Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Eliminate redundant Pod Get. #3496

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2020

Conversation

mattmoor
Copy link
Member

@mattmoor mattmoor commented Nov 4, 2020

The TaskRun reconciler was doing a Pod Get immediately prior to calling StopSidecars, which immediate refetches the Pod. This adapts StopSidecars to take the namespace/name and return the resulting Pod to elide the redundant fetch, and avoids wrapping errors in the case of NotFound, so that callers can be sensitive to that.

See also this slack thread: https://tektoncd.slack.com/archives/CLCCEBUMU/p1604503658269500

/kind bug

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

  • Includes tests (if functionality changed/added)
  • Includes docs (if user facing)
  • Commit messages follow commit message best practices
  • Release notes block has been filled in or deleted (only if no user facing changes)

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

Release Notes

NONE

/assign @imjasonh @vdemeester @afrittoli

The TaskRun reconciler was doing a Pod Get immediately prior to calling StopSidecars, which immediate refetches the Pod.  This adapts StopSidecars to take the namespace/name and return the resulting Pod to elide the redundant fetch, and avoids wrapping errors in the case of NotFound, so that callers can be sensitive to that.

See also this slack thread: https://tektoncd.slack.com/archives/CLCCEBUMU/p1604503658269500
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. label Nov 4, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 4, 2020
@mattmoor
Copy link
Member Author

mattmoor commented Nov 4, 2020

/test check-pr-has-kind-label

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/pod/entrypoint.go 85.1% 84.1% -1.0

Copy link
Member

@imjasonh imjasonh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Does this look less flaky if you run e2e cancel/timeout tests many times?

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 4, 2020
Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/meow

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester: cat image

In response to this:

/meow

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vdemeester

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 4, 2020
@mattmoor
Copy link
Member Author

mattmoor commented Nov 4, 2020

/retest

Does this look less flaky if you run e2e cancel/timeout tests many times?

My testing is via automation that doesn't lend itself to trying that easily, but while this works its way in, I can stage a PR that pulls it in and retest it until GHA throttles me to death 😉

@mattmoor
Copy link
Member Author

mattmoor commented Nov 4, 2020

1/3 downstream legs have passed 🤞

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 88d2606 into tektoncd:master Nov 4, 2020
@mattmoor mattmoor deleted the handle-pod-not-found-better branch November 4, 2020 18:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants