Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change TimeoutHandler to respect namespace scoping #2604

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 18, 2020
Merged

Change TimeoutHandler to respect namespace scoping #2604

merged 2 commits into from
May 18, 2020

Conversation

dghubble
Copy link
Contributor

@dghubble dghubble commented May 12, 2020

Changes

  • Pass --namespace value to taskrun and pipelinerun NewController
    to facilitate namespace-scoped behaviors
  • Change TimeoutHandler CheckTimeouts to timeout taskrun/pipelinerun's
    in the scoped namespace or all namespaces (default if unset)

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

Release Notes

Avoid performing a cluster-level namespace list when --namespace is set

Fix #2603

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented May 12, 2020

CLA Check
The committers are authorized under a signed CLA.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 12, 2020
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @dghubble. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a tektoncd member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/meow
/cc @sbwsg @bobcatfish

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester: cat image

In response to this:

/meow
/cc @sbwsg @bobcatfish

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot requested review from bobcatfish and a user May 12, 2020 09:23
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vdemeester

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 12, 2020
@bobcatfish
Copy link
Collaborator

/ok-to-test

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 12, 2020
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

ah lol, I forgot to do that 😓

* Pass `--namespace` value to taskrun and pipelinerun NewController
to facilitate namespace-scoped behaviors
* Change TimeoutHandler `CheckTimeouts` to timeout taskrun/pipelinerun's
in the scoped namespace or all namespaces (default if unset)

Related: #2603
@dghubble
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think the v1alpha build problem was from CI merging this with #2577, I've rebased. I notice this project requires a Go v1.14 feature for tests (t.Cleanup). Therefore I used a Go v1.14.2 container to run make test-unit and is passes.

Does this project include a Dockerfile or image build? I'd like to also confirm the fix by actually running it.

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/timeout_handler.go 75.2% 76.4% 1.2

@dghubble
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think this is ok to review again

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/kind bug

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label May 18, 2020
Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 18, 2020
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 5c047b1 into tektoncd:master May 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Namespaced controller should not list cluster namespaces
4 participants