Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Proxy For Call doesn't seems to work #23916

Open
ExPl0siF opened this issue Jan 17, 2022 · 16 comments
Open

Use Proxy For Call doesn't seems to work #23916

ExPl0siF opened this issue Jan 17, 2022 · 16 comments

Comments

@ExPl0siF
Copy link

ExPl0siF commented Jan 17, 2022

Hey everyone!

I have a Firewall which block every ports except my list. I've wanted to use Telegram on it but it seems that Telegram uses random ports. So I tried to use the proxy method with a SOCKS5 proxy on port 1080. I opened port 1080 (Both TCP/UDP) on the firewall. The proxy can be reached and is connected. But when I tried to make calls the same problem as if I didn't used the proxy happen -> the call cannot connect (stays on exchanging keys or connecting ... and quit call). So it seems that the Proxy For Call option doesn't work, isn't it? Something can escape my brain but I can't see what at the moment ...

Operating Systems: MacOS 12.1 | Windows 11
Telegram Version: 3.4.3

Thanks for reading and helping

P.S.: Doesn't know if it's an app issue or a something related on my part so can't tell if it's a question or a bug

@ilya-fedin
Copy link
Contributor

Do you mean one-to-one calls or voice chats? If the second, this is a duplciate of #9984

@ExPl0siF
Copy link
Author

Do you mean one-to-one calls or voice chats? If the second, this is a duplciate of #9984

I mean one to one call. Already see the other post. Thanks!

@ExPl0siF
Copy link
Author

ExPl0siF commented Jan 18, 2022

Hi @Aokromes, could you please tell me why this issue was closed? I said that the error was on one-to-one call. So this is not a duplicate of #9984

@PackElend
Copy link

@ilya-fedin one2one call

@Mandofskii
Copy link

When telegram support socks5 proxies for video chats?

@mostafaznv
Copy link

I have this problem too.

@CodingMoeButa
Copy link

I have this problem too.

@AqlaSolutions
Copy link

Same here

@Domest0s
Copy link

Domest0s commented Apr 6, 2023

The same issue. Having it for a long time. Windows 10.

@aga-git
Copy link

aga-git commented May 18, 2023

Same issue with Telegram Desktop 4.8.1. Windows 7/8/10/11.
Socks 5 proxy not just being used for calls even so having 'Advanced' - 'connection type' - 'use custom proxy' - 'use proxy for calls' ticked AND in 'Privacy and security' - 'Calls' - 'Use peer-two-peer with' - 'Nobody' selected. Call JUST not goes through socks proxy server, it goes directly to one of telegram servers IPs. Confirmed via Microsoft Network Monitor. Conventional traffic (chats/etc) goes via proxy, calls - dropping after unsuccessful key exchange (explainable because no NAT is allowed in our network, only proxies are used). Advanced dante socks5 proxy setup was useless...

@alk3pInjection
Copy link

Same here on tdesktop 4.10.3 flatpak. Any updates?
I believe this is a severe security issue for users who intend to use (and probably rely on) this feature.

@tm4ig
Copy link

tm4ig commented Jan 1, 2024

I bought telegram premium not for stupid emoji, but to support development. And I am very disappointed that this critical bug has not been fixed for two years.
Looks like telegram sucks

@mabt
Copy link

mabt commented Apr 11, 2024

Same issue there

@AbdullahZubair
Copy link

Having the same issue. Not sure where is the problem lies.

@amir14a
Copy link

amir14a commented Jul 11, 2024

Same problem

@LionelHoudelier
Copy link

LionelHoudelier commented Sep 12, 2024

SOLVED FOR ME:
MY CONFIG: Desktop (debian flatpak flathug for me):
REASON of the bug: The option "use proxy for calls does NOT seem too work" because it STILL uses ports 596 597 598 599 and 1400 (opensnitch told me that) INSTEAD OF ONLY THE PROXY PORT when calling (text messages are working as expected).
I opened all these ports on my firewall (ufw) and it worked!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests