed is that you added an option to stay unlimited.
For the benefit of maintenance we should only support the limited integers.
Sorry that we weren't clear enough on that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR, this is the first review. I'll review again after the changes have been made.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the changes, I have some more comments
|
blocked by BETA |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add some additional parsing tests for Int128
(mostly larger numbers, or large negative numbers) so that we can be sure that it actually works correctly
# Conflicts: # src/rdf4cpp/BigDecimal.hpp # src/rdf4cpp/datatypes/registry/util/CharConvExt.hpp
close #369
TODO:
xsd:Integer
are unecessarily expensive #336 (__int128 is faster to construct)