Skip to content

Conversation

mcb5637
Copy link
Collaborator

@mcb5637 mcb5637 commented Jun 5, 2025

close #369

TODO:

@mcb5637 mcb5637 changed the title Feature/limited datatypes Feature: limited datatypes Jun 5, 2025
@mcb5637 mcb5637 marked this pull request as ready for review June 11, 2025 12:48
@mcb5637 mcb5637 requested a review from liss-h June 11, 2025 12:48
Copy link
Collaborator

@liss-h liss-h left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First mini review: I didn't really look at anything, but the one thing I noticed is that you added an option to stay unlimited.

For the benefit of maintenance we should only support the limited integers.

Sorry that we weren't clear enough on that

Copy link
Collaborator

@liss-h liss-h left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR, this is the first review. I'll review again after the changes have been made.

Copy link
Collaborator

@liss-h liss-h left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the changes, I have some more comments

@mcb5637 mcb5637 requested a review from liss-h July 4, 2025 13:54
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jul 4, 2025

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)
4.6% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@liss-h liss-h added the blocked This is blocked by something else label Jul 17, 2025
@liss-h
Copy link
Collaborator

liss-h commented Jul 17, 2025

blocked by BETA

Copy link
Collaborator

@liss-h liss-h left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add some additional parsing tests for Int128 (mostly larger numbers, or large negative numbers) so that we can be sure that it actually works correctly

mcb5637 added 3 commits August 4, 2025 15:05
# Conflicts:
#	src/rdf4cpp/BigDecimal.hpp
#	src/rdf4cpp/datatypes/registry/util/CharConvExt.hpp
@mcb5637 mcb5637 requested a review from liss-h August 4, 2025 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

blocked This is blocked by something else

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add size limits for unlimited datatypes Some operations on xsd:Integer are unecessarily expensive

2 participants