Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test Lowering For Transpose #1759

Closed
ctodTT opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2214
Closed

Test Lowering For Transpose #1759

ctodTT opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2214
Assignees

Comments

@ctodTT
Copy link
Contributor

ctodTT commented Jan 13, 2025

Add a builder binding and test the lowering of torch.transpose

@ctodTT ctodTT self-assigned this Jan 13, 2025
ctodTT added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 14, 2025
This change registers a `torch.transpose` lowering to the builder,
testing the lowering and allowing a golden test.

Closes #1759
ctodTT added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 16, 2025
This change registers a `torch.transpose` lowering to the builder,
testing the lowering and allowing a golden test.

Closes #1759
ctodTT added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2025
This change registers a `torch.transpose` lowering to the builder,
testing the lowering and allowing a golden test.

Closes #1759
ctodTT added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 22, 2025
This change registers a `torch.transpose` lowering to the builder,
testing the lowering and allowing a golden test.

Closes #1759
ctodTT added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2025
ctodTT added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2025
@ctodTT ctodTT closed this as completed in 0f3f4d3 Feb 19, 2025
vwellsTT pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 20, 2025
Closes #1961
Closes #1759

### Problem description
`transpose` wasn't exposed to `ttir_builder`, preventing llama attention
layer modelling

### Special Thanks
To @vprajapati-tt for inadvertently fixing a blocking memory issue that
was exposed by this bug (See #2136 )
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant